Is Chromium Or Wrong?

As a nation, we agree that individuals should be accountable for their actions. People often argue that those who are reckless with their bodies by ingesting chemicals via cigarettes or drug use and who subsequently develop cancers shouldn’t be

With the well-being of future generations in mind, environmental concerns have begun to establish a permanent residence atop the priority ladder for a vast array of Americans. Consequently, writers and political pundits alike are seizing this opportunity to capitalize on advocating their stance on the issue. Information, representing all positions, pours in at an unrelenting and unfathomable rate. For the average American it can be an arduous process sifting through all the rhetoric in attempt to find the real truth regarding our impact as humans on the environment; one such example is Susan Brown’s article The EPA’s Mercury Problem. In this article Brown attempts to expose hypocrisy among progressives by paralleling the Environmental Protection

Luckily, a lot of scientists nowadays realize that animal testing is inhumane and not necessary. Until today, thousands to millions of dollars are being wasted by funding to many studies that are not related to people’s lives, or studies that already proved dangerous to humans. For example, people learned that mercury, arsenic, and lead are toxic to humans, especially small children; however, the EPA still provided more than $400,000 for scientists to study on how these contaminants affect animals, by forcing pregnant rats and piglets to

In 1961 to 1972 the United States was using more than 19 million gallons of herbicides in Vietnam. This herbicide was used to help clear out the forest lands so that the U.S soldiers could see where they were going, but did the scientist look at the long term effects? This herbicide, Agent orange cause many side effects, including 5 illnesses, different types of cancers and many more different health problems in people living in that time period and many generations to come. There is a major issue on whether scientist should be held morally responsible for the outcomes of their experiments. There are many arguments on whether scientist should be held morally responsible for the outcomes of their experiments because it is their responsibility

Pezzullo investigates in this article the strategies of environmental justice advocates in Warren County, North Carolina. The rhetorical efforts shown by these advocates vigorously urged the state of North Carolina to clean up a local toxic landfill caused by a truck illegally dumping oil contaminated with PCBs in the middle of the night.

McCarthy enhances her argument by providing an abundance of evidence throughout the article. For example, in paragraph 5 she states that the "EPA scientists are learning more each day about how air quality impacts human health", and then offers research done by the EPA stating "air pollution can affect cardiovascular health". McCarthy uses evidence to appeal to the public, as seen in paragraph 5 when she says, "We also use our science to keep the nation's water clean". She then backs up that claim with evidence stating that the EPA developed "early warning systems"

The Environmental Protection Agency was created in 1970 to help provide solutions to the environmental issues and problems that need to be addressed. The name of the agency tells us that they are here to protect the environment and hold those who would harm our earth responsible for their actions. Unfortunately, the very agency that has been tasked with our protection has now become the perpetrator of an environmental disaster in Colorado. Last week, the EPA accidently dumped over three million gallons of toxic waste into Animus River (Kinkaid, 2015). It would appear that the good guys in white hats have turned their hats in for a new color that bad guys are associated with in the movies (black hats). The Fox news article by Kinkaid is an opinion

The United States failed to perform toxicology examinations in order to determine what environmental hazards would occur by using Agent Orange. As a result, millions have suffered from teratogens, which cause birth defects, mutagens, which damaged genetic material among many Vietnamese, and carcinogens, which caused cell damage and cancer among both American veterans and Vietnamese. Regardless of the issue that the United States military failed to conduct previous examination of Agent Orange, the moral issue is that United States failed to perform environmental justice, which states that there must be equal treatment of all people involved in hazardous chemicals regardless of origin, race, or gender. Another principle the United States failed to address is the precautionary principle, which states that when a chemical hazard is possible all precautions must take action in order to reduce risks. Environmental justice and the precautionary principle both address a strong moral compass, and what it means to possess moral curtesy. Equal treatment of Vietnamese and US veterans has still not been

It is important that achieving environmental justice becomes an aim that is universal. This is because minorities and those with a lower socioeconomic status bear the burden of environmental hazards. Environmental hazards can impact the quality of the air, water, and land. Exposure to these environmental hazards can occur through inhalation, ingestion, and absorption. Thus adverse health outcomes may result. Because minorities and those of a lower socioeconomic status typically bear the burden of environmental hazards, they are at an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. This is especially harmful to vulnerable populations including children and the elderly. This is seen in the environmental justice case, Maynas Carijana vs.

The town of Woburn, MA was stricken with an epidemic of different types of leukemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, which affected 8 families. The mere notion that such rare cases occurred within a half mile radius of each other was a call for attention. It is the plaintiff 's claim that these cases were the result of a toxic contamination of the town’s water supply by the defendant 's unintentional, improper disposal of the following chemical waste products: Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Perchlorethylene (PCE). The plaintiff accuses the defendant of the following charges: negligence of chemical procedures including, but not limited to, illegal dumping of TCE, as well as PCE, and wrongful death, resulting from a depraved indifference to human life. Given the pain and suffering the victims and their families have undergone due to the defendant’s gross negligence, the plaintiff asks for compensation for and acknowledgement of wrongdoing on the defendant 's part. The plaintiff also calls for an injunction; in order for the defendant to resume further factory work, the company must propose, and be approved of, new procedures that strictly follow the enforced regulations that ensure the safe disposal of all chemical waste.

Risk regulation and Superfund decision-making play an important role since they affect the potential exposure of residents to the contaminant. Superfund risk assessments determine how threatening a hazardous waste site is to human health and environment. Risk Assessors seek to determine a safe level for each potentially dangerous contaminant present. But there’s a potential biases in response to risk perception in regulators decisions. If decision makers at Superfund sites targeted for cleanups were concerned solely with social welfare maximization, then these regulators would choose target risks for cleanups based on factors

1. I do not believe that the EPA could be justified on moral grounds because lives should not be valued at different dollar amounts. A life is a life, no matter how close to death a person is.

We have all seen Proposition 65 warning labels in some products or areas. When we saw these labels, it made us think that the product or an area with it may cause cancer. It made us have a hard time making a decision on whether we buy a product or go to an area because it is a need product and there a risk of us get cancer when we used it. In fact, Proposition 65 requires businesses to place warning labels when there is a cancer-causing substance in their products which said, “This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, and other reproductive harm.” The purpose of Proposition 65 is to have Californians to make a healthier decision and protects them from exposing to cancer-causing

The River Valley investigation has been the largest environmental investigation in Ohio's history (Henry, 2009). The investigation was soundly thought through and exhibited limited bias. The researchers were dealing with many young children and their health, which is why I believe aided their responsiveness as they wanted to get to the root of the problem quickly. It is unfortunate though that decades of children were exposed. Once the state became involved and community members put forth courageous efforts to research the cause on their own, the students were quickly removed to a different location.

The deaths of people are increasing , there are about 49,700 people that are in a risk of colon cancer These chemicals help , ill and make people suffer due to those chemicals in processed foods .These chemicals help and hurt the human population, the help us by giving us read to eat foods , although the hurt the human population by causing colon cancer. The two groups known as the (EPA ) and the (WHO) who are still discovering more about the colon cancer problems in the