Iphone X Persuasive Essay

The term “Artificial Intelligence or AI” is no longer an obscure term to us. Being surrounded by smart and intelligent devices in our everyday life has made us aware about this technical jargon called “Artificial Intelligence or AI”, which is used to refer to machine intelligence in the field of Computer Science. As artificial intelligence continues to progress, machines are becoming smarter and more efficient than human beings. So, people are getting more concerned and apprehensive regarding their jobs after witnessing their jobs being replaced by robots and machines. Artificial Intelligence replacing human jobs frequently gets media attention and it has been made a huge deal even though it is not. AI gradually taking all our jobs and destroying the economic system is just an absurd and exaggerated claim made by few media outlets and self-proclaimed tech pundits. On the contrary, AI has potential to help us to get better at our jobs and create more job opportunities in the long run.

With the seemingly exponential propagation of inexpensive digital communications technologies over recent years, the general public is becoming more aware of the issues surrounding information privacy and government surveillance in the digital age. Every Tom, Dick, and Harry with a smart-phone has to be wary of how they use their private information for fear of that information being collected and used in a way contrary to their wishes. "Leaky" smartphone apps that transmit private information across the internet can be unethically used by government agencies. The issue of privacy is a balancing act; the public usually wants increased privacy and the government usually wants increased access.

Driven by increased concerns about government surveillance and consumer privacy, the technology industry has accelerated the deployment of advanced encryption technology for consumers and businesses. Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook has said that his company won’t even be able to comply with court subpoenas involving its iMessage

Those who sided with Apple in the “Apple vs FBI” case knew that if Apple was to unlock the iPhone, then the software that Apple used could also be used to unlock everyone else’s iPhones as well. Chenxi Wang proclaimed that “Apple is now viewed as the flag bearer for protecting citizen data” (Apple vs). People value privacy as a major asset that is best left undisturbed.

Millions of American citizens rely on Apple to protect their data. This data includes private conversations via emails and text messages, bank account information and location data. It is protected under a security system called encryption; encryption prevents criminals from accessing this important information. In the letter “A Message to Our Customers”,

To what extent should governments and companies be using biometric information obtained from facial recognition technology for surveillance and convenience in identifying individuals in society? This article discusses the legislature that must be implemented to protect our right to privacy. We will reach a conclusion by further analyzing the benefits and the risks of the new technology, evaluating the privacy issues that accompany, and discussing faults in the

What’s the first thing you think of when someone says, “Artificial Intelligence”? The Terminator? Perhaps the Matrix trilogy? Ever since the inception of the computer, science fiction has brought us scenes of super-intelligent computers who want to take over all of mankind. In reality, Artificial Intelligence is still in it’s infancy, and has done much more good for humans than bad. Over time, people’s perspective of AI has changed drastically. We have gone from thinking that AI will take over the world and obliterate mankind to thinking about all the benefits we can get from AI. The change in people’s perspective lately towards a more positive view of AI has boosted the production, sales, and advancement of home automation and AI, making

“I believe Apple should help the FBI unlock a terrorist’s phone. Although doing this risks customer privacy, it's the price we have to pay for valuable information that could keep us safe in the long run. The ideal situation would be for Apple to create a way to unlock the iPhone without deleting information just this once and keep the way to do this confidential.”

There has been on ongoing battle between the United States governments and Silicon Valley for years and the battle is only going to grow. These battles between these entities involve the security of iPhones and other devices and the government's desire to access these devices in certain cases. With the advancement of technology in the last decade there has been a valiant effort made by these Silicon Valley companies such as Apple to secure their devices and ensure to their customers that their data is secured.

What are the main arguments? The main argument of this article is the Apple company should allow access to iPhones owned by potential suspects in order to gain the necessary evidence required to solve and prevent future terrorist attacks. The point of the article is to inform readers of the the controversy over Apple’s security policies and why they should be amended for government purposes. The article covers, both, Apple’s rules involving consumer privacy and the various reasons as to why the regulations should be altered. To summarize, the Apple company

iPhone or galaxy that is the question, debating which device is the best to have is one of the daily discussions that goes around. This competition has been going around for several years, the two companies are head-to-head trying to create the most fitting tool for constant, everyday use. I believe that iPhone is the best device to have because the price is reasonable, the design is excellent and it has a smart system. I'm going to list 3 reasons why this is the mobile to have.

Personal privacy is a right that people should have; regardless of the government’s demands. Apple, the company, known for making the infamous iPhone and several other traditional electronic devices, doesn’t think the government should be allowed to break into their customer’s iPhones. Resulting in an intense prolonged legal battle between the government and Apple. The legal battle concerns a backdoor master key that would allow the government to see all personal data on a particular Apple device, regardless of the security measures that the customer has taken to protect their data. The legal turmoil between Apple and the FBI is getting rather heated. It also shows no signs of slowing down or reaching a conclusion. The FBI should not have

Nowadays, we are living in the modern technology life; therefore, our information usually is stored in Laptop, iPhone, iPad or can be shared on social network. That is why Apple created an un-crackable encryption software. I support that idea. My Facebook account used to be logged in by a hacker, and I could not log in into my account. Fortunately, I was able to regain that account through my email. Therefore, when I read Darrell Issa’s article “Forcing Apple to Hack That iPhone Sets a Dangerous Precedent” that was published in Wired Magazine, I extremely agree with the author. Issa wrote the article in response to the government who is forcing Apple to allow the FBI to un-clock the iPhone. While the answer has not been set, the author only hopes “lawmakers must be sure to protect citizens’ right to privacy and preserve the integrity of the online security protocols that help keep us all safe” (the article).

Apple has tipped the scale of technological innovations; however, they have gone too far. I do not support Apple’s adoption of their IOS 8 encryption to prevent law enforcement access to user’s information. Terrorist attacks rates have increased in 2015 compared to previous years. The United States and various foreign countries are fighting against a new terror organization called ISIS. ISIS is an Islamic terrorist organization which has made alleges to kill thousands of individuals worldwide, however primarily individual’s in the United States. News outlet such as FOX 5 and ABC news report on, ISIS threats and attacks on a weekly basis from tragedy stories to information regarding the organization’s development. In the article by David Sanger, the director of the FBI, James Comedy, said “What concerns me about this is companies marketing something expressly to allow people to hold themselves beyond the law. Terrorists will figure this out,” along with savvy criminals and paranoid dictators” (Sanger, 2014). Terrorist groups would be able to use Apple encryption to their advantage. Terrorist can use Apple’s IOS 8 to communicate among various devices that support IOS 8. Law enforcement officials would be unable to monitor or legally obtain these devices with a court order to prevent any potential attacks. For example, the recent terrorist attack against Paris is believed the terrorist “used the Sony PlayStation 4 to recruit for and plan the attacks. The report suggests that

Apple is firmly opposed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) request that they allow encryption of one particular iphone of a San Bernardino shooter. Apple came out with a statement that the government “attempts to rewrite history [1].” The company also wrote in its last court filing that “The Founders would be appalled [1].”