preview

Iran Contra Affair Research Paper

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Iran-Contra Affair The Iran-Contra affair is one of the largest examples of what occurs when government communication breaks down. Within this communication breakdown, simple negligence over details or issues can create scandals that otherwise would not happen. This rocked the nation in the 1980s and is undoubtedly one of the largest scandals in American history. The Iran-Contra affair consists of two different situations that are linked simply by money. The Contra portion of the Iran-Contra affair began in Nicaragua where the United States continued to be involved in the matters of other countries. In 1979 the Sandinista socialist group was able to take power over the previous dictator Somoza Garcia. With this the US became nervous, …show more content…

Nevertheless, there were still loopholes and various ways for the US to support the Contras. Mainly through the contributions of third-party funds and private actors, the US supported the Contras. Next, Congress passed the Second Boland Amendment which barred the CIA, Department of Defense, or any other US agencies to be used to support the Contras in Nicaragua. Once again, there were multiple loopholes for the Reagan administration to use in Nicaragua. The loopholes were the use of third-party funds and private donors while also using the National Security Council. The National Security Council is the President’s personal group that he can use when considering national security and was not subject to the Boland Amendments. The leaders of the National Security Council during the Iran-Contra affair were John Poindexter and Robert McFarlane. Within this National Security Council, third party funds were used for arms deals, air supply operations, and intelligence support while also using the CIA only as an intelligence provider for the Contras. Over time, Congress then loosened its opinion on Contra funding and began to provide funding to the Contras for humanitarian assistance while also allowing the State Department to solicit funds. This also led to the CIA being allowed to provide training to the Contra rebels. This whole portion of the Iran-Contra affair was …show more content…

Within these hearings, many individuals involved were questioned extensively, in particular, Oliver North and John Poindexter. Immediately after the Iran-Contra affair was leaked, Oliver North and his secretary worked to destroy as many documents related to the affair as possible. However, North missed a key document in which he described his entire plan of using funds from arms sales to Iran to support the Contras. Also after the leak, North was removed from the National Security Council and sent back to the marines. At his trial, Oliver North wore his green military uniform with his medals. Within the trial, North admitted to shredding documents and admitted that he was a central figure in the operation, but said that he also had asked for approval from higher figures. North was eventually pardoned by George W. Bush. The other main trial involved John Poindexter, the leader of the National Security Council who resigned when the story was leaked. In his immunized testimony, Poindexter took full responsibility for the affair and said that all information had ended at his line in the chain of command, and that nothing had been said to Reagan. Poindexter also said that he believed diverting funds was legal as it helped the large political goal of aiding the Contras, and that President Reagan would have supported the operation had he known about it. This lack of attention was a major flaw during Reagan’s

Get Access