Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr Summary

Nicholas Carr's Atlantic Online article "Is Google Making Us Stupid," talks about how the utilization of the PC influences our point of view. Carr begins discussing his own particular experience as an author and how he felt like "something had been tinkering with his cerebrum, remapping his neural hardware and reinventing his memory". Since beginning to utilize the Internet his exploration strategies have changed. Carr said before he would drench himself in books, protracted articles and long extends of composition permitting his "brain to become involved with the story or the arguments"(July/August 2008, Atlantic Monthly). Today Carr has found that "his fixation floats away from the content after a few pages and he battles to get once again into the content". His reason is that since he has put in the previous ten years working internet, looking and surfing and composing substance for databases" his cerebrum hardware has changed. He shows that some of his kindred scholars have encountered the same sorts of changes in their perusing books and looking after fixation. Some of them said they don't read books as effortlessly on the grounds that their fixation and center has get to be shorter.

Over the years, technology has developed into something that we cannot live without. Society is constantly being dictated and reshaped by the newest technology. In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, he expounded on the uncomfortable sense that someone, or something was tinkering with his brain. He realized that he’s not thinking the way he used to. Additionally, he explains how our brains aren’t familiar with critical thinking anymore. He also introduces the idea that the Internet is doing more harm to us than good. I believe Carr’s ideas on the negative effects of the Internet are well founded. The validity surrounds us daily.

When assessing the risks of digital technology’s role in our future, many reflect on the developments of new technology throughout history. Nicholas Carr, author of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” uses historical examples to support his claim that we should fear technological advancements. In contrast, Brooke Gladstone and Josh Neufeld, authors of “The Influencing Machines,” examine both sides of the issue and ultimately conclude that we should not fear technological development. One technological development Carr as well as Gladstone and Neufeld examined was the printing press. Carr asserts that most of the arguments about the printing press turned out to be correct including that it “would undermine religious authority, demean the work of scholars

Nicholas Carr stated a couple true statements, but I disagree that google is making us stupid. In the article, Carr explained how reading has drastically increased throughout the years. He is indeed correct about this. During this generation, people rely on the internet to provide accurate essential facts, which one can gain valuable knowledge from. Those who skim through articles or never read a book due to losing concentration after reading three pages are not lacking intelligence, but lack ambition and motivation.

Throughout his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr uses several terms and phrases that enhance his argument. One key term that is central to Carr’s argument is the word “reprogramming”. Carr uses this word several times throughout his article to assert his claim that the Internet is “reprogramming” or changing our minds in a way that alters our thinking and memory. By using this term, it seems that Carr adds gravity to the possibility that the Internet is changing our minds for the worst. Likewise, Carr mentions that the Internet is interfering with our “concentration” and causing it to “drift” from certain activities such as deep reading. He argues that our brain is scattering with frequent use of the Internet. It is hard

In Nicholas Carr's story "Is Google Making Us Stupid" his fundamental point is the issue, is fast access to the web making people more restless to peruse and need to skim through stuff more. This story is an extremely well useful story. Carr uses google as a similitude for the more extensive web. At the point when Carr poses the question is google making us inept, he may have set an alert for some. In the story he gets profound clarification of how the web impacts the cerebrum. The clarification he gives us is the way PCs have modified the way we work, how we sort out data, offer news, convey, and how we hunt down, read, and assimilate data. Carr's investigation joins research, and additionally reasoning, science, history, and social advancements.

The essay Is Google Making Us Stupid by the author Nicholas Carr, was originally a cover article of The Atlantic in 2008. The purpose of his work is to warn the technology users of the negative effects that these devices have in humans. Carr starts the essay with a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey in which one of the characters describes how his mind and the way he reads is changing by the time since he has been using a computer. He is no longer able to spend hours reading, describes how to get concentrate in a long paragraphs is difficult to him. The fact of how fast the internet works, forces his brain to process information the way Net does.

I found the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? “, written by Elizabeth Carr, very interesting (Carr, 2005). I enjoyed how it provided different examples of the increased dependency on technological advances in today's society. This increased dependency has also cause an increased demand for the ability to have access to the internet in almost any place; you can now have a car that has a continuous connection to an internet source so you’re never off the grid.

In an article by Nicholas Carr, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the author is questioning the readers about the internet and making suggestions that the internet is changing how our brains operate. Throughout the article, the author's main point is to inform us about the negative effects of the internet on humans.

In one second; 58,779 web pages were searched; 68,166 YouTube videos viewed; 2,564,746 email sent; 766 Instagram pictures posted; and 7,513 tweets tweeted(Lee). Day to day, the Internet is becoming an important part of daily life, but it comes with a price. Some people think the Internet makes us less efficient thinkers. In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” Nicholas Carr asserts that the Internet is distracting, and it changes the way we think. I did not agree with Carr that the Internet affects our ability to think efficiently before reading the article; however, I know think that it has negative impacts on our contemplation, and I agree that artificial intelligence will

In his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr discusses his belief that the internet is negatively changing the way people’s brains process and consume information. Carr describes this phenomenon when he writes, “as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence” (328). Carr’s point is that the less effort put into reading and researching caused by societies constant access to the internet, lessens deep thinking and mental growth, which in turn results in a loss of individualism in our society. Incidentally, in his article, “Smarter than you Think”, writer Clive Thompson agrees with Carr’s statement by saying, “Today’s multitasking tools really do make it harder than before to stay focused during long acts of reading and contemplation” (355). However, Thompson goes on to argue that the benefits humans derive from the advancements being made in technology outweigh the possible risks in changes to cognitive functions caused by the melding of man with machine. Thompson builds his argument by examining how the game of chess has evolved

Nicholas Carr argues in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” that the internet is changing the way we think and work for the worst by reducing our ability to concentrate on books, and long articles. Google is reshaping our brain, we have become accustom to skimming through headline and jumping from one article to the next without completing the first. The internet is altering our learning by giving us access multiple distraction such as emails, social media, and advertisements all these factors contributing to our lack of concentration when attempting to absorb information.

The web is a worldwide PC organize giving an assortment of data, permitting individuals the simplicity of gets to and productivity of finding the information they crave, however there are a few disadvantages to the web. In the article "Is Google Making Us Stupid" the writer Nicholas Carr's subject on the web is that the data that is expressed to is so efficient and effective to information that our minds don’t processes as well as retain the knowledge thrown at us. Carr contends that the web is rewiring his cerebrum. The way Carr believes is divergent, making basic considering, breaking down, and revealing verifiable dialect in the content exceptionally troublesome. He fears that the web make us lose the not just the capacity to hold the information

Over the course of years technology has expanded tremendously. In the beginning being in the library trying to look up information was the norm. Now in the 20th century everything is literally at our fingertips. Google has become a necessity for many people. For example, if a computer came without google or and other search engine would a person still buy it. Would they be willing to go and take the time to do research elsewhere? Is the dependency of google and the internet in general affecting our everyday thinking and how we run our lives? Nicholas Carr and a few others questioned this theory.

In Nicholas Carr's article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” the point he is trying to make is that the internet has become the worlds main source of information and entertainment, and its starting to effect how people read and how fast they can find and interpret information. The author states that even though internet makes the process much faster and more efficient it makes our brains miss the learning curve that helps us fully understand the deep and thought provoking novels or articles.