Introduction The trade between the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) is estimated at a

The Meat Inspection Act of 1906 was an attempt to regulate the meatpacking industry and to assure consumers that the meat they were eating was safe. In brief, this act made compulsory the careful inspection of meat before its consummation, established sanitary standards for slaughterhouses and processing plants, and required continuous U.S. Department of Agriculture inspection of meat processing and packaging. Yet, the most important objectives set by the law are the prevention of adulterated or misbranded livestock and products from being commercialized and sold as food, and the making sure that meat and all its products are processed and prepared in the adequate sanitary and hygienic conditions (Reeves 35). Imported meat and its various

Have you asked yourself yet, who regulates meat products? The USDA does. This government agency ensures that the nation’s commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products are safe, wholesome and properly labeled and packaged to consumer and buyers. The Department of Health and Human Services and The Environmental Protection agency are two reputable government agencies that coordinate with the USDA to ensure food and medical safety is regulated lawfully. Every four years, there is an important “food code” that is revised by U.S. Food and Drug Administration that affects all levels of government agencies. The food code is used as a model to develop and update food safety rules that require consistency with national food regulatory policies. Businesses and industries controlled and regulated by the food code are retail, food service, and medical institutions such as

The main cause for a decrease in trade, a hike in prices for imported goods like rice and pulses (due to shortages) and for Dubai increasing air transport availability to other countries like Texas is due to the Great Recession that hit the world in 2008. Although Dubai wasn’t part of the crisis directly, we were affected by the repercussions of the international economic system as U.A.E plays an active and influential role in international economic relations.

It is very difficult to find the way all of the international resolutions fairly works for all countries. Each country has their individual culture, and sometimes the culture is hardly understood for other countries. In globalization, the world trade is one of the most important sector in all countries, and WTO has a crucial role. It never should be controlled by few dominant countries, such as the US. Anytime WTO enacts international rules, all decision should be based on certain research and ethical purposes. Each of nations has different idea. For example, the reason 94% of Australian are against whaling is that they think that whales are scared animals, whereas Japanese or Norwegian people think whales are the same meat as beef and pork. There is no answer to decide which opinion is justice. However, if nations’ activities give critical damages to environment, nations have to decide to stop their activities to preserve nature. And all of prohibition should be based on scientific facts but should not be decided by individual perspective. I have no particular idea who serve on WTO, but I think it shouldn’t be consisted of only few dominant countries.

The globalization of food supplies needs safety standards for food production and processing. Historically developed states tend to the take the harder blows from the transmission of

It is the job of the federal government to inspect meat, poultry, pork, eggs and other products in the processing or importation of these products for more than a century. Without this action, the public as a whole would be exposed to disease and unhealthy products. This extends from general cleanliness to the elimination of product pathogens, as we shall see.

As we know US went from being a net exporter to a net importer in a short span of time. Currently US economy is strong but with lots of debt. These changes in trade gap and debt were caused basically due to other developing nations coming up with low cost manufacturing system and thus US ended importing products from other countries. Also many US manufacturers moved their factories abroad due to cheap labor and other services. Some companies are considering reshoring and bringing at least some part of the process back to US as labor cost and other services are rising in other countries. This paper gives a detailed account of all the factors

Food safety regulations worldwide don’t align perfectly from one country to another, and there are food safety-related issues that arise as a result. Governments don’t all legislate it the same way because scientific evidence for the validity of specific policies isn’t all there is to consider—culture, history and politics included. These same things in tandem with pervasive fear and protectionism factor into how regulations solve certain problems.

In the recent years, business become more larger due to the advancement of technology, a renewed enthusiasm for entrepreneurship and a global sentiment that favors international trade to connect people, business and market. The economist emphasize about the international trade can increase the production of goods and service, increase the demand from the consumer in local or international, the diversification of goods and services and the stability in the supply and prices of goods and services. As a result, it becomes the main part of the international business and motivated countries to trade with borders. The United States implied the government intervention since the great depression through the financial sector rescue

The role of governments, for example, is to establish policies for food safety by means of a system of controls to ensure that these are met. The government, however, is not solely responsible to ensure that these safety standards are met. Indeed, an even more direct responsibly for ensuring food safety and acceptable standards lie with non-governmental entities, including all the operators within the food chain. Even consumers play a role in ensuring food safety standards by means of expressing concerns or requirements for the safety of the products that they consume.

Well-organized structure. There is clear defined stages and the fixed timetable to follow during the dispute settlement procedure. This dispute settlement system indeed become more effective than that of GATT 1947 (Food Fight n.d.), which is capable of dealing with complicated cases.

Taking to the account of Europe’s strict standards for consumer protection, for some TTIP oppositions (from Europe), EU policies for this matter must be the reference point for all trade negotiations. Food regulation structures in the EU and US every so often differ noticeably in terms of control systems, labelling standards, fundamental cultural, ecological and ethical values (Knoll, Zinke and Jaksche, 2013). Other issues such as the EU bans on genetically modified foods, EU raw milk cheese, hormone-treated beef, antimicrobial resistance, chlorine-washed poultry and food products

On August 11, 1952, the United States became the first non-member country to provide international recognition to the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to today’s European Union.

The World Trade Organization (“WTO”) Dispute Settlement System and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) are two of the most widely used methods of international dispute settlement.

Trade liberalization has been exploited international trade. Protectionism, dumping, national treatment and other unfair trades are destroying those victims as less developing countries. However, after creation, WTO has been doing its job to provide an efficiency, stable and accessible environment to international trades. Increasing of trade laws in dispute settlement as trade-related intellectual rights, countervailing measure, national treatment, anti-dumping and safeguard measure are evidences of their hard works. These rules are enforced through the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding mechanism (DSU).