Is It Necessary For Law Enforcement?

Policing requires members to balance both between the wishes of the public and of politicians regarding how they are to enforce and appropriately uphold the law in their respective areas (Phillips, 1984). The most important element of accountability can be seen of the knowledge that the police as an institution and as individuals must not be subject to undue influence by any individual, be it as within the general public or as a part of the law enforcement community. Where law enforcement acts objectively and neutrally in the upholding of the law, the general public becomes aware of the knowledge that as long as the law is obeyed and remains unviolated, there is no reason to fear the legal and penal justice system. On the other hand, if law enforcement is seen to be influenced by external bribery or internal governmental pressure, the wider public becomes aware that the only true law is that of the economic or political influence being brought to bear on law enforcement members, therefore invalidating the notion of due process, and making a mockery of the entire system of justice in

Trust is an incredible trait to have. Some may say that without trust the world wouldn’t go around. But what exactly is trust? Merriam-Webster defines trust as “ one in which confidence is placed”(“Trust”). Confidence is a whole big impact that goes along with the feeling of trust. Being a trustworthy person means that people can rely on you for things. Trust can lead to a lot of danger also. If trust is broken, There can be a lot of lack of communication because someone might not trust you with some things. Trust might not come as just vocally trust. When you are asked to do something a certain way, you are trusted you will get it done in that way. Trust is a very important thing in everyday life.

When individuals have little or no respect towards the police, they are most likely to ignore the requests or demands of officers. This can lead to the officer having to use force in order to gain control of a situation. Peel felt that “The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.” (Westminster Police Department, 2012) When police are faced with dispersing large crowds, it is necessary for the public to have the respect to follow police orders. When individuals lack trust and respect for the police, riots may occur, which can also lead to arrests, serious injuries, and even death.

The true meaning of trust is the “firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something” from Merrian Webster. This tells you that trust is something that is hard to get. People these days can’t do all these things. Trust is a rare thing to have with a person. Trust is something you have to give your all to.

While law enforcement plays a large role in the everyday lives of American citizens, many people distrust and fear the police officers that have promised to “serve and protect” them. Although some people may view the dejection and anger aimed at police as illogical or even ungrateful, these feelings are not unfounded. Trust between the police and their communities has been eroded by controversial shootings, including Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Alton Sterling, and Philando Castile. The deaths of these men and other cases of police misconduct have led to cries of outrage and demands for police accountability from American communities (Brooks). And while the police undoubted have one of the most important and dangerous jobs in the country, their work should be held up to the highest possible standards due to the life or death circumstances and consequences that their work involves.

In the 1960s the policeman were assigned to duty inorder to uphold law and not to get personally involved with individuals or neighbors (Hoover, L 2014). They were also assigned to uphold justice and not to show partiality. But as history proves a different approached was taken by the police. Instead of showing impartiality they did just the opposite. Based on our study the police were attacking peaceful protestors, because of the police actions riots broke out in almost every city in the Unites States which caused a lack of distrust in the law enforcement (Hoover, L 2014).

Law enforcement leaders must be continually vigilant to ensure that the actions of their officers do not violate civil rights and do not compromise public support. The individual officer is granted a tremendous amount of authority and discretion to enforce the law. Their ultimate duty is to protect individual rights from being infringed upon by others in the community. They must never consider themselves above the law while executing their responsibility to enforce the law. This commitment is what distinguishes police in constitutionally based, democratic societies like ours from police in nondemocratic countries, where they are perceived as oppressive agents of a government whose main purpose is to restrict, rather than protect, the rights of civilians (International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2006).

Without police, the safety of the community is jeopardized. Without community support, police are dispossessed of their legitimacy and robbed of their effectiveness. This three-element definition of police makes it easy to understand why abuse of force by police is of such great concern. First, there is the humanitarian concern that police are capable of inflicting serious, even lethal, harm on the public. Second, there is the philosophical dilemma that in "protecting" the whole of society, some of its constituent parts, meaning its citizens, may be injured. Third, there is the political irony that police, who stand apart from society in terms of authority, law, and responsibility, also are part of society and act on its behalf. Thus, rogue actions by a few police, if condoned by the public, may become perceived as actions of the citizenry. Recent developments in policing have elevated concerns about police use of force beyond ordinarily high levels. In particular, community policing, which is becoming widespread as a result of financial incentives by the Federal Government, and "aggressive" policing, which is becoming widely adopted as a solution to serious crime problems, have come to the fore as perspectives of choice by policing experts. Community policing emphasizes

We learned in this course that, “people’s views of police legitimacy are more strongly linked to perceptions of the fairness of the procedures used by police to make decisions, than to the actual outcome of their encounter with police, or the effectiveness of the police controlling crime. “

If there is a question of trust between the local community and law enforcement, there is a larger chance of outcry in the form of protest that could lead to violence breaking out between the two groups. When the leadership of law enforcement department reaches out to local community leaders to build a robust and lasting relationship between them and the community they cannot only use their respect by members of the community to support them in times of troubles between them and the community they can also reach out to the community leaders to de-escalate the troubles as well (Abegbile,

Trust is a word that is constantly used by people on a regular basis. It is always being given, taken back, tested, or confirmed, and it is something that is prevalent in literature. In King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table, King Arthur, the notably gallant and selfless leader of Britain, partakes on quests with his knights that require bravery and chivalry. As presented through the actions of characters in King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table, trust is the belief in the reliability of someone and it is something that is earned, not rashly given; it is given based on the qualities, reputation, or the strength of the relationship with that someone.

Social Problem Police in any democratic society are faced with an inescapable dilemma. Their role requires them to adequately balance the legal authority they have been granted by the public (through government officials) with their responsibility to protect individual rights and to contribute to public safety. Police officers are a walking symbol of government authority. They have the power to stop, detain, question, arrest, and even use deadly force when necessary Police officers must be responsive to the wishes of the public. They must carry out the complex task while respecting important legal and constitutional protections.

Our society bases many of the problems on the perceptions they have about the lawfulness and legitimacy of their local law enforcement agencies. Having lawfulness and legitimacy are a must if law enforcement agencies are going to reach their goals of fighting crime, serving the community, and making neighborhoods safer places to live and work. When there is a lack of legitimacy, the law enforcement agency and the community will have a haphazard relationship. Lawful conduct

There are two demanding issues within the fields of policing, one is amassed inhabitant trust in the constabularies and fostering United States conglomerates amid constabularies and areas they serve. Civivillians in the United States in general to have sympathetic views of constabularies, conversely the less contact individuals have with constabularies, the more likely they are to have optimistic slants of the constabularies. Given the impression that run-ins with the constabularies interpose towards discouraging views of them and critiques of their services. On behalf of the constables procedural justice, which emphasis on the nature of the relations of constabularies and the communities, has caught the interest from scholars and specialists. “”The procedural justice approach holds that citizens’ perceived fairness in interactions with police is positive and related to favorable attitudes.”” (Gau, 2010; Harvell, 2008; Resig at al., 2007; Tyler, 2006 and Huo, 2002). Not amazed by how many numerous findings that show procedural justice influences civilians discernment about the constabularies but not only inclination to liaise with them. Its universally accepted that the irrefutable attitudes regarding disposition to help in the law-enforcement investigation and have a wide-range implications for the legitimacy of constabularies and communal control. “” According to Tyler (1997) the primary impact of experience on views about the overall legitimacy of authorities innovative judgements about how one is treated. People value a respectful treatment by authorities and view those authorities who treat them with respect as more entitled to be obeyed.”” (pp.

Having trust makes one fell safe and free of fear enough so that they can focus on other things.