Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong?

Euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide, is an important and controversial topic in our society today, and (under the correct conditions) should both be considered legal and morally acceptable. In fact, throughout history euthanasia has been a debate in many countries, some areas accepting the practice, whereas others find it unacceptable. Many people and professionals continue to refer to the Hippocratic Oath, an vow stating the proper conduct for doctors, and it's famous words "Do no harm." However, when it comes down to whatever holds people back, whether it is their views on religion or oaths from many years ago, it should be considered a correct practice. In fact, in the case of Vacco v. Quill, one point raised was that "Over time, the Hippocratic Oath has been changed, and deleted. In order to "do-no-harm" one would end suffering instead of prolonging it." With the use of Supreme Court cases, and professional psychologist and medical quotations, one can see the clear reasons that this topic must be allowed. In the end, euthanasia should definitely be considered correct both legally and morally due to one's legal rights, sensible ethical values, and the multiple positive benefits upon the legalization of euthanasia.

As a result of this, many Catholics agree with the Catholic Church’s views on the topic of euthanasia in accordance with their faith. However, as the right of any human, a person can gather their own opinions on certain subjects, and there is also a presence of Catholics who are in favour of euthanasia. As with any human being, our decisions are based upon our moral beliefs and conscience, and this is likewise with Catholics. As stated in the Catechism, a person’s conscience is a very personal and important thing, and is also considered to be God’s voice acting within a person. Although contradictory to the Catholic Church’s teachings about euthanasia, there are also Catholics who approve and encourage euthanasia due to their

In 1995, Pope John Paul II said, “Euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person (“Euthanasia”).” The quote defines the Christian general point of view on euthanasia. It is due to the Christian belief that God

Moreover, euthanasia is restricted by the church. This is another important point that we should consider, especially for religious people. According to “Death and Dignity” it is emphasized that “Life is a gift from God and it is only God who can take it back”. Christian’s point of view considers euthanasia as a crime against church, religion and God. Christians consider this as an immoral act. When considering the religious factor as well, we can conclude that no one has the right to take control over our lives, especially when we are unconscious.

Millions of precious lives have been deliberately taken throughout the world due to the new Euthanasia Law. Euthanasia is the practicing of assisted suicide, due to terminally ill patients or depression. The practicing has just been legalized September 2015, and will be put into effect in California January 1 2016. Although, it is still being argued if adolescents should have the right fro this and if it’s morally correct all together. Euthanasia should be illegal throughout the world, because people shouldn’t be the ones to decide their own death.

Euthanasia is a popular debate among our society today. It raises major concerns in terms of morals and ethics. Some may argue that euthanasia is morally wrong, while others think as human beings; we have the right to self-determination and should be able to choose our own fate. Growing up in a Catholic family and being raised as a true believer of God, I think that euthanasia causes an ethical dilemma.

On the medical side there is questions to be answered. Like, is it ethical to take someone 's life even when they asked you repeatedly? A doctor takes the Hippocratic Oath to best treat their patient 's life. The question is, should we release them from suffering or continue in trying to help the individual during their time on earth? In the article "A problem for the idea of involuntary euthanasia", Neil Campbell analyzes ethnic and moral question of involuntary, voluntary and furthermore the restraints of physician assisted suicide. Campbell believes involuntary euthanasia may not exist because, "When a person asks to die under such conditions there is good reason to think that the decision to die is compelled by the pain and hence not freely chosen" (Campbell, 242) Is that request what the patient wants, or is it to end the pain? Another point to examine is their quality of the person 's life. Has their life disintegrated to the

Being that one in every fifty deaths are accounted for by the use of euthanasia, it has become a serious controversy on whether or not it should be outlawed or not. Multiple accounts of assisted suicide clearly display this debate. Whether it is a botched surgery, a chronic pain, or a terminal illness, there are better treatments that spare the life of a patient, also making the time and money invested in said patient well worth it. Religions across the globe, no matter how different, all agree, that life is about a connection with others, as well as a connection to yourself. To purposely give up on this freedom, is simply ludicrous. While euthanasia can be viewed as an easy solution to end the pains of the suffering, this immoral practice

