Introduction . Unlike Adults Going To Trial Juveniles Have

The first piece of evidence of why juveniles should not be tried as an adult is found in the article “ Juveniles Don’t

The Declaration of Independence States that “we the people are created equally”. Based on that, the question of should juveniles be trial as an adult has risen in the society these children are being tried as adults while others are being tried as juveniles and receiving milder punishments. People hold certain inalienable rights that all human beings, “According to the U.S constitutional, meaning that all humans are naturally free to make our own choices and prosper juvenile offender may receive a few years in a juvenile detention facility and possibly probation following his release at age eighteen”. An adult

The defendants right against self-incrimination, is the essential mainstay of the United States adversary system and guarantees to the individual the "right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will," during a period of custodial interrogation as well as in the courts or during the course of other official investigations (Miranda v. Arizona 1966).

This case is about a 16-1/2 year old by the name of Michael and whether or not his Fifth Amendment rights were violated during his interrogation by the police; Michael was suspected of murdering Robert Younger in January 1976. Michael has had his fair share of the court system; he has been in and out of trouble since the age of 12 due to burglary and snatching purses. He had served some time in youth camp and he was currently being watched by probation authorities full-time. The reason why Michael was taken into custody almost a month later was because someone fitting his description was seen near Robert’s home and a truck registered to his mother was nearby. He was told why he was there, his Miranda rights were read to him and it is believed that he fully understood what was going on. The officers began asking him questions regarding the murder without the presence of his attorney, probation officer, or parents. I do not believe that this was right due to the fact that he was under age. Even though he may have committed the crime and was guilty, I believe someone should have been there with him (www.betheluniversityonline.net).

Juveniles by definition are not yet adults. They are incapable to speak in their own defense because studies have determined the emotional and psychological immaturity of juveniles makes them unable to speak in their own defense (McArthur 69). They have lawyers that speak for them and are appointed or hired to defend them. Children are less likely to control their impulses to guide their behavior than adults. They are still at the point of “growing up” (Human 77).

Unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court has approved such questioning of a minor in the absence of his or her parents. The police still have to give Miranda warnings if the minor is in custody and certain standards pertain to that consideration. In addition, any statement the minor gives must be voluntary and not the product of coercion and/or

The first factor that should be considered when deciding if a juvenile is competent to stand trial in adult court is the age of the juvenile. A juveniles age of is an important factor and essential for understanding whether the juvenile can understand their Miranda rights (Mayer Cox, et al., 2012). Juveniles understanding Miranda rights is fundamental in deciding their competency to stand trial since trial in adult court is the consequence of arrest and interrogation. How can a juvenile comprehend adult court trial procedures if they are incapable of understanding their Miranda rights? Age also serves as a comprehension of brain and developmental functions of the youth being referred to (Bryant, et al., 2005). On the off chance that the youth has not yet achieved the age of brain development where they can comprehend their actions and the penalties to follow, they won't be equipped for understanding court procedures and protect

understand that a juvenile has different demands than an adult when it comes to our criminal justice

Either to try individuals as adults or juveniles has evoked profound strife. I strongly believe that all individuals over the age 15 should be tried as an adult no matter the crime. According to the Justice Department, serious illegal offenses such as rape, assault, robbery with violence, and drug negotiation have increased among juveniles to 30% with 10% of all homicides by juveniles. To begin with, juveniles have the ability to plan a kill. As well as acknowledging that a crime by a juvenile is no different than a crime by an adult.

Juveniles have different rights at the time of arrest then adults have. There are also additional protections for juveniles that adults don’t have. In this paper I will compare and contrast the additional protections afforded to juveniles as compared to adult offenders, I will discuss a juveniles rights at the time of arrest, and my opinion on whether or not the additional protections afforded to juveniles serve the purposes of social and criminal justice. Juveniles have rights when they are arrested, however some of them differ then the rights adults have.

According to a report by a national research council panel “children and adolescents think, feel, and judge, differently then adults- often overestimating their grasp of the situation” (McCormic). If children and adolescents think differently, charging them and assuming they understand the situation in the same way adults do is an unrealistic expectation. A psychology professor Lawrence Steinberg says “in all likelihood, a large number of juveniles being tried as adults are not competent to stand trial” (Krikorian). Youths are often irresponsible during the courtroom they tend to act inappropriate, not fully understanding the results of their actions. This can cause them to worsen their own punishment just because of the lack of maturity they have.

Juveniles and adults have been segregated in just about every aspect of life for most of this country’s history. Juveniles are equal to adults, obviously, but they are not entitled to the same privileges and are not subjected to the same responsibility as adults are. But for some reason, juveniles must be considered as adults when it comes to the court system. Adolescents should definitely be punished for their inexcusable actions, but they still have lots of years of maturation ahead of them before they are fully developed mentally.

the standards for adults that adult have the right to have a public trial by jury and are the standards for juveniles do not. Juveniles do not have to face some of the serious consequences like most adults do. When adults are giving jail time or even giving community service hours for crimes they have committed. However, juvenile is sent to a rehad facility to get help so this crime will not happen again. Juvenile commits a delinquent act while adults commits a crime.

Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.

There was once a time in which juveniles were treated just as adults. There were no such things as juvenile justice system and there was very little progress in which was being incorporated. Originally the court process was informal, nothing more than a simple conversation between the