Is Google Making USupid Analysis

In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr expresses his beliefs and personal experiences on how the internet has altered our brains and how we think. He addresses the fact that, although our brains’ abilities to deep read and concentrate are suffering, the internet is extremely beneficial and convenient. Because of the easy accessibility, it takes little to no effort to find information, and therefore, a minimal amount of thinking is required. Carr highlights that people are more impatient because of the internet and that our minds are becoming more erratic. The author used research, conducted by a U.K. educational consortium, to show that a new form of reading is developing over time; rather than reading every word on a page, it has turned to more of a skimming method. Nicholas Carr realizes that we may be doing more reading than ever due to the internet, but it is different in the way that people have to interpret the text. Reading, unlike talking, is not a natural ability. One must learn to deep read, make connections, and translate the underlying meaning. Overall, Carr believes it is a mistake to rely fully on computers because in the end, it will just be our own intelligence that morphs into artificial intelligence.

In Nicholas Carr’s, “Is google making us stupid,” Carr indicates a problem that affects a majority of the internet users; that being as time we spend on the internet increases, the more we are diminishing our intellectual ability, and loosing the ability to become intertwined in a lengthy article or an extended book. He is suggesting that the technology we are in contact with on a daily basis, has a negative effect on our cognitive ability, and is forcing our brain’s to evolve. Throughout the article, Carr argues the negative effect media, mainly the internet, is having on his capacity and concentration: he effectively argues his point through the uses of many rhetoric appeals, that draw in the reader. His use of logos, compares the past and

Media and technology are permeating and changing every part of our lives, but are there consequences to these changes? Nicholas Carr questions if the Internet is helping people as much as it is believed to in his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” With an increased reliance on the Internet, Carr has found patterns of shortened attention in himself and among others. Carr points out frightening changes occurring in human behavior and the workings of the brain that have now become evident in our society’s younger generation and could have devastating consequences.

On Carr's stance on the question, is Google making us stupid, I would be compelled to disagree with him and say that it's actually making us smarter. His idea of saying that we are becoming stupid because of Google is a paradox because we learn so much every day from going to Google and researching something and he's saying that his ability to concentrate is diminishing. Instances that actually enable us to become smarter by using Google would be the way we can instantly find information, because of the internet we are now reading far more than we did in the 1970s, and because of how we read on the internet, we changed our style of reading to a style that puts efficiency and immediacy above everything. We are just adapting to a new type of

The emergence and use of computer and internet technologies have greatly revolutionized the world. Everything and every process in the world is attuning to computer and internet technology for effective survival and success. Human beings have succumbed to the greatest effect of the revolution. Initially, human beings conducted their activities and processes manually even when using machines. Today, people largely depend on computerized technologies and automated systems to conduct and run activities and processes. In the article, “Is Google making us stupid?”, Nicholas Carr is showing concern and worry over the way the computer and internet technology have compromised cognitive and reasoning abilities of human beings. The arguments and themes discussed by Nicholas in the article are true and reflect the exact situation in the contemporary world. Carr demonstrates why he believes that the platform that Google offers to speedily access information online is reducing people’s level of concentration and shifts their intelligence. Arguably, the author demonstrates how he believes that Google regularly seizes people’s concentration. That is, internet users can know of something but fail to understand the sources and validity of

Is The Internet Changing The Way We Think? Technology is advancing almost every day in some way shape or form. Technology is machinery and equipment developed from the application of scientific knowledge. There are things we use every day that aren’t considered technology.

Andrew Brown once said, “The Internet is so big, so powerful and pointless that for some people it is a complete substitute for life.” However is that truly the case with today’s technology, is the internet pointless. It is possible however the internet offers education and learning opportunities but again does the good outweigh the bad. Well that is a matter of prospective. In Nickolas Carr prospective it does not, this can be based off of reading “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by him. In the article he shows proof of his beliefs and ideals within his main statements. An example of one is when he talks about his focus issues, and how he can no longer be completely immersed in a book because he starts to fidgety while reading. He then talks

This article by Nicholas Carr is about the access we have to the Internet nowadays and how it affects our intelligence. It tells us how dependent we are of Internet and how we get affected by the technology around us. It also says how Google is trying to replace our brains, which are not fast enough, with a faster contrived brain. Carr claims that the accessibility to fast information is making us stupid and less focused. “He notes that the Internet is causing people to want fast information, rather than read through a long article.” The availability for fast information is affecting our minds and makes people stressed.

