Ip Cctv Network: Strengths and Weaknesses

Facial recognition is a technological product of the digital age that is continuing to evolve. The efficiency of the technology is an asset to crime detectives apprehending criminals, or the government tracking suspected terrorists for the safety of the country. It can also be used on a corporate level to allow a business to understand their ideal customer, or to increase the intractability of their website. While these abilities are positives to the people using them, the data collection may be harming more than it is helping. Considering the benefits of facial recognition, it is important for people to see what they are giving up for a more efficient experience. Facial recognition technology forces users to relinquish control of their own

The digital image of the face of a person can be matched against a record of other images by using face recognition software. In case that some of the images in the database go with the digitized image, the owner is reported about it by the system. Automatic face recognition has been studied and investigated extensively since 1990s and its usage is turning out to be no-nonsense in the present times. Although a number of automatic face recognition applications are relatively agreeable and harmless (access regulation to armaments, currency, illegal proof, nuclear equipment/supplies etc), there are still several dangers of face recognition systems that include violation of privacy and civil liberties, unrestrained exploitation, identity theft, illegal use of database, free access to personal data on social media etc. (Agre, 2001).

I concur with you on the use of biometrics by the government, and especially facial recognition to apprehend criminals. The recent rise in criminal cases can be halted if such a system is deployed. Biometrics can never go wrong and is in fact one of the most accurate ways of identifying people. If the government can be able to launch a system that can capture personal specifications, it can be really helpful.

Developed in the 1960s, facial recognition technology has been used by the government and companies to identify people by matching them to photos. The data for this software was originally entered manually, limiting the scope of use. By 2001, the novelty of more powerful facial recognition technology grasped the public’s attention. During the January 2001 Super Bowl, surveillance cameras captured images to find people with a criminal record (FBI 2013). This potential invasion of privacy under the pretense of public safety sparked a public debate about what private information the government was allowed to take from us. So should we be putting limitations on the use of facial recognition software in America in order to keep

It reasons that police cannot rely “solely” on facial recognition to make an arrest; however, this leaves a very dubious line regarding the extent of which they will rely on this software. Additionally, they argue that social media accounts will not be used in the database; however, they state that this will only be true during the pilot phase. This means that as the database becomes more widely used and exits the pilot phase, it will begin collecting more information about citizens not only in public, but also their personal lives and social media

This paper will take a look at all the setup needed for adding IP camera’s to our network and also have scalability of a little over 20 percent for future growth. The structure will begin at the access level and then we will look at the switches we will be using and then we will move onto the distribution and core levels switches.

One large reason these cameras should not be used is due to the costs. According to Jeff Roorada, who is the business manager for the St. Louis Police Officers Association in Missouri, outfitting the 100 largest police departments in the US would cost over 1 billion dollars.

and citizen. Body cameras will serve as a preventive method by reassuring the citizen and

To what extent should governments and companies be using biometric information obtained from facial recognition technology for surveillance and convenience in identifying individuals in society? This article discusses the legislature that must be implemented to protect our right to privacy. We will reach a conclusion by further analyzing the benefits and the risks of the new technology, evaluating the privacy issues that accompany, and discussing faults in the

Advantages * Keeps track of the offender so if he/she was to break the order they would soon be traced. * Helps prevent from re-offending.

Through this routine of advanced technology analysis, it has been established to increase the results and have hastened the procedure of identifying suspects of crimes. Facial recognition is also necessary for public involvement and observation as it also aids law enforcement officials to more easily zone in on possible suspects of a crimes being caught. With the use of facial recognition, it constantly has been proven quite an effective method with the incorporation of this technique.

Automatic face recognition has always been a major focus of research for a few decades, because of numerous practical applications where human identification is needed. Compared to other methods of identification (such as fingerprints, voice, footprint, or retina), face recognition has the advantage of its non-invasive and user friendly nature. Face images can be captured from a distance without interacting with the person, which is particularly beneficial for security and surveillance purposes. Furthermore, extra personal information, like gender, face expressions or age, can be obtained by further analyzing recognition results. Nowadays, face recognition technology has been widely applied to public security, person verification, Internet

Furthermore, Misuse of CCTV surveillance is not limited; Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes revealed his office opened 783 formal complaints during 2010, with more than 400 cases related to data security breaches. This is how day by day use of CCTV is increasing and misuse of it is also increasing so it will be better to reduce usage of this CCTV. There are so many issue in more developed countries due to high use of surveillance technology An article title of BBC new on 6 December 2005 “CCTV staff 'spied on naked woman'” Two council workers used CCTV

Biometrics is used in many places and there is a bright future for them. Coca Cola has recently replaced time card system with hand scanning machines. Finger print scanners are being used in many states of the US. They have been used to trace social welfare fraud. An iris pattern identification system is being used in Cook County, Illinois to ensure that right people are released from jail. ATM machines have been installed with finger scanners to prevent theft and fraud in Indiana (Jain, 2005).

INCIS (Integrated National Crime Investigation System) is a project that began in New Zealand from as early as 1985 but did not officially commence until 1991 when concepts and scope was being developed. INCIS was supposedly the solution to the problems of the Law Enforcement System at the time. The Law Enforcement System is better known as Wanganui Computer Center. The project was needed because the Wanganui Computer Center was aging and it was not efficient at storing information and data as well as having slow information retrieval times. The Wanganui Computer Center was nearing 15 years in age in 1991 this means that information, crime and policing needs have evolved and the system needed to evolve too in order to maintain effective policing of potential and committed crimes. The system used older programming languages and tapes to store information and data because of the combination of older programming languages and older technology to store information it lead to slower information retrieval as well as capabilities limits and crime fighting effectiveness. This project was a world’s first and was considered very high risk because of the fact that it was developing a system that had never been proven to work before. The purpose of the project is to develop an information system to support operational policing so the New Zealand police have the information and capabilities to minimize and prevent crime. The justification of the project