Is Animal Testing Necessary For Research

Did you know that during the "Space Race", both the Soviets and Americans sent animals into space for testing? The issue of whether or not animal testing should be allowed for astronomic purposes has been around for a long time. Some believe animal testing is cruel and evil. While others say "it's completely necessary". I believe even while being "unfair to the animals", animal testing is necessary.

Animals that were used in during this experiment was necessary to save human lives. If they wouldn't have animals tested during the space race, how would they have known that it would be safe? Think about it, would the Space Race have happened if they never animal tested? Russia was first known to send a dog named Laika to space, but America has also done animal testing. According to Amplify, they stated that "A week later a bear named Oscar was knocked out with anesthetics, strapped into the chair of a high-speed sled, and sent on a ride that subjected him to twenty times the force of gravity. 'We wanted to prove that a person could withstand rapid deceleration with no ill effects,' said a military spokesman. A thorough examination being necessary to prove the absence of ill effects, Oscar was killed and then autopsied." In that piece of evidence, they stated that Oscar, the bear, was killed. Yes, that's tragic, but it is better an animal rather than a human life being sacrificed. Just think, would you rather risk your parents or your pet? It is a hard decision but animals are easier to let go than another human being. There is

The scientists did not know what would happen to living organism to leave earth's atmosphere. So they worked with animals in tests. Some of the questions the scientists had were “What would be the effects of weightlessness on a mammal? How would the body handle radiation from the sun?” In s of putting people in a dangerous

Do you think animal testing is wrong why and why not? I think it is good because we'd all rather an animal die than have a human being that has a family. I also think it is necessary because most animals share human DNA with us so it's easier to test products and other things on them. According to History.com Laika, the dog was launched into outer space on November 3rd, 1957. This shows that we used an actual animal first instead of a human. +7

Animal testing is not only beneficial to human but also animals, at least to those who are not used in the experiments, such as pets and endangered species. Along with researching for new treatments and medicines for

Animal Testing was necessary during the space race. This is because at the time of the space race nobody knew if humans could survive in space. This meant sending animals was the best option. As well as the only option. This can be located at https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/9-12/features/F_Animals_in_Space_9-12.html were it states "in the earlier days of space exploration, nobody knew if people could survive a trip away from Earth, so using animals was the best way to find out".

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

To begin with, why is it done? Animal testing is done to protect humans from bad products that may hurt them, also to find ways to cure diseases that haven’t been cure yet. 95 percent of mice and rats are used for research. Mice represented the largest increase in research with their numbers going from 1.2 million to nearly 1.9 million in that period. Other animals also saw increases (Qtd animal experiment up to 73 percent, study says). Other animals that are used in research are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, fish, and insects, and also less than one percent cats, and dog’s area also used for research. Another reason is to treat injuries and learn more about the animal bodies to find the similarity to the human body (qtd. animal research). Animal testing is inhumane when testing to protect humans. Some people say testing on animals are life changing experiments and with the help of animal experiment can discover blood transfusion, kidney dialysis, and gene therapy for example cystic fibrosis and types of cancer( Coster 7). Others think experimenting on animal is cruel and they suffer a lot. It is true

On the opposing argument, some may say that testing animal is cruel and that most experiments go wrong and the lives of many animals are lost. With that being said some animals do lose their lives when certain tests do end badly although animal testing has benefited and even saved many animal’s lives by creating cures and treatments. Many animals would have died from rabies, distemper, infectious hepatitis virus, and feline leukemia if it weren’t for animal testing.

To start, animal testing during the space race was tremendously necessary because this would help scientists begin to answer the question of 'What happens to a human body in space?'; animal testing could also help Scientists learn how microgravity affects balance, sensory integration, sleep, control of blood pressure and the development of the nervous system, and finally, it could also help prove the safety and viability of launching a living being into space and return it unharmed.

I think we shouldn't test on animals. Animals are born to grow up and live a happy, healthy life not get tested on for mascara and lipstick. Animals die and get sick everyday due to animal testing. Some animals go blind, deaf, lose their legs or ears, make their young have birth defects, or worse they could die. They whine and get hurt, the scientists just continue their work, it is like they have no heart for these animals.

There is no denying that animal testing has led to many medical discoveries which have saved many lives. The first pancreases taken from dogs directly led to the discovery of insulin, which has saved many diabetics’ lives. This discovery is the back-bone to allowing animal testing to continue because it is proof that animal testing can lead to lives being saved. Animal testing is a controversy that has lasted for over 30 years, and it will continue to be the center of many debates until an equivalent form of testing is discovered that no longer puts animals in the line of fire. But until that day arrives, the question still stands. Should animals be used as test subjects? Though there are two answers to this question, each making logical points, I say that animals should no longer be used.

Should animal testing still be necessary? This is a very hard decision, there are pros and cons on both sides of the argument, but i'm going with no. Animal testing should not be necessary and it isn't. hurting animals should be the same as hurting humans. I hope the people who disagree change your mind.

For centuries mankind has experimented on animals for a number of different reasons. Early experimentation with animals was originally born out of curiosity but eventually became a necessity to find medicines to cure viruses and a myriad of illnesses. If not for the existence of animals, humans would be left to experiment on themselves at a high rate which would create a worldwide moral dilemma. Such a dilemma could be dictated based on the question of who should be chosen for experimentation; should it be a particular race or class of people?

Animals are being tested constantly in laboratories where they stay in cold cages that is now their new home. Humans believe that animal testing is beneficial because they develop medicines and vaccines that are essentials to human needs. Testing on animals is not necessary because it causes suffering, it is unethical, and it has been unsuccessful for human medication.