Is Chemical Castration a Good Thing? Essay

Chemical castration is a reversible treatment for those with urges to commit sex crimes, as well as those who have had a history of convicted sex crimes. This drug treatment helps to lower sex drives and decrease aggressive and violent tendencies. There are side effects to this drug just as there are for every other medicine on the market. Although it was not created for men, they suffer no extra side effects than the women. Chemical castration is an exceptional alternative to prison time or it works as a stepping block for integration back into society. It is a more cost effective alternative as well as being more efficient in correcting the problem as opposed to locking it up. With strict guidelines and continual use it can be the most effective course of action for sexual offenders today.

There have been many federal acts passed in correspondence with sex offenses that illicit feat with the public. There are many different types of ways in which Levenson & colleagues’ (2007) describes the perceptions that the public has based on certain factors. For instance, in relation to the perception about the sex offender notification system, a survey produced results of around 80 percent in favor of these registries, because these individuals felt safer in their communities knowing who was in their neighborhood. Further, due to this fear that resonated in the early 1990’s communities do have tools such as residential restrictions, civil commitment, notification procedures, etc. that aid in the protection. However, there are myths associated with sex offenders, for example legislation often states that the reasoning for new laws and regulations is due to the high recidivism rates. However, sex offenders have significantly lower recidivism rates than believed. Also, there are countless people who do not believe that sex offenders can be assisted with techniques from a psychological standpoint. Most people think that these offenders cannot be treated, however, there is research being conducted that is promising. Finally, there is a common misconception that sex offenders kill their victims, especially children more often than other killers, however this is not true.

Is it ethical then to punish people who commit sexual abuse against children? Or should our approach be treatment not punishment? This is an age old debate, while there have been attempts to treat the 'disease' of pedophilia, there are exceptions to this treatment whom despite it do reoffend. Counseling, monitoring, medicating, and even chemical castration are some ways our society has developed to "treat" the biological and psychological side of the argument

Sex offenders have been a serious problem for our legal system at all levels, not to mention those who have been their victims. There are 43,000 inmates in prison for sexual offenses while each year in this country over 510,000 children are sexually assaulted(Oakes 99). The latter statistic, in its context, does not convey the severity of the situation. Each year 510,000 children have their childhood's destroyed, possibly on more than one occasion, and are faced with dealing with the assault for the rest of their lives. Sadly, many of those assaults are perpetrated by people who have already been through the correctional system only to victimize again. Sex offenders, as a class of criminals, are nine times more likely to repeat their

Where they will have hard time over coming it, and moving on. In order to stop these types of activities and the public becoming more victims of this crime, the criminal justice system have created new laws and regulation for future preventions. For example there is website for sexual offender, that website holds records of all registered sexual offender where they live. From example there, the public can see where they live and if they feel conformable living there. If someones been a victim, I doubt they wanna live near any of them, because of the fear of being victimized. That fear can impact victim, some children who were victimized are not able to share till they are older. The criminal justice system tried to prevent this act from occurring, by arresting, convicting, and punishing them. Some perpetrator are mentally not okay, which leads them this act. This is where rehabilitation programs are available to help the offender. As mentions in the article, “Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders”, by Tony Ward has “reduced sexual recidivism rates from 17.4% to 9.9%” This happened because offenders received helped that actually help them like, like getting behavioral

A considerable question could be whether an offender can be deregistered. Without a doubt, there are a few sex offenders who have been convicted of this crime who do not pose any threat to the community. These people suffer from consequences such as being unable to have employment, return to school, or even social interactions. In cases like these, they often look for an alternative option. For many years, deregistration was not probable for anyone until now. Looking into the research of deregistration, an attorney from Austin, Texas by the name of Scott Smith, has provided certain step for an eligibility of deregistration. The first step is to determine the eligibility of the offender. To be eligible, they must not have more than one violation