The internet is changing our brain for the worse. While we get to communicate with each other better and have a lot of information at our fingertips, we lose many important things as well. We are quick to congratulate the success of Google and Apple that we miss the real danger. Nicholas Carr shows us how we aren't seeing the real danger of the internet and he tells us what we are sacrificing for the internet. He explains to us how the internet is making us easily distracted, removes our ability to think linearly, and weakens our capability to learn.

The advent of technology transforms our vision of things, our way of life, learn to think on a daily basis. Is google making us stupid? That is the question posed by Nicholas Carr. This may lead us to the question of the influence of the internet and other systems on our daily habits; it appears that those can also affect our way of thinking critically.

In 2008, Nicholas Carr wrote a very profound article explaining how the internet that everyone has believed to be a useful tool in society and something to help us learn and grow, was actually making us less intelligent. On the first page of the article he starts to explain his own personal tribulations that the internet has caused him, like how his attention span was lessened by the immediate access of the internet. The reason his attention span was dwindling was because of the readily quick information on the internet that is easily accessible by the click of a button. Reading from the internet has caused him to scan things to get the gist of what the article is actually saying that he is reading. He talked to many others and he realized

In the article "Does the Internet Make You Dumber?", Carr (2010) shows the drawbacks of the Internet. He states that people depend on the Internet. A long-term influence of the Internet can change continually the structure of the human brain. Carr explains that the Internet distracts or interrupts people‘s attention and may lead them to think shallowly. His purpose is to warn people to control themselves when using technology.

Carr’s article begins by explaining how the Internet is something that we can benefit from, however, he suggests that we rely too much on technology to make anything we do uncomplicated and more productive. Carr believes that the Internet is changing and controlling our brains. He agrees that our brains worked like clockwork in the past and since the invention of the computer, they seem to work more like computers. He claims that the Internet is also to blame for our decreasing attention spans. His friends and acquaintances agree that they have problems focusing when they read long pieces of information. Bruce Friedman, a blogger, supports Carr’s theory by stating that he is unable to read and comprehend long books or articles. He fully believes

The Internet has replaced the canine as man’s best friend. In our world today, we have been consumed by the internet and have adopted an obsession with it. In “The Juggler’s Brain,” the seventh chapter from his book, The Shallows, Nicholas Carr discusses the change in the human brain, both physically and functionally. He claims that the internet is probably the “most powerful mind-altering technology that has ever come into general use” and that because we have become so accustomed to using it, we have been subject to its effects on our cognition and comprehensive depth (Carr 116). The Internet has become an essential part of society without which we seemingly can’t function; although, because of it, our functionality has suffered. Throughout his argument, Carr very thoroughly supports his claim of the Internet’s effects on the human brain citing numerous experiments and much experimental data on the subject. His argument is logical, clear, concise, multi-faceted, and well supported across the chapter. Carr successfully argues that the Internet is producing grave changes to the human cognitive process through the use of sound, supporting examples and seemingly contradictory evidence that actually gives more merit to his claim.

Since the use of the internet is still a new mode of accessing information, there is very little we know about the effects it has on our brains. Even what we are finding now could be interpreted for or against internet use. In the article “Neuroscience: Browsing and the Brain,” the authors analyze two books written by experts in the field that have opposing views. Both see similar information, but one interprets it as positive effects and the other sees them as negative. Since the topic is still relatively new, we don’t have enough evidence to make a definite statement in either direction. Nicholas Carr’s book The Shallows, according to the authors in the article, takes a negative view on the research available. He sees the activity of using the internet as a negative experience because the changes it causes the brain may lead to loss of other ways of processing information. In Nick Bilton’s I Live in the Future sees the use of the internet as solely positive, creating new possibilities for the human brain to function, allowing the brain to adapt and explore the new possibilities.