preview

Ir Spectra Lab Report

Good Essays

To analyze the product and confirm its molecular identity, infrared spectroscopy and proton NMR spectroscopy were conducted. The H1NMR produced a spectra (Figure 5) which was consistent with the predicted chemical shift from the hypothesized product. The presence of a multiplet centered on the 7 ppm region is indicative of the presence of protons bound to a benzene ring as would be expected in the desired product. This region also likely had some overlap of the hydrogen bound to the sp2 Carbon that occurred as a result of the aldol dehydration step. Furthermore, the fact that all remaining proton signals lie in the sp3 up-field region validates the probable formation of the desired product as no other functionality is present to cause a …show more content…

The experimental IR spectrum produced a weak stretch at just below 3000 cm-1, which can be attributed to the saturated carbon-hydrogen bonds present on the cyclic portion of the molecule. Additionally, a strong stretch at about 1700 cm-1 was observed indicative of the presence of a ketone. Furthermore, two stretches at 1600 cm-1 and 1500 cm-1 respectively were observed that indicates the presence of an aromatic ring. Finally, a stretch observed at about 825 cm-1 suggests the presence of a para substituted benzene ring. When the information in the IR spectrum is coupled with that from the H1NMR and the fact that spectrum from the starting materials (Figure 7) do not match, it can be concluded that the reaction was likely successful in yielding the desired …show more content…

To examine this, the theoretical yield was determined and recorded as 0.6127 grams. Then the actual product was massed to determine the actual yield and documented as .1041 grams. This results in a percent yield of 16.99%. While this is a very yield and appears to highlight the inefficiency of the reaction there are likely several errors that contribute to these appearant inefficiencies. First, several TLC samples were removed from the reaction while it was in progress and an additional sample was removed to confirm the completion of the reaction. Next, more product was removed in order to obtain an IR and H1NMR spectrum and confirm the identity of the product. Additionally, the liquid-liquid separation technique is not a highly efficient method of extraction and thus likely resulted in the loss of some product. Furthermore, the product was transferred between reaction vessels several times in order to remove residual water and undergo rotary vaporization and in each of these transfers it is likely that a small amount of product was

Get Access