Irving Coffman Analysis

Human activity can negatively impact on the environment in different ways, which can lead to consequences which are not only bad for the environmental area affected, but humans too. Activities such as causing radiation leaks with nuclear meltdowns and dumping waste are just some examples of how humans can worsen their own environment.

It also affects our dealers and distributers as well. Other companies may be eyed for replacement of like products by our customers, costing us millions in revenue. At the same time, our customers are smart and believing in a company that ensures our products meet Federal and State guidelines for the safety of their kids may bring in millions more.

If we look at the tobacco industry we clearly see that the manufactures that make tobacco products help fund and provide research on the use of their product, not hinder it. We the people have access to that information, and our right to choose whether or not we use tobacco products remains in our hands.

I find it interesting how the class has evolved from simply reading about maps of cities, birds eye view, ballooning, and now to a view from space. This shows how much the world has grown and technology has increased throughout many centuries. With this new space view people can see weather patters; such as, they can watch as hurricanes form. This new view makes me think of a cosmopolitanism mindset, because every human is on the same landmass. As stated in the reading by Denis Cosgrove, two important photographs were the Earthrise and the 22727. The reading by Laura Kurgan complements Cosgrove’s reading. Kurgan talks more in-depth about the two images made from space and their political/social impact. In conclusion, Kurgan brings up that

Companies are in business to make a profit so why would they lose so of it on paying fines for not following regulations set forth. This is a problem with deterrence is that some companies make so much money they can afford to pay the fines or some may not get caught. The biggest thing for companies to determine whether or not to pay fines for polluting is the cost vs benefit analysis. Companies often have to get permits for certain kind of work and these permits could be revoked and can come with fines for violation them. Some states fail to maintain these permits to a level that is required and often impose little fines. Companies could also find loopholes in certain permits letting them get around certain fines for a certain amount of time. In Florida, “If it is cheaper to illegally pollute a local river than it is to invest in cleaner technology and pollution-control equipment, that is exactly what many companies will do” (Baliga, N) If you think about it, bringing in new technology to control pollution could cost millions upon millions of dollars which would

On Tuesdays Aug 27, 2015 Scott Coffman and I Meant with Carl Rossman Vice President for Administrative Affairs follow up meeting for Aug. 12 ,2015 . Mr . Rossman , Insinuated I didn't follow the chain of command which isn't true I have Emailed and meetings with Bob Hoffman and Joseph Bleehash Director of maintenance, William Fanicola Supervisor ,Mary Ann Koleny Director of Human Resources. The university had Robert Hartman Human Resources Senior Administrator, Jane Volk Employee/Labor Relation assist in an investigation which I was directed to contact them with addition information. However ,When Bob Hoffman and Joe Bleehash ,Director of maintenance couldn't direct Julie Godzik about her harassing behavior I did involved Police Chief Gillilan

2005). Exposure to the contamination can lead to future health issues. For instance, the development to brain tumors, brain cancers, kidney cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia as well as reproductive effects such as birth defects, fetal death, and intrauterine growth retardation. This is just one of the many problematic issues pertaining materials used for clothing.

was 35.1 billion dollars. With a product that kills so many of its customers, your only concern in this industry is to increase sales and make a profit. Definitely in the tobacco industry and most others, it is my opinion that you cannot cater to the best interest of both the company and the consumer. Even a good company with the best intentions will eventually come to a crossroad where choosing what is best for one will not have such a great outcome for the other. Their best interests will ultimately conflict, and you will be forced make a choice between the two.

In the passage, Coffman presents the argument that other companies should have the consequences that major tobacco companies had of paying a financial settlement in the field of “legal but harmful products.” Other products are alcohol and gun companies of which Coffman believes to be in the category of legal but harmful. Other manufacturers should not have to pay a financial settlement because of the idea of self-determination, and that a financial settlement does not resolve the conflict.

Consumerism often causes people to identify with a product or brand on a personal level. Certain products have come to represent different levels of society, with swankier products like muscle cars indicating high class and such products as generic “store brand” shampoo indicating low class. People feel that they have relationships with their favorite brands and products and define themselves by what they buy and own. The mass production of cheap products uses precious fossil fuels at an alarming rate. This has an obvious negative impact on the environment.

“The idea that nature can harm us is not new. Have you ever heard of malaria, HIV, tuberculosis, botulism or tetanus? Why, then, are so many convinced that anything and everything natural is healthier for us than synthetic products? It 's true that modern chemistry has brought us a number of toxic chemicals, like DDT and dioxins, but do you really think that nature 's chemicals are any less

Many scientific researchers have said that our environment has been filled with toxic chemicals, which us humans have had a part of. There are many different issues that should concern us surrounding these toxic chemicals. The major concern is that many of these toxic chemicals have been claimed to be causing damage to the health of humans and even other life forms. Another concern is that most of the theses toxic chemicals have just recently been produced; and by our environment changing everyday there is no telling what effects these toxic chemicals may have in the long run on the public 's health. Just about all of these toxic chemicals exist in the way they do because of humans. As humans we practice a lot of different activities that cause toxic chemicals to pollute our environment such as, agriculture, industrial, and many domestic activities as well. Many of the toxic chemicals that we produce and use don 't get used in a effective way, which causes them to be wasted, left abandoned, and disposed of. When toxic chemicals are not disposed of properly they effect the environment and the public 's health in a negative way.

can only do harm in this situation of our enviroment. Increasing pollution of these chemicals are

Pollution has become a prevalent issue worldwide and has begun to affect the air used to breathe, the soil used to grow food, and the water used to drink. All of these effects result in commonly occurring destruction of health and wildlife that one may have seen on the news or heard from peers. In order to live, one needs food, water, clothing, and shelter. If the water and food that society consumes gets contaminated, a major component of life has been eradicated, which can only have negative consequences. If more people are educated as to what effects the environment, the world has a chance to counteract the effects of pollution. The main causes of pollution are the burning of fossil fuels such as with car exhausts, littering as a result of societal norms and laziness, and factory waste as a result of lax waste regulation, and can result in mass destruction of the environment and catastrophic effects on the everyday lives of contemporary people.

In today’s society chemicals, whether you like it or not are a fact of life. Many people are afraid of chemicals and their effects on them and the environment. This is understandable because the truth of the matter is that chemicals can do some horrible things to humans, animals and the whole ecosystem. Some would say that chemicals should be done away with for these reasons. But this certainly is not true and most likely impossible. Chemicals can also have some very positive effects on our lives. Some uneducated people would argue that there should not be restrictions on chemicals. This is just as crazy as saying that chemicals should be done away with. If chemicals are regulated and people abide