Introduction Lawyers’ duties are relevant not only to their clients, for there is also a

The concept of mandatory pro bono and whether or not lawyers should be required to participate in this public service has been the contentious subject of debate over recent years. Focusing on Mirko Bagaric and Penny Dimopoulos’ statement: “In our view not only do lawyers not have a duty to act for free, but they are misguided in doing so and should, for the long term benefit of the community, cease engaging in pro bono work,” this essay will critically analyse the implications of introducing mandatory pro bono into the legal profession by examining both the positive and negative aspects through the issues of altruism, tradition, government funding and the onus on small firms.

These two statements present clear support for the conclusion that Wasserstrom believes lawyers are positioned in an amoral world. The second conclusion is defended by many statements and situations concerning the lawyer?client relationship. Wasserstrom identifies a few dominant traits with in this relationship containing inequality, created by role-differentiation, and vulnerability.

The subject of law always fascinated me. Unlike medicine, the practicalities of the subject do not dampen my passion for the subject but rather fuel it. Law is engaging because it requires constant adapting and analyzing. With every case comes a unique set of issues. The challenge of having to work within the bounds of the law while also planning a compelling and forceful case for a client is thrilling. Every word holds tremendous power in law. Practicing law requires eloquence. Anecdotal stories are the hallmark of the best lawyers. There exists no third person perspective in law. I admire how good lawyers can form a message that appeals to people’s emotions and reason. I relish the opportunity to study every minute detail of law and become a practicing lawyer because of all the ways it would challenge me.

For example, taking time to examine interactions and the way in which workers relate to clients, both verbally and nonverbally. To make ethical decisions, in some cases would be wise to involve the client in the process. Corey (2015) Suggests that making decisions for the client instead of with can hurt the working relationship. Additionally, it is suggested that one discusses the ethical issues that pertains to them (the client) as an individual. This not only shows the client that their opinion matters, but displays to communities that help professionals do not exist to control your

You have asked me to summarize the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Doré v Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, SCR 395 and analyze whether the Law society is likely to sanction Evan Frank. Although the Rules of Professional Conduct place limitations on certain conduct to ensure professionalism, the expressive rights of lawyers must be given due respect and the likelihood of Mr. Frank’s sanction will depend on a fair balance of “expressive value” of the content in the letter, with the public’s expectation of professionalism.

Acting as a legal practitioner is considered a “great privilege” and “offers the opportunity to serve the community in a profoundly important way.” Lawyer’s roles as officers of the Court and administrators of justice give them a monopoly on the delivery of counselling and representation services. In order to “maintain their capacity to serve the community” , legal practitioners must accept that they are

Hence, the lawyers here are important. Professional needs to have a broad perspective to serve the society

Ethics in the profession of counseling are critical and serve as the framework for practitioners. They educate counseling practitioners and the general public about the responsibilities of the profession (Corey, Corey, & Callanan, 2011). Ethics in the counseling profession are vital in that they allow for various approaches and procedures to be utilized in order to determine the best outcome for difficult or complex problems. In my experience, most practitioners look at the code of ethics from a prospective of fear opposed to an opportunity for the betterment of client. Many practitioners are so fearful of being involved in a lawsuit that they focus their time and energy with fulfilling legal requirements rather than utilizing ethics as an opportunity to determine what is best for the client (Corey, 2013). Corey stated that in this era of litigation, it makes sense to be aware of the legal aspects of practice and to do what is possible to reduce a malpractice suit, but it is a mistake to equate behaving legally with being ethical (2013). Ethics are more than a set of rules established to avoid lawsuits; they are critical thinking tools that challenge and assist

Pages 1 and 2 are the original Interview questions submitted. Pages 3, 4, and 5 are the summary of my interview, and my reflection on this career choice. Page 6 is the notes that were taken during the interview process. There is no cited work because I used no outside sources.

