Is Consensus Decision-Making Right For Your Group?

A consultative style encourages discussion with the team; the leader presents the situation or problem and may possibly suggest a provisional decision. They then invite discussion about it and get suggestions and ideas, the leader then decides. Positives of this style include group synergy ‘none of use is as clever as all of us’, and acknowledgment that the team has something to contribute to the decision-making process. Disadvantages of this style could include slower decision making due to consultation, and the expectation of the team or individuals that they will always be consulted.

Group think is a phenomenon that occurs when group 's need for consensus supersedes the judgment of individual group members. Group think often occurs when there is a time constraint and individuals put aside personal doubts so a project can move forward or when one member of the group dominates the decision-making process.

Group members can achieve consensus in their decision making when they follow all of these steps except

There are many factors altering group behavior and effectiveness, such as decision- making, cohesion and communication (Crocker, 2016). The later has also shown a positive relationship with group task cohesion (Smith et al., 2013), and methods of enhancing intrateam

Shared decision-making involves an open and honest conversation between the clinician and the patient. It is a collaboration that takes into account treatment options and the patient’s values and preferences. It gives a patient a voice in their own care. Therefore, pure placebo-prescribing is ethical when the patient has a say – which can foster a placebo effect within the patient. Not from the pill “itself, but rather from the relationship between [the] healer and [the] patient, and the latter’s own capacity for self-healing” (Brody, 1982, 117). In other words, the context in which the pure placebo is prescribed can influence its positive results. Contrastingly, when patients are left out of the decision-making process, there is no room for the clinician’s and patient’s relationship to grow. It also raises the possibility of deception – a concept appearing in almost all of the medical literature on placebo-prescribing in clinical practice.

Team has to agree on the methods to which conflicts can be resolved within the group, this has to be addressed as soon as possible to enhance team cohesion and progress team effort towards achieving its goals.

Law enforcement, in general, has to adapt to the neverending changes that it faces from the criminal world. From cyber crimes to armed robberies, each crime committed have the common grounds of a crime, suspect, victim, and evidence. Technology has advanced in the law enforcement community and assists law enforcement greatly in ascertaining intelligence of criminals and give officers a possibility of locations, times, and possible crimes that will take place, and precision is included to some of the intelligence gained by the officer. Among crimes, suspects, and victims come the aftermath and repercussions of people that are entitled to their opinions, regardless of the evidence of the case that differs from location to location (Wood, 2014). Furthermore, the outcome can result in a positive or negative atmosphere in the area and create a domino effect to a larger scaled area

The discussion is an open-process, meaning that the decision making is done amongst the group members, not just the leader. Unlike an authoritative leader, the leader of this group allows the members to be a part of his or her final say. By doing this, it helps to keep everyone on the same page and moving forward in the same direction.

The article Titled “partners in care: patient empowerment through shared decision-making, Written by Debra J. Hain and Dianne Dandy explores the benefits of shared disciomne making and having a patient- provider partnership. Although the authors specifically mention a patient with chrinoch Kidiney diese and talks about how this helps nurses and their patients in the Nephrology specialty I believed that the subjects talked about in this article can be used by any nurse. Our patient MR.G has a diagnosis of powerlessness relating to the dependence on others and because of this we knew he needed to gain some control back. This is why we decided to aprroce him with the topic of going to a support group but we did not want to just

Also, we would have made all decisions by consensus in order to diminish dissent amongst the group. Although debate was encouraged among team members, some decisions were inputted by a majority rule due to time

There is power in any group consensus. As long as the group thinks as a group they gain authority and power over single voice. The group deflects the problems of the individual by diffusing responsibility thoughout its members. Diffusion of responsibility allows the group to think as an entity. Over time, the entity develops a set of mores. Mores within the group are very strong. The group takes on characteristics and functions as if it were possessed of individuals, but because its responsibility is to remain all knowing, all-powerful and obs equious. Claiming responsibility would in effect threaten the entity, so instead the entity threatens the individual

According to "Is Consensus Decision Making Right For Your Group?" The article states, "Everyone's ideas are included, which leads to a wider range of possible solutions." (Consensus). People will be able to find more solutions if everyone shares their opinion. Also, in "Consensus Will Be Used to Decide School Board Policy", the article states, "with consensus, a group can bring the best parts of many proposals together to create something new." (Stephens). With the more ideas that people say, there could be more opportunities, it can allow everyone to share their opinion. And that way people won't be mad about being left out in the conversation because they will say what they are thinking.

In nowadays, people have become more and more engage in political discussion. One of the topics that people mostly discuss about is that should the goal of politics is pursuit of an ideal, or find common ground and reach consensus? In my opinion, the goal of politics should find common ground and reach consensus. Though pursuing an ideal is attempting, it is often unrealistic. On the other hand, finding common ground and reaching consensus the way to reach a solution.

Within the study of human sociology, sociologists look through different lenses to view society. These lenses, or sociological paradigms, set a basis for the questions sociologists ask and provide different perspectives sociologists can take when attempting to explain humans and their societies. To display the diversity in which we may critique society, you can compare the two primary ways we approach sociology: social consensus and social conflict. To support my comparison I will outline information gathered in class and information from articles including Karl Marx’s “The Workings of Social Class” and Max Weber’s

When doing so the other group members were active listener, by using their whole body verbally and nonverbal. Like facing the speaker and giving eye contact and try to avoided interruption. The group also acknowledges the thoughts of the speaker by giving constructive feed back. Due to the effectiveness of the group communication, we were able to build trust, respect and understand the issues and make decision for effective change. We illustrate this by coming together as a group one again to accomplish the goal we initially wanted to accomplish. Since the first organization that we had chosen was incorrect, so we had to make the necessary changes to accomplish our goals. The other effective feature is the purpose of the group. Kozier et al (2010) stated that the effective group purpose is when “goal, task, and outcomes are clarified. Understanding and modified so that members of the group can commit themselves to purposes through cooperation” (p.401). For instance, each individual was assign a task and knew what was to be accomplished. As group we all decided to meet at suitable day and time which was beneficial to all team members, because we could commit to the group and focus on what needed to be achieved.