Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr: Article Analysis

Consistently there is some new innovative progression advancing into the world trying to make life simpler for individuals. In the article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", writer Nicholas Carr clarifies his contemplations on how he trusts the web is risking making individuals loaded with simulated information. Carr starts by clarifying how he feels that the web is bringing on his center issues, how he can never again be totally submerged in a book, and the motivation behind why he gets restless while perusing. He then goes ahead to discuss how his life is encompassed by the web and how that is the fault for the issues he has towards not having the capacity to stay associated with a content; however, in the meantime says how and why the web has been a

When assessing the risks of digital technology’s role in our future, many reflect on the developments of new technology throughout history. Nicholas Carr, author of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” uses historical examples to support his claim that we should fear technological advancements. In contrast, Brooke Gladstone and Josh Neufeld, authors of “The Influencing Machines,” examine both sides of the issue and ultimately conclude that we should not fear technological development. One technological development Carr as well as Gladstone and Neufeld examined was the printing press. Carr asserts that most of the arguments about the printing press turned out to be correct including that it “would undermine religious authority, demean the work of scholars

In Nicholas Carr (Is Google Making Us Stupid?) he expresses his thoughts of the internet, and how it is effecting our minds. He goes in on how it becomes hard to comprehend long articles and books. It seems as if our brains start to become unfocused as we try not to skim the words; yet, or brains do as they please causing us to become distracted from the writings in front of us.

In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that easy access to information on the internet causes a shorter attention span, and makes people incapable to solve problems unassisted. According to Carr, typical readers have become lazy because of being spoiled by the access of thousands of sources of information that can be found on the internet. Rather than reading a book, or doing thorough research on a subject, the reader will commonly answer a question by searching for it on the internet. This method not only diminishes the attention span, but also comes off as lazy due to the fact that the reader won’t put in the time and effort it takes to actually learn a subject.

In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains”, Nicholas Carr points out the fact that google is affecting our brains. He explains how being able to access information more quickly is minimizing the amount of thinking we have to do on our own and therefore preventing our brain to do deep thinking. On the second paragraph the author says, “I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it more strongly when I’m reading”. I strongly agree with the author’s point because when I used to live in the Dominican Republic I didn’t have access to google and had to go to the library and check out books to do my homework assignments. I wasn’t intimidated by the length of the reading and was able to find the

In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that the internet is changing the way the human mind processes information. He contends that the instant access to information through Google, though it offers efficiency and immediacy, is rewiring our brains and diminishing our capacity for concentration and contemplation, thus destroying our intelligence. He believes that it is causing a loss of ability to concentrate whilst reading detailed books or other long narratives. He warns that this alarming biological development can potential flatten human experience because we no longer hold the innate need to fully divulge into details. Carr successfully utilizes facts, examples, scholars and well-known thinkers, argument appeals of ethos, pathos and logos to skillfully and effectively compose a well-organized argument about the internet’s negative

From beginning to ending, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” written by Nicholas Carr implements a scene from A Space Odyssey, where Bowman disconnects HAL’s circuits as it repeats, “I can feel it. I can feel it” to underscore the notion of humans becoming more robotic than a robot itself as we continue to rely on technology. Carr portrays this notion through several examples when he, his colleagues, and an individual like Friedman experience a shift in their style in writing or reading as they use certain technological tools. These resourceful technologies force individuals to make adaptations to “patterns” that ultimately influence their lifestyles. Carr consistently provides significant amounts of evidence for his argument and in depth information

I found the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? “, written by Elizabeth Carr, very interesting (Carr, 2005). I enjoyed how it provided different examples of the increased dependency on technological advances in today's society. This increased dependency has also cause an increased demand for the ability to have access to the internet in almost any place; you can now have a car that has a continuous connection to an internet source so you’re never off the grid.

In an article by Nicholas Carr, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the author is questioning the readers about the internet and making suggestions that the internet is changing how our brains operate. Throughout the article, the author's main point is to inform us about the negative effects of the internet on humans.

In any discussion of the internet, one controversial issue is that the internet is causing more harm than good. On the one hand, Nicholas Carr, writer of “Is Google making us Stupid?” argues that it has caused damaging effects to his brain and memory. On the other hand, Mr. Carr contends that there are many blessings that come with the internet. My own view is mixed as well. The internet can begin to answer virtually any question I may have. However, I have notice the attention span of the people around me is slowly decreasing. With Google doing most of the thinking for us we are no longer forced to memorize thing. So when it comes to the internet are we really losing or winning?

In one second; 58,779 web pages were searched; 68,166 YouTube videos viewed; 2,564,746 email sent; 766 Instagram pictures posted; and 7,513 tweets tweeted(Lee). Day to day, the Internet is becoming an important part of daily life, but it comes with a price. Some people think the Internet makes us less efficient thinkers. In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” Nicholas Carr asserts that the Internet is distracting, and it changes the way we think. I did not agree with Carr that the Internet affects our ability to think efficiently before reading the article; however, I know think that it has negative impacts on our contemplation, and I agree that artificial intelligence will

In his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr discusses his belief that the internet is negatively changing the way people’s brains process and consume information. Carr describes this phenomenon when he writes, “as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence” (328). Carr’s point is that the less effort put into reading and researching caused by societies constant access to the internet, lessens deep thinking and mental growth, which in turn results in a loss of individualism in our society. Incidentally, in his article, “Smarter than you Think”, writer Clive Thompson agrees with Carr’s statement by saying, “Today’s multitasking tools really do make it harder than before to stay focused during long acts of reading and contemplation” (355). However, Thompson goes on to argue that the benefits humans derive from the advancements being made in technology outweigh the possible risks in changes to cognitive functions caused by the melding of man with machine. Thompson builds his argument by examining how the game of chess has evolved

The web is a worldwide PC organize giving an assortment of data, permitting individuals the simplicity of gets to and productivity of finding the information they crave, however there are a few disadvantages to the web. In the article "Is Google Making Us Stupid" the writer Nicholas Carr's subject on the web is that the data that is expressed to is so efficient and effective to information that our minds don’t processes as well as retain the knowledge thrown at us. Carr contends that the web is rewiring his cerebrum. The way Carr believes is divergent, making basic considering, breaking down, and revealing verifiable dialect in the content exceptionally troublesome. He fears that the web make us lose the not just the capacity to hold the information

Ian Leslie’s article, “Google Makes Us All Dumber”, depicts how search engines like Google are making people have accustomed people to become dependent on finding answers to their question in a quick and easy matter. Leslie argues that the Internet is causing people to be less curious about learning new information because they know that any question they have can be answered within a fast Google

In the article “Is Google making us stupid?” Nicholas Carr is arguing that the internet and the computer are making our reading abilities less and our attention span lower. In the article, he is saying that people are immersing themselves in the computer screens and t.v. shows which are making their minds “less efficient.” Furthermore, he examined that every new technology such as the typewriter and the printing press has put persons less capable of understanding and comprehending than before. First, he gave us the example of the Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, where the computer is taking over the human. Nest, the examples is off ,Friedrich Nietzsche, a writer failing to express himself to his friend in a personal letter after he