Irony In 'The Most Dangerous Game'

With New York Times bestselling author Thomas C. Foster has introduced literary devices to help annotate and understand deep thinking when reading. Likewise, Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” has examples of statements made by Foster on literature. The short story is about a hunter goes through the perspective of someone being hunted. Remarkably, literary devices provided by Thomas C. Foster accompanied a different understanding of the short story, The Most Dangerous Game.

“Rainsford said,Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.’” (Connell 70). Rainsford’s personality changes throughout this story, but, the trait of bravery stays true throughout the story. Through his personality trait of bravery Rainsford moves the “Most Dangerous Game” plot forward.

“The world is made up of two classes - the hunters and the huntees.” In the short story ‘The Most Dangerous Game’ which was written by Richard Connell there are two main characters, Rainsford and General Zaroff. Rainsford thought that General Zaroff wanted to hunt with him when in all reality General Zaroff wanted to hunt him(Rainsford) himself. Richard Connell uses irony, theme and characterization to develop the plot and characters. The use of these literary devices suggests that Connell wanted to make the story more interesting and suspenseful so the reader can enjoy reading it.

Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous explains multiple theories, such as nature versus nurture, and survival of the fittest. This short story also seems to have an underlying theme of Social Darwinism (Of Two Classes). Throughout the entirety of the short story, Connell shows a character change of a main character, Rainsford, who is at a constant battle with General Zaroff, the antagonist. This character change shows the importance of the mindset of characters, and how it can be applied to everyday life.

Underestimation and cruel actions lead to many things. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” author Richard Connell reveals a conflict between the main characters, General Zaroff and Rainsford. Rainsford was to play the most dangerous game created by Zaroff, because the only way to survive, is to win it, otherwise death is the only other option. As demonstrated through the use of personification, symbolism, and repetition in the story, it conveys that one should understand to never underestimate another person and remember that there will always be a consequence for the wicked things that one has done.

The Most Dangerous Game Argumentation Paragraph In the story, The Most Dangerous Game Sanger Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff for many reasons. For example, when Rainsford and General Zaroff are having a conversation about hunting over borsh shortly after Rainsford had found the General's home, the General tells him what he hunts and Rainsford states, “Hunting? Great guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder!” (Connell 5). This piece of evidence is important because Rainsford figures out General Zaroff is hunting people. Because the General is killing many people, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because he is killing other people just for the fun of it.

"The world is made up of two classes - the hunters and the huntees.” In the short story The Most Dangerous Game which was written by Richard Connell there are two main characters, Rainsford and General Zaroff. Rainsford thought that General Zaroff wanted to hunt with him when in all reality General Zaroff wanted to hunt him(Rainsford) himself. Richard Connell uses irony, theme and characterization to develop the plot and characters. The use of these literary devices suggests that Connell wanted to make the story more interesting and suspenseful so the reader can enjoy it.

Presumption of one’s character, lifestyle, or troubles in life is taken from looking at that person and assuming you know all about them. In order to fully understand someone’s pain, you must endure it in their shoes. This is the theme for the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” written by Richard Connell. As Rainsford, the main character of the short story, tries to survive in the wild from a psychotic general who hunts humans as game, the reader sees his change in perspective on what it feels to be hunted. This demonstrates the theme of the short-story through the use of situational irony, man vs. man conflict, and internal conflict.

Imagine being on an island, with no laws, no society, just the need to survive. When a normal hunter is going to Rio to hunt, the story takes a wild turn and ends up inverted, with the hunter becoming the prey. This is the plot of Richard Connell's short story, ”The Most Dangerous Game”, this short story was unique and interesting to most readers because of the series of unfortunate events. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, man vs. man, along with man vs. self can lead to an unexpected resolution.

People are like onions; they have several layers and consist of a bitter core. In consideration of this reality of human nature and reality of a man-made society, “The Most Dangerous Game”, written by Richard Connell, reveals these dangers. It unveils the truth about blood lusting hunters and defines the meaning of civilization. In the story, just like in the real world, so-called rules and laws are made to suppress and dignify human savageness. Here, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are two essential characters—capable of virtuous actions, yet prone to decisions that reflect immoral tendencies, and so; a message is conveyed: without the practice of morals and consequences, corruption of man is inevitable.

One of the most relaxing things to do is read a good story. In the stories there are interesting elements such as suspenseful events, interesting characters, and deep themes. Here are examples of important literary elements in stories.

“Empathy is about standing in someone else’s shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes. Not only is empathy hard to outsource and automate, but it makes the world a better place.” Daniel H. Pink’s quote relates to Richard Connell’s fictional short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” where the main character, Rainsford, learns to grow empathy to others situation and feelings. Connell uses this short story for readers to grasp a deeper concept besides just a fun read while connecting with Thomas C. Foster informative literature How to Read Literature Like a Professor; For Kids.

In the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" Rainsford does not apply to the quotation, "Character is what you are in the dark." Dwight Lyman Moody. This quotation is saying that people act different when they are by themselves and that they are acting as themselves not what they think others will enjoy to be around. Rainsford is not like this what so ever, he acts as himself throughout the whole story and shares his own opinions and thoughts. When by himself he seems to act the same also. Rainsford acts the way he wants to act not caring what others think, he is very out spoken. Rainsford doesn't apply to this quote, in fact he is the opposite of this quote.

The prompt is saying to state what survivor might mean in your own words and to write an essay explaining what survivor’s meaning is using past readings and or personal experiences. Some of the past reading that are will be used in this essay is “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Carroll which is about a man named Rainsford trying his best to survive from a man who hunts humans as animals. What a survivor is someone who is brave, smart, and lucky.

Irony and imagery are both important writing tools, used to guide the reader through the story while keeping them engaged and thinking about the story complexly. When used together successfully, the reader can walk away with something to think about, a new perspective on something they might have thought different about before. When considering this, I would argue that “The Most Dangerous Game,” is overall a better story than “The Necklace”.