Is Circumcision A Surgical Procedure?

Male circumcision has long been a debate with decisions based on cultural, ethnic, religious and social preference of the parent. There are both benefits and risks associated with the procedure of male circumcision. The procedure involves the removal of some or, the entire foreskin around the penis. Neonatal circumcision is rising among English speaking countries and it is known now that more than 80% of the male population has been circumcised. (CDC, 2006) This number is rising however; studies show that there is insufficient evidence to recommend neonatal circumcision as a routine decision. (AAP, 2006). Many debates of this procedure relate to the benefits versus the risk and medical costs that the procedure entails. This paper

Islamic, Jewish, West African, the Aborigines of Australia and many other religions and cultures use circumcision as a rite of passage that holds significant meaning. Most preform the act in infancy or early childhood and while some hold it as optional others see it as obligatory and will even make sure to circumcise their deceased before burial. (Darby) In Kenya, boys will wear the razor blade that was used on them around their necks as a sign of “initiation into manhood” (Morris) Some religions, such as Catholicism, have maintained that the act of circumcision is brutal, barbaric and unnecessary.(Wikipedia 1)

The first reason why the cultural practice of female circumcision requires the scrutiny of the West and should be abolished altogether is because genital excision is injurious to women’s health. Because of the conditions where female circumcision is usually performed in Africa, excision can cause infection and shock. There are an abundant amount of

Table 4 summarizes the CRIES score associated with and duration of each circumcision technique. Both groups were observed to have the same CRIES score. However, Mogen clamp was found to be significantly faster than Gomco.

Before today, I had not put a lot of thought into the issue of male circumcision; I did already know that male circumcision was important to some religions because I myself was religious and have seen it mentioned in the Bible. However, I assumed that most male infants in the United States were circumcised for one reason or another; I also did not know males would get circumcised after infancy too, like in the video. Today, through reading the article about the position of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) fact sheet, I would agree that male circumcision is beneficial for infant males.

The practice of female circumcision is happening in areas across the globe such as Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The United states and Serval others counties look at this as a vicious act of genital mutilation and an outright human rights violation (Clay, 2017, p.g.22). The practice of female circumcision has gone on for years as a cultural rite of passage in some countries. Other countries see it as a religious belief and others see it as a way to make their daughter more desirable for a husband The author reports that even through in the United States that many women more than half a million are still at risk of having their genital cut from the CDC reports in 2012 (Clay, 2017,

Some may say, how can you be okay with male circumcision, but not female circumcision, every should be treated the same and you should not be so biases when it comes to circumcision. For one, they are done for two completely diffent reasons. Female circumcision as a ritual that is said tp change a girl into a women, it is done to make a girl remain a virgin until marriage and make the girl suitable for marriage. Those do not seem like justifiable reasons to cause damage to a child’s body.

“Circumcision is an elective surgical procedure to remove all or part of the foreskin (prepuce) from the penis" (Jarvis, pg. 693, 2012). This nontherapeutic surgical procedure has small risk for complications such as pain, bleeding, swelling, or inadequate skin removal. Serious complications are rare and include excess bleeding, wound infection, and urinary retention (Jarvis, pg. 693, 2012). “The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) states that current evidence…..shows that health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks. Male circumcision reduces the risk for men of acquiring genital herpes, genital ulcers, and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Female partners of circumcised men have a reduced risk of acquiring HPV, bacterial

Many people believe that circumcising a baby boy is more hygenic than leaving the foreskin intact, but this was not always the main concern. There was a time when receiving this procedure may have been considered a status symbol. An increase in hospital births and a perception of circumcision as promoting cleanliness certainly contributed to the rise

Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin of the penis. This practice of male circumcision was started century ago by Jewish people as part of religious ritual (Pillitteri, 2014). Today there is controversy with this practice. For this week's discussion, we are going to concentrate on proponents of the practice. Male circumcision has been a practice in various social groups in many countries around the world including Jewish people, Muslim, and even citizens of the United Stated of America (Chiringa, Ramathuba, & Mashau, 2017). Culture and religion have had a great impact on decision making regarding male circumcision.

Circumcision surgery is a common procedure that removes the foreskin from a penis so that the head is exposed. Moreover, there are numerous potential medical benefits of circumcision in terms of a slightly lower risk of UTIs, Urinary Tract Infections, easier genital hygiene, prevention of foreskin infections among many others. However, with a plethora of circumcision clinics in Manchester flooding the market, choosing the right one can be a daunting task. Not to worry, Baby Circumcision Manchester offers a professional, quality medical service to families who wish their sons to be circumcised.

It is believed that circumcision brings a lot of health benefit to human especially in health. Based on the research by the doctors and scientist, it is proven that this practice would help to reduce the risk of infection. This practice could also help to reduce the chance of contract disease especially that is connected to the reproductive organ.

Circumcision is something that we consider very normal in our American culture. Although we may consider ourselves familiar with the concept of this practice, there's still a lot we don't know about it, and quite a bit of misinformation on the topic. You would be surprised at how wrong some of the information you assume to be true actually is. Here are some of the most common misconceptions about it.

Female genital mutilation is a very disturbing act that we must eliminate; even if will have to pull this bull by its horns. According to Sarah Boseley, health editor at World Health Organization explains, female genital mutilation is a procedure that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Sadly, this act is recognized as a violation of the human rights of girls and women. In addition, as per World Health Organization, this practice is mostly carried out by traditional circumcisers, who often play other central roles in communities, such as attending childbirths (Mutilation). However, this is a traditional practice which has been practiced by several

This number increased to 89% after the informational session on benefits of male circumcision in prevention of HIV and other infections. The survey was conducted at nine locations across Botswana representing twenty nine ethnicities thereby making the results geographically and ethnically generalizable across the nation. There were no significant differences in results for sex, ethnicity, religion, occupation or education and most of them cited health reasons for acceptance.3 The strength of the study was reduction of potential bias as only three trained health educators performed all the interviews but potential bias from the low response rate could as arisen as only 605 interviews were conducted which is a relatively small sample size. As stated in RCT from Kenya studies, the study warrants for more MC if safe circumcision services are provided. Extensive training, proper instrumentation, clear postoperative instructions, and continuing quality assurance and control are helpful to assure optimum outcomes.2 MC is an effective, available, permanent and affordable means to reduce the incidence of HIV in the next generation. Although, infant circumcision would take approximately 15 years to have an effect on the HIV epidemic.3 A similar survey in Dominican Republic among uncircumcised men found that overall acceptability was 29%. The number increased to 67% after an information session