Everyday scientists come up with new ideas that can change how humans live. But not all the things scientist came up with are morally right. Usually new ways to do things cause a lot of controversy and debate. Cloning is a great example of a scientific subject that causes debate weather it is morally right or not. Cloning started with the cloning of carrot plants in 1957. Plants are the easiest things to clone because they technically do it naturally through asexual reproduction (Petechuk). "A clone is a cell that is identical to the cell it was derived from" (Petechuk). With that said, there are three kinds of cloning: gene cloning, twinning, and nuclear transfer. In 1964 the first animal cells were cloned. 20 years later we finally figured out how to clone mammals, and it all started with mice. This started the era of cloning animals (Petechuk). …show more content…
Dolly was cloned "using cells from the mammary glands of an adult sheep and an egg cell from which the nucleus had been removed" (Petechuk). Dolly took 277 tries to get her right. Many people question if Dolly could be called a real living animal. I think she proved many people wrong when she gave birth to healthy babies (Aldridge). Even though Dolly was a huge success and a big step forward in cloning science, she did die young. Her chromosomes were shorter than the average sheep. Cloning in animals can also cause diseases (Petechuk). After Dolly, cloning has done some miracles like bringing back an extinct species called the Ibex. The Ibex was a mountain goat from Spain. Scientists saved skin from the goat and cloned it. It died shortly after birth (LaPensee). So animal cloning as you can see has not been perfected but still is improving every
If a person is in a situation in which they may have lost a loved one and are trying to replace them, therefore it is morally wrong for him or her to use reproductive cloning.
Cloning since Dolly has grown, and it has led to new discoveries as well. “[In 1998] more than 50 mice cloned from adult mice in Hawaii [proved] that Dolly was not a fluke. [The] method used works so well that scientists have even made clones of the clones” (Newman 12). This was just two years after Dolly was cloned, and since then there had been even more
Cloning and selective breeding have been used to get the desired genetic makeup of animals. Cloning is the process of producing genetically identical copies of organisms that have identical DNA. The copied material is referred to as a clone. Clones can happen naturally such as identical twins Or they can be produce in a lab. A wide range of biological material have been successfully cloned such as cell tissues and even whole organism such as a sheep. In 1996, Dolly the cloned sheep was successfully cloned by Ian Wilmut and his colleagues in Edinburgh Scotland. There is two ways cloning can be done by the somatic nuclear transfer or artificial embryo twinning.
The act of cloning a human being comes dangerously close to human beings acting as God. Do human beings have the right to tamper with nature in this way? This essay explores the various ethical issues related to the cloning debate, and seeks answers to this deep philosophical question at the heart of bioethics. As a student of genetic biology and future biologist, this question also has personal relevance. Our science is evolving at a rapid pace. As human cloning becomes increasingly possible, it is important that we analyze the ethics of cloning so that judicious public policy can be created. It is therefore my position that research into cloning should continue to fulfill the fundamental goals of scientific exploration and to explore the possibilities that cloning might have in terms of benefitting human society; on the other hand, there are certainly ethical limits to the practice of cloning. It is important to define those ethical limits, so that scientists understand the best ways to proceed.
There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.
The first Mammal to be cloned was Dolly the sheep. That’s when cloning really started to take off. Dolly lived from 5 July 1996 to 14 February 2003. Since the cloning of Dolly just over 20 years ago, 22 other species of animals have been cloned since. ("Cloning Dolly The Sheep") (“How many
Animal cloning is getting popular by scientists day by day after the success of the sheep Dolly which was the first animal clone in the world. Dolly was created effectively by Roslin Instute scientist in Edinburgh (TechNyou) and she was euthanized when she was six year old due to a virus-induced lung tumour (Mott M., 2004). Even though the relevant scientists report that there is no evidence that cloning might be the cause of the disease of Dolly (Mott M., 2004), most of the scientists agree that cloning animals cannot be
Recently the ability to clone a human being has become a very realistic possibility. However, the issue of morality has taken center stage on this topic. A Gallup poll taken in 1997 revealed eighty-eight percent of Americans stated, "cloning human beings would be morally wrong" (Dudley
Cloning is defined as the “creation of an exact copy of a living matter, such as a cell or organism” according to Encarta encyclopedia. The copies produced through cloning have identical genetic makeup and are known as clones. Scientists use cloning techniques in the laboratory to create copies of cells or organisms with valuable traits.
If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right
I believe that cloning would be a major moral controversy 50 years from now just, because if that kind of technology gets into the wrong hand it could be dangerous. Yes, it could be beneficial in some way, but I think the consequence that could result from it would over power the purpose. For example, if cloning technology gets into the hands of one of our enemies they would then have the ability to create an army of cloned
When Dolly, the first cloned sheep entered in the news, the cloning controversy is becoming more prominent. Not only researchers, the general public became interested in knowing how cloning is done as well as engage in the pros and cons.
On July 5, 1995 Dolly the sheep was the first successfully cloned mammal born from an adult cell, the cells that made the embryo that turned into Dolly were taken from two separate sheep a nucleus from a black face sheep and the other cell the nucleus was taken out was from a white face sheep .The united states animal cloning program has been in controversy for the past couple decades, bringing some concerns about multiple assets of this program. Animal cloning has been around since 1938 when Hans Spemann suggested that they conduct a “fantastic experiment” of taking the nucleus of an egg cell and replacing it with another nucleus to create an embryo. This kick-started a multi million dollar program which successfully cloned multiple animals from frogs to fruit flies, and pigs to primates. Some positive things animal cloning can do for mankind are: to de-extinct animals, quickly reproduce livestock for food sources, and they are used to find genetic testing and drug/disease research.
The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.
While many see cloning as an opportunity for scientific and social advancement, those possibilities are outweighed by the many corresponding ethical dilemmas. Our modern world is overwhelmed with technology that theoretically enriches or lives or enhances its quality. Personal computers, smartphones and email come to mind. Other inventions and scientific developments, such as nuclear weapons, make us more uncomfortable due to their capability for mass destruction when placed in the wrong hands. Typically, it is easy to discern and draw that invisible line between science that is mostly beneficial to us and alleged progress that could have an overall damaging impact on the fabric of our society. When scientists in Scotland successfully cloned a mammal in 1996 – a sheep they named Dolly, in honor of American country singer Dolly Parton (Smith) – it triggered an ethical debate that lingers to this day and promises to grow more spirited in these socially permissive times.