Iphone and Ethical Issues Essay

Now for the case that has kept the nation on the edge of their seats, we have Apple v. FBI. This has really split the nation as people are torn apart by wanting to side with the makers of their beloved iPhone or the government that has given many their freedom. This all started with a tragedy, unfortunately, the tragedy the San Bernardino shooting. After the terrorists were killed, the FBI obtained the iPhone from one of the shooters and believed that they could find more information in it. They turned to Apple in order to open up the phone, as iPhones are set to ‘self-destruct’ all data after 10 failed password attempts. Apple flat out refused. In a letter to the public sent out by Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, said, “Once the... way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.” This essentially is saying that someone could come along after the phone had been

Another argument given against Apple was that, by not assisting the FBI, they were risking the national security of the United States and preventing the government from gaining valuable information about terrorists. Although we do not know for sure what was on the phone, we do know that the phone the FBI was trying to break into was the work phone of one of the San Bernardino shooters, Syed Farook. Farook destroyed all of his other electronics before the shooting. Why would he destroy all his other phones, yet not destroy his work phone? Also how much information would actually be on a work phone, when Farook had numerous other personal phones on which to make his calls? These two questions are related. Farook most likely did not destroy his work phone simply because he did not believe that there was any important evidence on it. Therefore, by not helping the FBI break into the phone, Apple likely wasn’t threatening the security of the United States.

For example some officials claim that this software is necessary for their investigation of the San Bernardino shootings. After this incident that happened in San Bernardino, the company was asked to release a software update that would make it easier for the FBI to guess the iPhone’s password. This change would not only have led to the backdoor to millions of iPhone users and expose a lot of their privacy but it would also allow to the government the potential power to unlock any iPhone in possession. The true moral dilemma for the Apple Company was deciding whether to help the FBI break into the terrorist phone or protect their user’s privacy. This is especially hard because Apple is a company that has been known for protecting its user’s privacy, keeping this in mind the company did what was moral right for their customers and refused to follow the FBI’s proposal. Tim Cook the CEO of apple had stated in his letter their customers; “We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.” The ethical or moral issue in this case was whether apple did the right thing by protecting its customer’s

The momentum of obsolescence became increasingly stronger as the decades passed, and in contemporary society, the dynamics of planned, technological, and psychological obsolescence is unmistakable. Today, products are made of faulty parts, and have become gradually more expensive to repair. Consumers are now forced to weigh up the price of repair alongside the price of a replacement, giving them little choice but to pick the easier alternative and replace the item. An example of this modern triad of obsolescence can be seen within the “Apple Conspiracy”, where it is alleged that Apple releases software updates for iPhones that instead of enhancing the performance of the phone as promised, actually degrade it by making the phone slow, and decrease the battery life. Coincidentally, this often occurs when the newest model of the iPhone is released, prompting frustrated users to either upgrade their phone, or deal with a degraded product. The conspiracy’s major mainstream moment was an article in the New York Times by Catherine Rampell:

All in all, Apple did choose the right thing of refusing to hack into the iPhone. If Apple would breach the Phone, then they would break the constitution by going against the first and fourth amendment. Also, if Apple did violate the device, then it would have hurt the brand name. To avoid any other issues such as this one in the future we should amend the constitution or add laws that adjust to changing technology in the

“I believe Apple should help the FBI unlock a terrorist’s phone. Although doing this risks customer privacy, it's the price we have to pay for valuable information that could keep us safe in the long run. The ideal situation would be for Apple to create a way to unlock the iPhone without deleting information just this once and keep the way to do this confidential.”

This controversy will either cause Apple to do everything they go against or the government will put head on straight and instead of putting all of the citizens privacy in danger ,they will find another way to crack this phone.

The new iPhone can help safeguard your battery life that can be pressed with some product. Apple isn't simply diminishes the lights on your screen or switch off your 4G is not going to toss in a switch. They've got the arrangement is predictable with the perception of the conduct of every individual's specific utilization PDAs more.

As consumers of these smartphone products which have become embedded into our everyday lives we often overlook the idea that a higher up official can be looking into our personal day to day information. Furthermore, the possibility that may be staring into our eyes from the iPhone’s front facing camera. Our trust of personal privacy lands in the hands of the company for which we purchase our products from. Thus the iPhone has become a symbol of data privacy vs. national security (Preimesberger, 2016). Creating two sides of the argument, one side being those who value their privacy, and the other side being individuals such as the government who want to protect our nation from any threat. As consumers we have to trust the companies such as Apple

Privacy is something that a very important to people, and smart phones are also important to people in society today. The very popular phone right now is an iPhone, and Apple has made softwares where people can not hack into phones that easily. When a shooting occurred in San Bernardino, the FBI demanded them to hack into one of the criminal’s phone, but Apple refused. By refusing to the FBI’s request Apple has respected the rights of the people and their privacy.In the article, “PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” Expresses the fact that Apple has no right and should not let help the FBI in hacking a phone without the proper warrant.The Apple company now that the people have some private information and they are sticking to their word in keeping it private.

In todays world the delicate boundry between good and evil is a premise that is constantly being overlooked. Since when do we as Americans have to be so worried about our privacy? Well that began with the help of smartphones. Smartphones such as the Iphone created by Apple Inc. is a prime example a company that has loss sight of where they stand being right or wrong. Companies such as Apple insures consumers that their privacy is protected, however some expectations are to be made. Apple is one of the largest companies in the world, it does business with over 588 million users worldwide. A company of this stature in recent news has been bombarded and slandered due to its hypercritical behavior of releasing personal information of users of

Furthermore, there are 101 million users in the United States that currently have iPhones and millions more of foreign users outside the U.S . This case will affect a lot of consumers because if there was be a backdoor created, the FBI can have access to unlock your phone and surveillance every piece of your information. It’s a big deal to lots of consumers including tech companies because if the government has more power, they would take more control of our privacy and information of millions

Apple claims that the security policies for the phone relate to a physical object which can, therefore, be lost or misappropriated and consequently the physical device requires heightened security protocols;

The secondary market targets high school, college, and graduate students. For this market, it seems that the once popular iPod is now being replaced with the iPhone (1). We will examine the marketing mix: product, price, promotion, and place, to see if Apple is delivering the intended value to target customers. When researching the company’s environment, we will study the economic, political, cultural, technological, and natural forces in the company’s microenvironment (71). By researching all these aspects, we will get a better idea of how Apple continues to grow and market itself into a prosperous technological company. Apple’s iPhone interests us because it seems to be the cell phone that has the latest technical advancements, and can do more than just the average cell phone. By studying this company’s market perspective, we can get a better understanding of how Apple can continue to have the highest sales in the cell phone market.

The Wall Street Journal article was titled “iPhone 6s Review: A Slightly Better iPhone 6; the iPhone 6s addresses most of our smartphone complaints, but not the biggest--better battery”. The title alone shows support of the device and that it is improved from the previous models. In this article, the author addresses two of the major issues with the previous model, (IPhone 6), which