Is Cloning Morally Right Or Wrong

There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.

Animal cloning started without the world even knowing. First, an animal clone is “an exact physical copy of one ‘parent’” (Newman 12). “Animal cloning experiments began in the 1960’s. Frogs were the first subjects. By 1987 scientists had begun cloning cows and other mammals” (Newman 12). Dolly the sheep was the first big cloning success, credited to Ian Wilmut in 1996 (Praded 21). This sheep was a scientific breakthrough, but it also caused many people to question the intents of scientists. Many people wondered if scientists would clone humans next. The original intent of animal cloning was not for the food industry. The reason animal cloning started was to find a way to help cure currently untreatable diseases (“Why Do Scientists Clone?”). By cloning cells, scientists will be able to manipulate the cells to become something new.

If a person is in a situation in which they may have lost a loved one and are trying to replace them, therefore it is morally wrong for him or her to use reproductive cloning.

Recently the ability to clone a human being has become a very realistic possibility. However, the issue of morality has taken center stage on this topic. A Gallup poll taken in 1997 revealed eighty-eight percent of Americans stated, "cloning human beings would be morally wrong" (Dudley

Cloning is a number of processes that are used to create genetically identical copies of an organism. Researchers have cloned a number of biological materials, such as genes, cells, tissues and whole organisms, including sheep 's and horses. Cloning can happen naturally in identical twins, but it can also be done in a lab. ("Cloning Fact Sheet").

The act of cloning a human being comes dangerously close to human beings acting as God. Do human beings have the right to tamper with nature in this way? This essay explores the various ethical issues related to the cloning debate, and seeks answers to this deep philosophical question at the heart of bioethics. As a student of genetic biology and future biologist, this question also has personal relevance. Our science is evolving at a rapid pace. As human cloning becomes increasingly possible, it is important that we analyze the ethics of cloning so that judicious public policy can be created. It is therefore my position that research into cloning should continue to fulfill the fundamental goals of scientific exploration and to explore the possibilities that cloning might have in terms of benefitting human society; on the other hand, there are certainly ethical limits to the practice of cloning. It is important to define those ethical limits, so that scientists understand the best ways to proceed.

As mentioned earlier, cloning is the copying of an organism that results in identical offspring (“Cloning”). Scientists have tried cloning many times on frogs and other organisms (“Cloning”), but when the first mammal to be cloned was successful in 1997, scientists jumped into pools of thoughts to clone humans. The first mammal to be cloned was a sheep named Dolly. The process of cloning Dolly was called Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. The nucleus of a somatic stem cell is taken out of the eggs of the

When Dolly, the first cloned sheep entered in the news, the cloning controversy is becoming more prominent. Not only researchers, the general public became interested in knowing how cloning is done as well as engage in the pros and cons.

I believe that cloning would be a major moral controversy 50 years from now just, because if that kind of technology gets into the wrong hand it could be dangerous. Yes, it could be beneficial in some way, but I think the consequence that could result from it would over power the purpose. For example, if cloning technology gets into the hands of one of our enemies they would then have the ability to create an army of cloned

Cloning is defined as the “creation of an exact copy of a living matter, such as a cell or organism” according to Encarta encyclopedia. The copies produced through cloning have identical genetic makeup and are known as clones. Scientists use cloning techniques in the laboratory to create copies of cells or organisms with valuable traits.

The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

Human cloning has been the main idea of many movies and books, from Star Wars where they had cloned armies from one man's DNA, to Jurassic Park with the cloning of new Dinosaurs. Though Jurassic Park’s science is too far fetched , because you cannot patch T-Rex DNA genomes with lizard, frog, or bird DNA -; that is simply an impossibility, but human cloning is not(Your source for all things Jurassic Park! N.D). In reality, however the first creature to ever be cloned successfully was a sheep named Dolly, who was created on July 5, 1996 in Scotland. Since her creation, there has been controversy regarding cloning from all around the world, and for different reasons, but most of the controversy came against the possibility of human cloning( Cloning Dolly the sheep. N.D). Human cloning is a novel idea but is logically not necessary for research, and it would create a large scale issue with human rights,and politics, with people wanting to use them for slavery.

While many see cloning as an opportunity for scientific and social advancement, those possibilities are outweighed by the many corresponding ethical dilemmas. Our modern world is overwhelmed with technology that theoretically enriches or lives or enhances its quality. Personal computers, smartphones and email come to mind. Other inventions and scientific developments, such as nuclear weapons, make us more uncomfortable due to their capability for mass destruction when placed in the wrong hands. Typically, it is easy to discern and draw that invisible line between science that is mostly beneficial to us and alleged progress that could have an overall damaging impact on the fabric of our society. When scientists in Scotland successfully cloned a mammal in 1996 – a sheep they named Dolly, in honor of American country singer Dolly Parton (Smith) – it triggered an ethical debate that lingers to this day and promises to grow more spirited in these socially permissive times.

On July 5, 1995 Dolly the sheep was the first successfully cloned mammal born from an adult cell, the cells that made the embryo that turned into Dolly were taken from two separate sheep a nucleus from a black face sheep and the other cell the nucleus was taken out was from a white face sheep .The united states animal cloning program has been in controversy for the past couple decades, bringing some concerns about multiple assets of this program. Animal cloning has been around since 1938 when Hans Spemann suggested that they conduct a “fantastic experiment” of taking the nucleus of an egg cell and replacing it with another nucleus to create an embryo. This kick-started a multi million dollar program which successfully cloned multiple animals from frogs to fruit flies, and pigs to primates. Some positive things animal cloning can do for mankind are: to de-extinct animals, quickly reproduce livestock for food sources, and they are used to find genetic testing and drug/disease research.