Choices influence the way we live our everyday lives, whether they be tiny, seemingly inconsequential decisions, or whether they be life changing. The Catholic Church teaches us that as humans, God has given us free will, free will to make decisions for ourselves and in so doing, we have the ability to sin. Sin is an action violating God’s will. It is from Revelation and Natural Law that the Catholic Church’s ethical principles stem from. Principles govern our conduct, and what we define what is ethical and unethical by. A contemporary ethical issue is Euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as ‘the deliberate action causing the death of another person to spare them suffering.’ The issue is the subject of an ongoing worldwide debate for

For years, Euthanasia has been one of the biggest subjects of discussion around the world and, as expected, there are outstanding numbers of diverse viewpoints that are influenced by religion, morality, politics, medical principles, etc. The reason why this problematic is so popular is simple: Euthanasia is the action of ending intentionally a person’s life, and it is appropriate to highlight the fact that we have only one life. For that reason, numerous groups of people are against this operation. For example, some affirm that God will punish those who dare to end their life deliberately; others say that physicians who carry out this practice are undermining the supposed image they have as healers. So, why would you want to conclude your life? Would you choose to lose your only one shot by giving up on your own life? Although it seems to be an insane idea I believe that it could be

Euthanasia, the ‘mercy killing’, has definitely been one of the most difficult ethical dilemmas. Euthanasia is defined “an action or an omission, aimed at and causally implicated in, the death of another for her/his own sake” (Foot, 1997, as cited in Robert, 2004, p. 145). Euthanasia differs from murder, because the action causing the death is for the sake of the person to be killed. Someone might say that the person wanted to die anyway, so why ending his or her lives can be wrong? Is active euthanasia –acting to end the life of another- ever a right moral action? It is not an easy debate whether it is right or wrong to help end someone’s life. Some people might argue that

Euthanasia, which is also referred to as mercy killing, is the act of ending someone’s life either passively or actively, usually for the purpose of relieving pain and suffering. “All forms of euthanasia require an intention to accelerate death in order to benefit patients experiencing a poor quality of life” (Sayers, 2005). It is a highly controversial subject that often leaves a person with mixed emotions and beliefs. Opinions regarding this topic hinge on the health and mental state of the victim as well as method of death. It raises legal issues as well as the issue of morals and ethics. Euthanasia is divided into two different categories, passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. “There are unavoidable uncertainties in both active and

In current times we have made many technological advances that have boosted the medical productivity in hospitals. However, the rapid development of medicine is far from being a long term resolve for many health issues. We have a plethora of people whose quality of life is very low and has no chance of improving. During these situations allowing the person to end their life via euthanasia should be allowed. I will argue that Euthanasia is morally permissible in some cases because there are several moral justifications that argue for ending one’s life.

The World Medical Association (WMA) defines euthanasia as “the act of deliberately ending the life of a patient, even at the patient’s own request or at the request of close relatives.” Euthanasia refers to physician-assisted suicide, mercy killing and withdrawal of unwanted medical treatment (Taqi 266). It is debatably one of the most controversial issues in the fields of theology and medicine. Euthanasia stems from the Greek word for “a good death”.

Euthanasia has always been a controversial topic between the Catholic Church and society, as it is known as ‘Mercy Killing’. The Catholic Church’s perception of euthanasia is dissentient, as their strong beliefs demonstrate that it is unnecessary if ethics are followed through. However, society’s opinion contrasts, with the beliefs that it is a beneficial option for people who are undergoing a significant amount of pain or suffering. The Catholic Church believes that it can affect a person’s passage towards heaven and that it is a “morally unacceptable killing of a human person.” As is evident, the Catholic Church’s attitude strongly discourages the practice of euthanasia, therefore it is undetermined whether the increased desire for the legislation of euthanasia will ever be condoned by the church.