Is Fracking Good Or Bad

Fracking is not safe because in the areas where Fracking is taking place, it is causing crimes which isn’t beneficial to the economy, it causes methane to get into peoples water also it is effecting

Although Fracking gives us energy it is drilled from underneath the ground which can cause earthquakes. Natural gas is a gas that occurs beneath the earth’s surface. If a site seems promising an exploratory well may be drilled to collect data.In the united states and some other countries oil is drilled right from shales. So in conclusion Fracking is a good and bad thing for the world because it gives humans the energy they need but Fracking also causes a lot of problems.

Fracking is a major issue in our world right now, and yet it is still being done. Not everyone knows what fracking is, so let me explain. “Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. Water, sand, and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which allows the gas to flow out of the head of the well” (Shukman, David (2015), “What is fracking and why is it controversial?” http://www.bbc.com). There are tons of resources being put into fracking that is actually causing problems of its own. “Each gas well requires an average of 400 tanker trucks to carry water and supplies to and from the site” (N/A (2015),”Dangers of fracking”.

Sincewe can now use fracking to extract fossil fuels instead of relying on other countries for these resources, we can provide energy ourselves to other residents. There is an increase in the production of natural gas and there is an increase in the number of people employed in the production and delivery.Dangers of FrackingBurning fossil fuels causes air pollution, although burning gas causes less air pollution. There is water pollution, which is when large amounts of water that is full of dangerouschemicals is pumped into the ground and is supposed to be extracted after the process of fracking, but sometimes the water doesn’t rise up, and seeps into the ground and leaks into water ways such as lakes and rivers and pollutes them. The process of fracking can release chemicals into the air that may cause health problems. If we continue to rely on gas either than finding a new and better resource, we will still add to the amount of greenhouse gases which will be problematic in the future.Using Frackingin the FutureFracking is a good way of getting oil and gas, but whether we should use it in the future or not is debatable. It is a very good way to get these resources that are thousands of feet in the ground, but it also causes problems. I think it should be used in the future because it is an efficient way of getting these resources. EnergyGiven the advantages of nuclear power, do you think Canada should concentrate on

Fracking Kills the World Around Us Abbey Burns Missouri State University General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: By the end of the speech the audience will know the negative effects fracking has on the environment. Thesis Statement: Fracking causes detrimental effects to the environment including the pollution in our atmosphere, contamination of water, and an increase in earthquakes. Introduction: “Environmental pollution is an incurable disease. It can only be prevented – Barry Commoner.”

Fracking is a very debated topic around the world, whether we should continue fracking for the oil and gas it produces, or if the pollution caused by fracking is too much of problem. On the negative side of fracking, the effects from include: worsened asthma, stress, heavy pollution around the oil and gas sites, etc. If you look on the positive side of fracking you’ll find it is a way of producing oil and gas that could take America to the top in terms of energy export around the world, and it creates numerous jobs, which surely helps out the American economy.

Another reason I think fracking is a bad thing is because fracking can harm the environment. Fracking can do many different things to the environment the main thing it does to the environment is it cracks the ground, which can cause a major catastrophe on a major scale, like earthquakes. You do not want an earthquake to happen do you?

Do you think fracking should be used to release oils and natural gases? I personally think fracking shouldn't be used to release oil and natural gas because of all the protentional dangers it might cause. The risk of fracking is very detrimental and can cause serious climate issues. The world is already dealing with enough problems with the climate, so if fracking was to be used to release oils and natural the issues may stack up and cause issues for future societies.Firstly, what is Fracking? Hydraulic fracturing, or what is known is fracking is a cost-saving process for drilling oil. The dangers of fracking can be contamination of groundwater, methane and air pollution, toxic chemical exposure, earthquakes, and many more issues that go along

Fracking has actually changed out future as we know it, and has made it possible for many things. Fracking will make the world run on natural fossil fuels for much longer, which is also better for the environment and us. In 2015, the U.S. reached its all time high in oil production in 14 years and is only expected to continually rise. Oil production in the U.S. is one of the main sources of jobs for people living in the U.S. (Nunez, 2013). Fracking is a good way to employ U.S. citizens and is also a good way to get natural ways of oil production. As we all

Fracking has killed farmer’s livestock and it leaked into the farmers plants. When the oil drillers drill sometimes it leaches out of the ground and gets in the plants. Chemicals spilling from fracking could contaminate the plants.Fracking has also caused a lot of earthquakes. In conclusion fracking is bad for the environment because it has killed farmers, livestock and ruined the plants.

The main reason people oppose fracking is that fracking is believed to cause geological instability. In 2011 Prague, Oklahoma experienced an earthquake of 5.7 magnitude and was confirmed to me a direct result of pumping millions of gallons of flow back water underground. This catastrophe destroyed 14 homes, damaged about 200 buildings, and was felt across 17 states (Prud'Homme). This incident and the other 2 in 2011 show that class II Hydro fracking wells in particular cause geological instability. As a direct result of this instability it allows the ground water to be contaminated with deadly chemicals.

According to anti fracking people, fracking is destroying our groundwater, and causing air pollution. Natural gas is burned at well sites, “this is considered to be safer than releasing methane into the atmosphere because CO2 is not as potent a greenhouse gas such as methane.”(natural gas and the environment) Even Lisa Jackson the head of the Environmental Agency has seen no proof that fracking has affected drinking water. People who say that fracking causes air pollution, but in reality the gas that is used in fracking is actually safer to use than other gases like benzene. The gas is used for electricity, cooking and heating houses and without it people would be wasting other resources. “Natural gas is flared or burned at well sites.” This

Fracking is the leading case in people getting sick or maybe worse. I think that fracking is good for lighting and heating are home but can really hurt the economy. Fracking can lead to earthquakes and it my let you light your tap water on fire and may cause death.

While I respect your views, I personally disagree with using fracking. Though fracking has a ton of support for its positive externalities such as increasing jobs, being a cheaper energy source, and decreasing the U.S.'s dependence on foreign oil, there is great concern regarding fracking's negative externalities; for instance, fracking does a lot of potential environmental damage. I think the biggest issues with fracking that we should focus on are: water contamination, how fracking drives potential investment toward clean energy away, and the lenient legislation and penalties currently put on fracking does not suffice in terms of lessening potential safety risks.

I guess, with this evidence, my uncle would have probably said, “well then, this further proves that we don’t need electric and hybrid technology.” There are too many controversies with fracking though, at least for me, to accept this as a long-term solution. To give you just an abbreviated idea of some of frackings issues, here is a shortlist. It requires that we pump millions of gallons of water mixed with tens of thousands of gallons of chemicals into the ground, which could potentially seep into our drinking water sources. The water used for fracking must remain in the earth once contaminated for proper disposal. How can we remove this much water from the natural cycle when there are so many locations already susceptible to drought conditions? This process has also been causing a multitude of earthquakes in regions that before did not have them. Another drawback is that during the fracking process methane gas could be and likely is being leaked into the atmosphere. Methane gas is even worse for the greenhouse effect than the carbon dioxide we usually worry over (Loki).