Is Affirmative Action Fair?

This poem is a tribute to the well-known abolitionist Frederick Douglass, and gives a cause and effect analysis of the allowance of freedom to African Americans. For this reason, this poem can be interpreted very specifically to the African American struggle for civil rights and search for the true understanding of attaining freedom. The sense of exclusivity in this poem can come from lines such as, “…this man, this Douglass, this former slave, this Negro….” (1067) The words presented in this line such as “Negro” immediately strike the reader as specific to the African American race, and, therefore, transforming the entire poem into a poem directed toward a specific audience. The struggle for freedom post-emancipation was uniquely highlighted in this poem. African Americans still felt extremely subservient in relation to the white population, and Hayden clearly noted that feeling in this strong piece. The piece can solely be seen as a tribute that offers relatability for those African Americans of the time period. It can also be interpreted as a relatable piece for African Americans of any time as related to the historical essence of their lives. This piece may seem exclusive, but it can also offer much

Affirmative action was created to increase the number of people from certain social groups in employment, education, business, government, and other areas (LaNoue, G., 2010). This policy is geared toward women, and minorities such as African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians, and disabled people. Generally speaking, Affirmative Action was put into place to benefit groups that are thought to have suffered from discrimination. Some believe that affirmative action is just a means for minorities to get ahead, but the benefit is for minorities to first of all

From an ethical standpoint, both arguments are fair, however, adherence to Affirmative Action policy is an ethical responsibility of public sector employment. According to principal four of the American Society for Public Administration, Code of Ethics; government employees must “Promote affirmative action and other initiatives to reduce unfairness, injustice, and inequality in society” (Svara, 2014, p. 565). Therefore, Affirmative Action is the best policy for government hiring practices, as it instills a check on an otherwise arbitrary hiring system – where a hiring manager could simply decide not to hire women or minorities. Without Affirmative Action serving as a check on hiring power, it’s possible the levels of diversity

Affirmative action is a rather complicated subject that is packed with nuance. It can be difficult to fully assess whether affirmative action is a good thing when discussing it in terms of what is just and what is unjust. Professor Michael J. Sandel argues in favor of affirmative action. However, the arguments he uses when presenting his case are not particularly strong.

On the contrary, supports of affirmative action feel that this law is still needed in America to help places of higher education have more diversity which will benefit companies in the long run and it also helps companies be more diverse and it helps them thrive. In the past few decades the number of minorities and females in places of higher education and companies have been rising at a slow rate. During 2012, the health care industry was suffering from lack of medical personal in the medical field; however, “16% of the U.S. population is Latino and 14% is African American, these groups constituted only 9% and 7%, respectively, of the total U.S. medical school enrollment in 2012 “(Graces, paragraph 2). The rate of minorities enrolled in medical school has been slowly rising over the years. Having minorities and females in a company helps the company be more diverse while also giving the company employees that can help the company thrive and be successful. Supporters feel that this law benefits people who usually would not have a chance of attending a place of higher education or be a part of a company an equal and fair chance. Supporters of affirmative action feel that it is positive discrimination and that it benefits places of higher education and companies not discriminate against females and minorities.

Is affirmative action immoral? Affirmative action is a way to ensure that diversity is obtained and maintained in schools and in the workplace. In so doing it also helps create tolerant communities because it exposes people to a variety of cultures and ideas that are different from their own.. It is a measurement designed to make sure that institutions do not wrongfully discriminate and to improve diversity within the institution. So, does this make affirmative action moral? On paper, affirmative action sounds like the perfect solution to combat racism and discrimination among women and minorities, but unfortunately it is not working the way it was designed to. I believe that affirmative action programs, though designed to be moral and ethical,

Affirmative Action gives too much power to the minority population. I think this is unfair to the white people. There are governmental laws that require businesses to have a certain number of minority workers in their workforce. This discrimination affects the common good because it could very much stop me from getting a job when I’m sixteen; it limits white citizen from working in jobs they are qualified for because other minority races have special privilege. According to the equal protection act in the 14th amendment it states”. No state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction "the equal protection of the laws” i think that the laws should be changed.

Some experts have formed the opinion that affirmative action plans are no longer needed. Others have reached the opposite conclusion. Affirmative action is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, in relation to employment or education. Affirmative action plans are designed to facilitate workplace success for members of the groups they target (women, ethnic minorities), yet ma have ironic effect of stigmatizing AAP targets and, in turn decreasing their performance outcomes (Leslie, Mayer, & Kravitz, 2014). I lean towards those who still feel affirmative action is still needed. Affirmative action is needed because the policy balances the obstacles that minorities and women face in pursuing education and employment

Affirmative action is good and bad. It helps to make sure that the people who can’t do school as well as others because of their language or childhood get into college. It’s bad because the people of the majority race can’t go to college and get educated in their major. You should not allow people in college by their ethnicity. Instead use grade systems, not what country you are from or the color of your skin.

Imagine this, you are a 4.0 average student who finally graduated high school and is looking on to Harvard. You sent in your application positive of your spot. Then it comes. They denied you. The only explanation you have is that they replaced you with another student. One that got through with a race program. That is affirmative action at work, ruining young adult’s lives. Affirmative action is a policy favoring the minority and those who tend to suffer from discrimination. Genuinely is affirmative action appropriate for modern day civilization? The answer is no. The government should no longer use Affirmative action for college admissions. It creates excess diversity in the community, it is

Affirmative action is the practice of improving the educational and job opportunities for members of a group that have been treated unfairly in the past because of their race or skin color,sex,religion, etc. I support affirmative action in theory,but I am not happy with the way it is been executed. If affirmative action has been executed the way it is been theorized,they would be no need to analyze this question. Getting admitted into college because of a person’s race is the same as saying a man gets paid more than a woman when they work at the same company and work the same hours. That is completely unfair.

A moral being is one capable of conforming to the rules of right conduct, but a big question that follows concerns the idea if there even is such a thing as “right conduct.” “Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something admitted to be good” (Mill 6). In John Stuart Mill’s book, “Utilitarianism,” he states this notion where an individual assumes good things are good without knowing why they’re good.

The policy has shown great difference of discrimination in the United States which proves that having the Affirmative Action Policy is necessary as it has its strengths and weaknesses that affect the citizens of the United States of America (Brunner, 2001).

Affirmative action in this time and place is a very hard area to keep in place when it comes to keeping jobs even at work for the employees. Sometimes this type of equality in the working world can be good and sometimes it can be bad, but it depends on how it is used that really makes how a person can feel when it comes to this type of treatment of employees no matter what color or sex a person is during this time period.

“Affirmative action” means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded. Indeed if one were to see affirmative action in the light of John Rawls’ maximin approach to give the greatest benefit to the least advantaged in society, it would seem to be a just and fair way to organise society. Hence it’s no surprise that affirmative action is prevalent in many countries today principally to ameliorate the disenfranchised in the society to become ‘full partners’ in the society.