However, this penis is not in the way it was before. He believes it has been succeeded by something else and the successor is enjoying the same benefits meant for the penis. But this interest increases tremendously caused by the horror of castration. Additionally, any aversion from the real female genitals will cause a lot stigma to the minds of the fetishist. This said, Freud points out that it is now easier to note what is achievable through a fetish and what exactly maintains it. The fetishist will conquer any threat that comes with castration and will have all sorts of protection. Also, it will save the fetishist from developing homosexual behavior because he will brand women as nothing else but sexual objects. After some time, the fetishist will start developing and enjoying that feeling of having a substitute for a genital. No other person will understand the meaning of that particular fetish. Therefore, he will be the only person who will understand its meaning and its benefits as far as sexual satisfaction attached to it is concerned. What other men have to work hard for in order to satisfy their sexual feelings can be accessed by a fetishist without much

The purpose of this literature review is to discuss the importance of sexual offender treatment, to compare and contrast research points regarding treatment, and to address the validity of the peer reviewed articles. Every year 6,000 sex offenders enter treatment (Waldram, 2008). Various therapeutic treatment options are offered, and the primary focus is to rehabilitate and change behavior. The body of research reveals different therapeutic treatment models and discusses the purpose and effectiveness of each model. This paper will also discuss some of the challenges of implementing therapeutic treatment schemas as viable alternatives to treat sex offenders. Lastly, the research will also examine the impact of treatment as it relates to

Sexual assault is one of the fastest growing violent crimes in America. Approximately 20% of all people charged with a sexual offense are juveniles. Among adult sex offenders, almost 50% report that their first offense occurred during their adolescence. (FBI, 1993) There are many different opinions, treatment options and legislation to manage the growing numbers of juvenile sex offenders. In today’s society the psychological and behavioral modification treatments used to manage juvenile sex offenders is also a growing concern. To understand and determine the proposed treatment methods, several related issues will need to be reviewed such as traditional sex offender therapy methods like cognitive therapy and alternative therapies like

When working with this specific population mental health professionals are often called on to evaluate and manage sex offender’s behavior. There are also times when individuals may be asked to give an opinion as to if the offender will repeat the behavior. Often times people that work with this population are referred to as (SOSs) Sex Offender Specialists. They have a specific group of diverse training and background. Some of these trainings incIude but are not limited to cognitive-behavioral, psychopharmacological, and therapeutic orientations.

The treatment for sexual offenders is done in a three principal approach which is cognitive behavioral approach, psycho-educational approach, and pharmacological approach. The cognitive behavioral approach gives emphasis on altering the habits of the offended relating toward sexual offending and “deviant patterns of arousal”. (CSOM) This means altering the daily habits of the offender which may be everything they had known previously to incarceration. The second principal of psycho-educational focuses on altering the offender’s state of mind toward their victims and attempts to instill the understanding of how they inflicted harm with their actions. With psychology there is never a set time on how long a set goal will be reached. Times vary between individuals and can sometime never reach their desired outcome. In conjunction with those previous principals the offenders are also treated under the pharmacological

     Cohen, Seghorn, and Calmas (1969) described three types of child molesters derived from their clinical studies. One type had a history of relatively normal functioning and the incident of molestation appears to reflect a reaction to a severe threat to their sense of sexual adequacy. Another type had a history of poor social-sexual functioning and is regarded as primitive and immature in terms of social-sexual skills. The last type they found in their study had offenses involving cruel and vicious assaults on children and the act of molestation is regarded as more aggressive then sexual. (Mc Creary, 1975)

In 2005, Lösel & Schmucker conducted a meta-analysis of sexual offender treatment. Featuring 69 studies containing 80 independent comparisons between treated and untreated offenders. treated offenders showed 37% less sexual recidivism compared to the control groups. Organic treatments such as

Personally, my argument for this question is aimed more at repeated sex offenders. With one-time sex offenders, I would need to see the reasoning behind the logic. For example, some people on the sex offender list are on there because they had sex with their girlfriend while she was under-age. The girl may have consented, but because she was under-age, her boyfriend would be accused of having sex with a minor and then placed on the sex offender list. In cases like that, I don’t believe the male should be castrated. However, males who are known as repeated sex offenders should most definitely be castrated in my opinion. Obviously, if they are known to have raped, assaulted, or harassed others more times than one, they obviously need to be taught a lesson.

In the United States, required surgical or chemical castration is something that is not really considered as a form of punishment or a method of rehabilitation for sexual offenders. The reason for this