Inventory Costing Method Paper

Furthermore, according to the 2016 Annual Report, Woolworths’ cost of inventories is determined on a weighted average basis. The weighted average method is perceived to assume that items are of similar nature (Carlon et al. 2016). This method would lead to identical goods being allocated to the same price using the weighted average unit cost, which can then be applied to calculate the cost of ending inventory (Carlon et al. 2016). For this particular case, Woolworths Limited, as a commercial entity, regards the cost of inventory to be difficult to measure due to the high turnover rates and accessibility costs of different products.

Evaluate the role their inventory plays in the company’s performance, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction.

Cost of inventory is determined using the average method; inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. +pB13

inventory using the cost method and did not change the method used during the current

330-10-30330-10-30-1 The primary basis of accounting for inventories is cost, which has been defined generally as the price paid or consideration given to acquire an asset. As applied to inventories, cost means in principle the sum of the applicable expenditures and charges directly or indirectly incurred in bringing an article to its existing condition and location. It is understood to mean acquisition and production cost, and its determination involves many considerations. 330-10-30330-10-30-2 Although principles for the determination of inventory costs may be easily stated, their application, particularly to such inventory items as work in process and finished goods, is difficult because of the variety of considerations in the allocation of costs and charges.

“Companies can choose to use the accounting job order costing method when they have a single product line or numerous products to manufacture. However, it is less costly and less time-consuming if they elect to use process costing when calculating the manufacturing of a single product line. With similarities

2.2 Inventories (AASB 1019) as a general principle, inventories are valued at the lower of cost (including fixed and variable factory overheads where applicable) and net realizable value. Cost is determined on the basis of first-in-first-out, average or standard, whichever is the most appropriate in each case.

The second types of inventory methods to value its inventory that CVS uses is the most common one used for most business the First-In, First-Out (FIFO). First-In, First-Out (FIFO) is defined as the first inventories bought are the first ones to be sold. CVS only uses FIFO for Some Retail Pharmacy and Rest of Business (Front store). CVS utilizes this method because; the fresher products have to be out the door first. Also, FIFO is an easier method than Weighted Average Cost. And most importantly it may over inflate cost because the last products bought and out the door first are usually the most expensive products.

Last-In, First-Out is figured out by calculating the total amount of goods sold and removing them from the inventory at the cost of the last purchase made. In other words, the oldest products will be counted as inventory while the newest will be expensed.

I have taken it upon myself to test two inventory management systems and have found a system that will yield the least cost to Parts Emporium Inc. The two systems I have tested are the Continuous Inventory System and the Periodic Inventory System. Using data that I have gathered from the products DB032 and the EG151, I have compiled calculations and have concluded a continuous inventory system would be best for our corporation. Attached you will find said calculations; I would like to take this moment and present the continuous inventory system and recognize all of the relevant costs. The following is an explanation of each calculation under the continuous inventory system:

However, this system was found to be “ineffective for costing and bidding individual parts.” Id. While some machines produced low cost parts at high volume, other machines were producing high cost parts at low volume, which created cost discrepancies between various machines and thus misallocation of

INTRODUCTION Businesses – from manufacturing, merchandising and service industries alike – take careful consideration in the analysis of their costing systems in order to be able to set up competitive prices in the market. Misallocation of costs may lead to incorrect price estimates, continuous production of unprofitable products, and ineffective processing schedules. In this case study, we will discuss the costing methods which Zauner Ornaments have used or is currently using and, in conclusion, be able to distinguish the advantages and disadvantages of each costing method. CASE CONTEXT The case seeks to assist Zauner’s comptroller, Yu Chia-yi, in determining the best costing method for their overhead costs. In addition we also aim to

The current method of apportioning production overheads based on direct labour hours can be described as a traditional approach to product costing. In a manufacturing company’s financial statements, each item produced must be allocated some of the production overheads to make the statements compliant. Sometimes the individual costs of these items can be calculated incorrectly based on overall production overhead and the system of allocating in place, however the overall financial statement can still be accurate. This traditional method of allocating the production

Cost the availability of suitable price less cost to sell a larger number of products