Investigation of Natural Moral Law Essay examples

In his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Hume offers up a number of virtues and qualities which are valued for any of four reasons: they are useful to the individual, useful to society, agreeable to the individual, or agreeable to society. One of the qualities which Hume elucidates is justice. This quality, however, according to Hume, is valued solely for its usefulness and not upon any agreeability to anyone. Hume explains his position thusly.

While the author have attempted to present experimental support for many of his conclusions, his interpretation of empirical observations suffers from two primary defects. First of all, he underestimated the role of selection in shaping many aspects of morality; such selection influences moral decisions through biological and cultural mechanism, and could explain many phenomena that author claims to be accidental; second, his approach in distinguishing innate, intuitive moral sense from deliberated, rational moral judgment overlooked their evolutionary connections. As I will argue in subsequent paragraphs, rational and intuitive moralities may be the products of coordinated evolution; a reciprocal interaction between the two underlies moral development of a typical human being.

Brock Mason Brokerage firm had a number of noticeable issues that played close to fraudulent practices. The firm has an explicit strategy of selling their products first and all the other available products second. Such practice along with not spending a lot of time talking with customers, selling stock that is not in the best interest of the customers, false advertising, finding ways to elude disclosure of commissions, and withholding pertinent information from customers before selling the product sends the message of untrustworthiness and dismay to the customer. Most people search for a brokerage firm with the intent of building a strategic partnership to assist in making good financial decisions. Whether they need advice for

Act utilitarianism maintain that the correct action in any situation is the one that will have a result which brings benefit and more wellbeing to the most of people, than any other offered actions creates.

Is it immoral for a person to write lies on his/her resume? This question poses many questions in it's self. How fictitious is the lie, what are you lying about, what could be the consequences of this lie and whom and how will this lie affect the people involved? How would John Stuart Mill answer this question?

In fall of 2016, students from one of the prestige university in Korea called Ewha Womans University began to protest to discover the truth on one student’s irregularities in admission. The students questioned how could this one student be enrolled in such a prestige school with no qualification. After months of investigation, they found out the mother of the student used her authority to make her daughter enrolled in the university. Not only she used her authority on admission, but she also made professor to give her daughter good grades without attending the classes.

There are three ethical systems and they are known as antinomianism, situationalism, and generalism. “Antinomianism, which literally means “against/ instead of law,” holds that there are no binding moral laws, that everything is relative”. (Geisler, 2010) With antinomianism we would go against what laws and morals do exist. Some Christians fall to the belief in antinomianism mainly due to the fat that we sin and God forgives. “In the case of Christianity, the controversy arises out of the doctrine of grace, the forgiveness of sins and atonement by faith in Jesus Christ. If God forgives sins, what exactly is the disadvantage in sinning, or the reward of obedience?” (Theopedia)

Every person is seeking happiness, whether she knows this or not. Mill’s Utilitarianism outlines the facets of the philosophy of utility and arrives at the conclusion that happiness is the ultimate end which propels humanity. All our decisions, consciously or unconsciously, generate more happiness and minimize pain. Mill’s assertion is a bold one, as it serves as a universal thesis for all of the humanity 's behavior. The claim seems to boil down every person’s desires to one general idea: that we are all seeking happiness in some form or another. The justifications he uses include: explaining why every person desires happiness, how happiness has different components that people desire, and what constitutes desiring.

The only thing that matters is the amount of happiness and unhappiness that is caused. Therefore the right actions are those that produce the highest ratio of happiness over

Ethics: defined as a complex of moral precepts held or rules of conduct followed by an individual (dictionary.com, 2014). Non-commissioned officers and officers in the Army, find themselves facing ethical dilemmas on a daily basis. Some dilemmas are minute in nature, while others force Non-commissioned officers and officers into making questionable decisions. The Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report, or NCOER, is one of the most prevalent tests of ethical character, facing the enlisted rating chain. A leader’s failure in properly counseling a Non-commissioned officer accordingly will result in either a hastily generated evaluation or an evaluation the Non-commissioned officer does not deserve. The lack of effort on the part of the Soldiers rating chain to properly counsel, develop, and foster a Non-commissioned officers’ growth is unacceptable. Therefore, changes to regulatory guidance that one: forces the Soldiers rating chain to conduct required counseling sessions, and two: postures the sergeants major as an approving authority will circumvent the over-inflation of enlisted evaluations.

Law of Contract Michelle is at University, studying to be a veterinary surgeon. David, a close family friend is also a veterinary surgeon. Whilst away at University, Michelle received a letter from David, saying that he was due to retire in a few weeks' time and that he wondered whether she would be interested in buying his veterinary equipment for the bargain price of 500 pounds. His letter asked for a prompt reply as a junior partner in his veterinary practice was also interested in buying the equipment, albeit at a higher price. Upon receipt of David's letter, Michelle decided that she would like to buy, but she would need to borrow the money.

Would you describe a dog as capable of being evil? Or a cat? Or a chimpanzee? Most likely you could not. We humans belong to the taxonomic kingdom of Animalia and are therefore animals. Our species has evolved from animals that looked and acted more like the modern chimpanzee than we do. So at what point did we go from being creatures of instinct do developing the concept of morality? A great deal of literature has been written about morality, examples of which can be located in fiction and non-fiction as well as in scientific, theological and philosophical fields. Specific examples include the bible, as well as the writings of Plato (c. 424-348 BCE), Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) and John Steinbeck (1902-1968). Morality is a trait that

“Do what you believe is right.” This is a phrase common to us all, brought to our attention by parents, reinforced by teachers, and preached by leaders. But how does one define what is right? Is it what we believe in our hearts, or is it what we know is acceptable? This is a predominant dilemma that can be traced throughout society, and is the main focal point of Sophocles’ play Antigone. Written in 441 B.C., Antigone is one of the earliest records of the conflict between Natural law and Positive law. Sophocles deftly exposes these two philosophical standpoints and their respective moral and political aspects by way of the two main characters, Antgone and Kreon. Antigone is a champion of Natural

I can imagine a perfect world. A world where morality is of upmost importance in our dealings with each other, where morals are critically examined, and debated with reason as well as passion. This world would be a pinnacle of human achievement. A pinnacle that we are nowhere near. Why is this? Well, in today's society, morals are often associated with obeying the law, and since laws are legislated by politicians, they are subject to politics. Laws are not right in and of themselves, and morals are not a matter of a majority's opinion. Some matters that are in the domain of charity are done through politics, often citing morality as a reason. Where exactly does charity fit in with morals? With politics? In this paper I will explore the

of user in Land Law are still good law. Custom law can still be used