In making a once-and-for-all decision that his or her duty to the client is paramount, a lawyer ignores the fact that the context of each legal case is unique. Advocacy should involve careful consideration of the various interests at stake within a specific context (Farrow, 2008). Depending on the context, in fact, one could argue there are other factors that supersede the importance of the client’s aims. In vowing to “neglect no one’s interest” lawyers have an obligation not only to the client but to the general public as well [Law Society of Upper Canada, 2014, p.24]. While a client’s cause may have an adequate legal basis and a lawyer’s advocacy falls within the limits of the law, this does not mean the two are more important than or consistent with the values and interests of the general public. Moreover, a lawyer may be put in a situation where zealous advocacy of a client’s interests may have significant implications for health, safety, or general well-being of an innocent third party. To advocate solely to achieve the client’s ends would be a violation of the lawyer’s oath to “safeguard the rights…of all persons,” such as the rights to life and security of the person [Law Society of Upper Canada, 2014, p.24]. In short, there are non-legal factors that merit a lawyer’s attention and should influence a lawyer’s professional

In everyday situations there are always the questions of what is right and what is wrong. Ethics is the principle that aims to set a standard for individual’s roles, responsibility, societal responsibility and other areas of life. The study of ethics has been around since the time of Greek civilization and it still plays an important in the modern society. Ethics play a huge role in any legal, moral, social and profession setting. It is a standard which uses the moral principles and code of conduct to guide the professional and client (Ponton, 2009). Ethics is defined as a standard for conduct of an individual and it decides how an individual ought to act in various contexts (Law, 2015). In counselling ethics is used to minimise

It is important to learn that it is not significant that the lawyer must have the special knowledge, training and other prior experience to handle all kinds of legal problems of any type to which the lawyer is found to be unfamiliar. The key significant idea in this regard is that even a newly admitted lawyer could have the required competence as that of a practitioner who havethe long years’ experience. Still, in case of any emergency, the lawyer has

For example, Canon 3 states: A lawyer should assist in preventing the unauthorized practice of law (Committee of Professional Ethics). Those who are not held accountable to the justice system do not have to abide by the law or the standards of lawyers, especially in situations that involve lawyer-client confidentiality. Those who do hold a license to practice law are required to uphold the confidentiality of their clients such as in the case of admission of guilt to a capital crime. A non-lawyer is not bound by the legal system to preserve privacy with a client, which would jeopardize the client’s future and cause distrust of the legal system. Canon 5 reads: A lawyer should exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of a client (Committee of Professional Ethics). Lawyers are trusted with significant amounts of personal information by their clients, and choosing to use that information for personal gain or to negatively affect the client would be deemed unethical. For example, if a lawyer is entrusted with details about a client’s new investment in real estate, then the lawyer should not make an investment in this property that would minimize his or her client’s opportunity to profit. Along with the ethical considerations, there are stout consequences for acting irresponsibly or compromising the lawyer-client

It's been surprising at how much ethical professional practice and policy has been discussed in my graduate coursework. Not only have we discussed the importance of becoming familiar with laws and mandates that govern our practice, but also about creating and maintaining an ethical lens in which we view our work with students. As someone who isn’t familiar with the inner workings of the law, I found it comforting to learn about the relationships between practitioners and legal counsel. Some of the most informative experiences I’ve had in this competency come from listening to guest speakers in class, such as Barbara Krause, or seeking out meetings with

Educational law clinics raises the ethical dilemma of exploiting vulnerable people in society for pedagogical benefits. As such, if a supervisor believes that a case provides inadequate educative benefit, it may be turned away; or in circumstances whereby a case has been opened, closed. This refusal to help these clients can prove to be problematic in instances where the law clinic is the last avenue of assistance for them. However, a selective service does not necessarily translate to a sub-standard one. As was made clear by Brayne, Duncan and Grimes “once a real-client is taken on there is only one acceptable standard of work – that of professional competence and ethical practice”.