Is Cancer A Bottle?

Can you imagine a relative having to hear that they have skin cancer? Some patients have no knowledge of why or how they have contracted it. Why would a healthy human be diagnosed with cancer? Beauty products can cause horrible reactions when toxins are used. Cosmetic products are one of the causes of our skin cancer epidemic. People should know how to protect themselves, the stages of skin cancer, and how to detect skin cancer.

Throughout the decades, women’s fashion has evolved many times, each time creating a fashion stamp unique to that particular decade. One thing has remained the same and managed to remain a part of every era: hairspray. It is a cosmetic product that is meant to hold hair in its place. A lot of products we use today are may have unseen consequences to daily usage. A product I use almost daily is hairspray. I always knew hairspray was bad for the environment because of the aerosol that was in them would break down the ozone layer, so I began to look at a specific hairspray that I use just about every morning and night, Sebastian Shaper Hairspray, Regular, Styling Mist for Hold & Control. This specific Sebastian Hairspray product is not only

Before buying any beauty products, you should be aware of any harmful chemicals in them

Chemicals have harmed everyone over the years. During 2007-2010 there was a huge epidemic of toys that were created with very toxic chemicals. Sometimes we don’t realized or care enough about the amount of damage we to the environment until it hurts the people we value the most for example family and friends. At the time many people didn’t think much of it, but as the media continued to tell stories of chemicals affecting little ones the outraged activists, parents and scientists began to search for a solution to prevent chemical poisoning in children’s toys.

Many People already know cigarettes are bad. There are ads everywhere listing how there are more than one thousand different chemicals found in cigarettes.

It is surprising the variety of chemicals that are added to household cleaners, what is even more shocking is that everyone else isn’t more concerned. Many household product have ingredient that are known to be cancer causing, yet these products are allowed to be sold to consumers. The more I research about this topic the more concerned I am about my household items. I have made some changes to what I buy at the store, I look for organics and environmentally conscious product to bring into my home but the expensive is quite noticeable. My grocery bill has double since I’ve started buying organic products, but if we do not contribute to changing the products, then companies have no incentive to make changes. It is exciting to hear

Human exposure to xenoestrogens, which imitate estrogen function in human bodies, would promote breast cancer cell development. According to Mitra et al., xenoestrogens are “chemicals in the form of polycarbonate plastics, food and cosmetic packaging, and even tin cans.” Presently banned DDT was once listed as a hypothetical carcinogen. As Dr. Mary Wolf says, “ women with higher concentration of DDT in their blood have a greater chance of getting breast cancer — up to a fourfold great chance” (Greene and Ratner). Regarding this, many scientists redid experiments comparing DDT concentrations in normal human breast tissue sample

Some food in our daily lives is very common, almost every day to eat. However, regular consumption of these foods, but the body will cause harm, even cause cancer. Then you know you have what daily life diet taboos it? Today small to tell you every day carcinogenic food black list, together vigilant about it!

In this generation of American society, there is a great emphasis on living a healthy lifestyle from factors such as diet and exercise. Yet today many of the products that Americans use and consume are full of cancer causing agents. In a society where there is a vast amount of research conducted and strict regulations, many daily used products are like a time bomb ready to explode. One-third of all people will develop cancer in our lifetime and one-fourth will die from this disease. Many cancers are due to preventable revelations to industrialized carcinogens and toxins in the food people eat, and household products and cosmetics people use daily.

Having laws banning the use of all dangerous chemicals in beauty products will be a step further into dodging many health dangers. On average, most women use approximately 12 beauty products with 168 different ingredients daily, some of which may be associated

Chemicals come in many shapes and sizes; in most instances some may appear to not pose such a big harm as others. However in 2016 manufactures “Procter & Gamble” became the center of controversy over the companies “Tide Pods” a three in one stain remover, brightener, and laundry detergent. How can detergent pods pose such a big concern to consumers such as parents of children and elderly? In Procter & Gamble’s April 2016 safety message you tube (http://www.youtube/tidesafety.com) the company made a not so persuasive commercial showing a toddler walking around the house while the mom is doing laundry and the toddler goes into the rest room where there are open pills on the counter top. The commercial gave the impression that just like medicine

The cosmetology industry has been infamously known for their lack of regulations on companies that produce beauty products. The companies do not operate through the FDA, so they are able to exclude important information from labels. In the past, manufacturers could omit ingredients from labels, claiming the right to protect trade secrets (Nguyen 2). More than 9,000 chemicals are found in cosmetic products; however, only half of them can be found on the labels (Pak 2). Because of the label loopholes, the chemicals in the products have also become unregulated. According to Nguyen at Organic Consumers Association, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not saftey test ingredients used in cosmetic or personal care products before they are sold to the public (2). This leads to toxic chemicals being circulated in the public market. Additionally, if there is not a way to

Through the depleting ozone layer and increasing levels of ultraviolet radiation within our atmosphere, skin cancer has risen as one of the major problems within contemporary society. Unfortunately, UV rays increase the risk of obtaining skin cancer since they permanently alter the DNA structure within our cells, creating a vast array of mutated cells. Research has shown that melanoma is considered the most serious type of skin cancer due to the development of dark spots on the skin, which develop in basal cells at the base of the epidermis caused by the exposure of ultraviolet rays. This problem with UV rays and its high level of skin cancer could be prevented if sunblock product companies enforced awareness of sun protection. Due to the lack of information among the public, these sunblock companies should emphasize that sunscreen absorbs ultraviolet rays and further damage the skin, whereas sunblock acts as a barrier between the skin and the UV rays. Thus, the chemicals used in sunblock should be noted since they provide efficient protection against UV rays. Without this explicit promotion of awareness, individuals will keep using sunscreen with SPF as a form of sunburn prevention without being aware that sunblock is the product that will actually provide protection against skin damage and skin cancer.

Another factor that PepsiCo feels may affect their business is additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on their product packaging (PepsiCo, 2016). New regulations may require companies to provide a label that highlights perceived concerns about a product or warns consumers to avoid consumption of certain ingredients present in their products on each product (PepsiCo, 2016). For example, in California, Proposition 65 requires a specific warning on any product that contains a substance listed by the State of California as having been found to cause cancer or birth defects if the levels of the substance are above a safe harbor level (PepsiCo, 2016). These new regulations could reduce the overall consumption of their products, lead to negative publicity or leave consumers with the perception that their products do not meet their health and wellness needs (PepsiCo, 2016). These regulations could ultimately negatively affect PepsiCo’s business, financial condition or results of operations (PepsiCo, 2016).

In 1984, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) evaluated the safety of methyl, propyl, and butylparabens, stating that they were “safe for use in cosmetic products at levels up to 25%,” which is a generous limit, considering the approximate level for parabens ranges from .01 to 3%. However, there are still claims that parabens do more harm than good. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported in December of 1999 “the chemical preservatives called parabens—methyl, propyl, butyl, and ethyl—displayed estrogenic activity in several tests.” Essentially, they found that parabens have the capability to mimic the body’s own hormones, which can lead to disruptions in the endocrine system, developmental and reproductive toxicity, allergies, and immunotoxicity. Even though parabens occur naturally in low levels in foods, like strawberries, blueberries, onions, carrots, etc, they are metabolized when consumed, making them less estrogenic. Yet, when the