Is Animal Testing An Ethical, Or Unethical?

Cohen argues that humans may morally use animals for biomedical research, the study of biological processes and disease, because animals lack rights. He defines rights as moral claims that one human can hold against another, which are bound in both law as well as in comprehension of right and wrong. As animals lack self-conscious placement in a higher ethical order with the ability to weigh needs of self against the needs of others, they therefore lack the ability to have rights. (Cohen 1986: p. 215) To support the morality of animal research, I will show how it has led to many successful treatments of disease in humans, due to the common physiology that we share with other animals. Furthermore, I will argue that the pain caused on research

The testing of animals in scientific and commercial research has been debated for many years. Some people view animals as companions or part of the family, but others think of them as a way to advance medicine by providing researchers with a means to develop better medical techniques, discovering vaccines, and helping to find a cure for a disease. Regardless of how a person may view animals, they are worthy of better protection by our government and us as a society. Although some animal testing has been successful, there are research alternatives that could eliminate the pain, suffering, and deaths that animals endure in scientific research. Therefore, animals should not be used in scientific research

Animal testing is very wrong, but at the same time is right. I personally think is very wrong. An estimate of 26 million animals is tested every year in the United states for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, to see how medications work, to check the safety on products made for humans, and for health care uses. Experimenting on animals was happening since 500 B.C. Some people think experimenting on animals is cruel and wrong. Also that animals are so different from human beings. In other hands, people say they are able to develop numerous life-saving treatment for both humans and animals.

Experimenting on animals is inhumane. According to PETA, every year in the US, 100 million animals including rodents, frogs, dogs, primates, and more are killed. This shows that testing isn’t for the common good, it does more harm than help. Scientists are allowed to burn, shock, poison, and do even more to the animals. Not only are they being physically hurt, often killed, their emotional needs are not met. Often times they are isolated from any other animals and humans, crammed

As I have progressed through this journey, I feel as though I have gained a much greater insight into an issue, which is of far bigger global concern than I had initially realised. The basis of this investigation was to examine the social and ethical perspectives on animal testing and within that the tendency for human beings to classify and categorise forms of life, placing themselves at the top of the ladder. Through the use of primary and secondary methodologies I have been able to appreciate many differing opinions, ranging from passionate objections to uncertainty and then those in full support of continuation.

Therefore, animals should not be used for animal research. Animals suffer emotionally experimenters waste their lives when they do nothing and they do not even improve human health. Society should get rid of animal testings because people are basically murdering these animals. They did nothing to anyone, but yet they kill them for no reason. Researchers waste their money and time on “finding cures” but yet they are killing others’ lives while they are at it. Society must figure out another way to research medical testings on

For centuries, the ethics of animal experimentation in the biomedical field have been questioned. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain the animals endure? Animal rights activists will argue there are new alternatives that there are more accurate than animal testing. The success of trials on animals, has led to the continued use by scientists within the medical field. Additionally, testing on animals instead of humans puts humans out of harms way. The first Animal Cruelty Act was created in 1835 to regulate the use of animals for scientific purposes. According to Franco (2013), the “Enactment of the 1986 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, remains the only known legislation to regulate animal experiments for nearly 50 years.” Even so, there will continue to be two sides of animal research, one side believes, without animal research there would not be the medical advancements present to this day. On the other hand, the use of animal research is unethical and the finding of new alternatives may also be even more beneficial than animal testing. Therefore, the medical field should either seek alternatives to animal research or the methods are refined to reduce the unethical treatment towards the animals as subjects.

The FDA’s “Animal Rule” establishes certain guidelines for drugs that are tested on animals before their approval be cause testing these drugs on humans would be unethical. The Animal Rule “Drugs intended to ameliorate or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions due to other toxic chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear substances… may be eligible for development under the Animal Rule when… field trials to study effectiveness are not feasible.” The Animal Rule establishes what processes are recommended to make sure that the animals used and the experiments conducted are accurate and safe.

should animal testing be justified? Millions of animals die each year due to scientific research into the effects of drugs, cosmetics, and other chemical products. It is estimated that more than a hundred million vertebrate animals such as mice, rats, birds, and much more had been victims of animal testing annually worldwide. Most of animals that undergo testing are inhumanly killed. Although most people thing that animal testing is necessary, others are upset of this inhumane act. Animal testing can be both useful and cruel at the same time.

Humans have been using animals to do tests and researches for a long time, but nowadays these kind of testing are being questioned. There are many types of research such as pure research, which is used to genetics and developmental biology researches; and applied research which involves drug testing, cosmetic tests and toxicology tests. The applied research is the most questioned for its cruelty with the animals since there are lot of tests that make the animal suffer or even die. So the question is: should the animal test be allowed? Although some people are extremely against to animals testing, some of these test can save lives. Which is why people should questioned it, but not end it completely. In other words, animal testing has its advantages and problems.

Some people believe that the knowledge gained from the animal research is useful in large fields, from vaccinations and organ transplantation to different surgeries and for the prevention, treatment, cure, and control of many diseases. However, others believe that animals are a different species, “in fact, animal 'models' have never been validated” (Results from Research on animals are not valid when applied to humans, 2015) to be used for research in human treatment, and human beings do not have the privilege of complete authority over other animals, and dictating which animals deserve to live or die. They consider animal experimentation to be morally as well as scientifically

Animal testing has many debates about this topic. Is it an awful thing that should be banned, or is it something that helps the human community? There are multiple types of animal testing. Some testing is when you put an animal like a rat in a maze to see how fast they can find the food. Others like in cancer prevention research centers use animals such as guinea pigs and give them cancer, then give them new types of medicine. I say the animal testing is okay in certain circumstances. Animal testing is justified when it is used for medical research.

Animal research has played a prominent role in scientific and medical advances for many years. Due to the development of new medicines and treatments, people throughout the world enjoy a better quality of life. However, scientific and medical use of animals have been a subject of heated debate for many years. Those who support animal research and experimentation justify their stance based on the medical advances that improve human lives.

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.

It's Friday night and you are ready for a night out with your friends, you already applied cosmetics like makeup, hairstyling products, cologne or perfume. Later, you have a great night out drinking and partying. and the next day you have a splitting headache so you take an advil and drink water. Do you realize that all we consume are available at the sacrifice of animals? Do you know as of right now, rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, monkeys, and more are being experimented on in the name of science and human advancement? Animal experimentation has been prevalent since Greek times when Aristotle and Erasistratus performed experiments on living animals. Animal dissections have become popular amongst high schools and universities, especially in medical fields. Animal testing are used for biomedical research as well as tests for toxicology, drug, and food in order to be proven harmless for humans. Even though experimentation is for researching and safety testing purposes, more than 100 million animals suffer and die in the US every year at the hands of researchers and scientists. Animal experimentation for medical advancements are not beneficial for animals because experiments are harmful to animals, there are modern and reliable methods of testing, and the majority of the research do not improve human health.