Investor Protection and Role of Sebi

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the US federal agency that holds the primary mandate to enforce federal securities laws and regulations to control the securities industry and the country’s stock exchange and regulation of all activities and organizations including the US electronic securities market. The SEC is committed to promoting a market environment that yields public trust characterized by integrity to attain its mission of protecting investors through maintenance of fair and efficient markets through facilitation of capital information (Basagne, 2010). The SEC financing is a major area of focus since there has been major concern regarding the SEC agency financing and whether they utilize the

The Securities and Exchange Commission has the mission of protecting investors by maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets. The SEC does this in a number of ways, and firms need to pay attention to these ways in order to ensure SEC compliance. The SEC has enforcement authority over a number of areas related to the nation's capital markets, including insider trading, accounting fraud, and providing false information. The SEC's jurisdiction extends to all securities that are traded publicly. Privately-held companies do not need to register with the SEC (SEC.gov, 2012).

In this paper the main focus will be on the clause of 'Liability to contemporaneous traders for insider trading' which is section 20A in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The paper will start off by giving some basic points that make up this section followed by the history and background of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The paper will then highlight the major impact that this act has made on the industry in the current global standing. Some of the basic points that make up the subsection 20A clauses include the following:

S718 states that a disclosure document to be used for an offer of securities must be lodged with ASIC.

The transition office has also established transition plans which will guide the new regulator with its anticipated regulatory approach, through its governance structure, organization design and implementation. Additional information provided by Department of Finance of Canada furthermore explained that once favorable ruling received from the Supreme Court of Canada, the government of Canada will introduce the securities act to parliamentary legislative process.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an agency created by the federal government to protect the investors and regulate the securities markets, as well as monitoring the corporate takeovers in the United States (Jones, 112). The SEC oversees security transactions, mutual fund trading, and activities of financial professionals to international deception and prevents fraud. With certain exceptions, the Commission has the authority to regulate trading and issuance of law securities that are offered to the public, it also requires the issuers to provide the investors with sufficient information in order to make informed

1)“insiders may not trade on a stock exchange upon the basis of material information until that information has been made available to the general investing public“(Feuerstein , 1970, p.30).

Insider dealing has been affecting the efficiency of stock markets in different places like United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Hong Kong is of no exception. Basically, insider dealing refers to the trading of a corporation’s stock or other securities by individual with potential access to non-public information of the company. The law of insider dealing in Hong Kong provides a much more detailed definition and is very comprehensive. However, when it comes to enforcement, it seems not very effective. In the following, the law of insider dealing in Hong Kong will be summarized. After analyzing the comprehensiveness of the law, the underlying reasons of the difficulty in enforcement will be identified. Some

The Securities Exchange Commision; also known as the SEC or the watchdogs of wall street, has many purposes to having established its government department. As first time investors turn to the markets seeking to secure their futures or even just financial growth, the SEC’s Investor protection mission becomes fascinating. Ironically, the stock itself isn't the only risky factor in today's marketplace. As the SEC oversees key participants in the securities world; their mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation.

The New York Stock Exchange has worked to become less exclusive to wealthy investors by opening itself to the public and allowing women to be on the exchange floor, something that was not allowed before 1943. Through its registration as a nonprofit organization and the government’s creation of the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange has worked to provide security for the public’s investments. Some of the security measures in place are requiring companies to provide detailed financial reports as well as financial operations. It has also worked to increase efficiency by upgrading technology to handle the workload of transactions that occur

Second, the seven new corporations would be highly independent, and therefore a major rearrangement of the capital structure would be vital. It is likely

Therefore, these concerns can only be handled after the company decides on the offering structure, which defines investor’s demographic and a precise stock exchange to list on. Afterward, the company and its underwriters must begin to prepare the required documentation for both potential investors and regulators. The main documents are registration statements and a prospectus which contains all the financial and non-financial information that potential investors require in order to make the investment decision. In most countries, the contents of the prospectus must be approved by the local securities regulators before it can be distributed to potential buyers. (Bodie et al. 2005,

Insider trading refers to the trading of a listed company’s stock or other financial securities by individuals who has access to non-public material information about the company. This action often occurs within employees/ex-employees of the listen company. Information is considered to be non-public material information if making it public would affect the price of securities, and using such information in decisions to buy or sell financial securities would be unfair to non-insiders (Bainbridge, 2013). Insider trading is treated as a mischief in more than 90 countries, and defendants are imposed with penalties (Beny, 2012). Specific insider conduct regulations in New Zealand were first enacted in 1988, followed by amendments in 2002, 2006 and 2008. The insider conduct regimes between 1988 and 2008 are often considered as a failure due to weak enforcements. Thus in 2008, the regulator introduced a new regime, which was a close model to the Australian insider conduct legislation. Both regimes are expansive, meaning it could be applied to any person in possession of insider information. However, while the Australian laws were aggressively enforced (more than 26 prosecutions were brought since then), no prosecutions have been launched under the new legislation in New Zealand. In addition, New Zealand also had no convictions secured prior to 2008, illustrating a clear enforcement deficit in the New Zealand

Securities regulations began when Congress enacted the Securities Act of 1933 in reaction to the 1929 Stock Market Crash—the infamous start of the Great Depression. The legislature created the 1933 Act to safeguard the economy from experiencing another event like the Great Depression. The objective of the Securities Act of 1933 was to “require that investors receive financial and other significant information concerning securities being offered for public sale; and prohibit deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities.” In other words, the Securities Act of 1933 required issuers to fully disclose all material information that a reasonable shareholder would require in order to make up his or her mind about a potential investment. The Act focuses on governing offerings by issuers and creating transparency between issuers and investors so that investors receive more protection than prior to the Act.

The objective of this study is to check whether the changes in structure of capital has impact on the overall value of the firms, and specifically in leverage ratio of firms listed in Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE).