Is Julius Caesar Justified

“I love the name of honor, more than I fear death,” a quote said by one of the most famous Roman leaders named Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was born in July 100 BC and he died on March 15, 44B.C. Caesar was a general, politician, and a dictator. Caesar was loved by many people for guiding them and providing safety for them, but he was also hated by a countless number of people. That hate ended up in him being murdered. He gave Rome hope for a better future and a promise of new land, jobs, and wealth. Caesar accomplished many things for his country like win many victories, developed the Julian calendar, and redistributed land to the poor. He used many different tactics and strategies to win his wars. Through brilliant military tactics, Julius Caesar, ruler of Rome from 49 B.C. to 44 B.C., guided the people of Italy and Rome to achieve many victories, allowing him to become a powerful ruler, hero, and inspiration and leaving a legacy that still shapes the world today.

Honor and loyalty are the most important personal traits of a person, but it can also be the opposite depending how it is expressed. Honor means you keep your word , no matter what. It also means you do what is best for yourself and others around you. When somebody is honorable to you, you respect them , and trust them. Honorable people are also normally known as responsible and likable. In some cases, people think they are doing what is honorable, but really they are not.

If anyone seasoned in Julius Caesar’s background was asked if his death was justified or not, the answer would most likely be no. He was kind, smart, selfless, and and advocate for the citizens. Although he was arrogant and thought himself a king, he did nothing to deserve death. His death was unjustified and he was only killed because of his power and influence over the commoners. Several of his associates felt unsafe and were worried about their loss and his gain of power.

Power is the ultimate goal of many throughout their life. If power is taken advantage of it

The United States would not be the same today if Abraham Lincoln was never assassinated on the unfortunate night of April 14, 1865. His killer, John Wilkes Booth, had a strong resent for the Union that subsequently caused a dramatic shift in history. This hatred was caused by many factors, such as his background and where he grew up, his lust for power and fame, and his mental illness. John Wilkes Booth, a master assassinator and conspirator, hoped to strengthen the confederacy by killing Abraham Lincoln. However, this murder created an even stronger opposition to the South than ever before.

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar there were many people that had major faults that hurt them but also so helped them in some cases. For example; Antony, Cassius, Brutus, and even Caesar himself. in that day in age patriotism was a noble thing and as many people stated Brutus was a noble man. Brutus didn't believe Caesar should have been in power and that Caesar was overly ambitious and that his ambition would cause problems for the kingdom.

The assassination of President Lincoln was so tragic because both Abraham Lincoln and John Wilkes Booth both believed they were doing the right thing. Abraham Lincoln wanted freedom for all because he believed that was right. He knew not everyone agreed and that was why America was having a Civil War but he felt that it was the right thing to do. John Wilkes Booth believed that there should be slaves in the south and did not agree with President Lincoln at all. He believed that everyone really agreed with his way of thinking but they were too scared to stop him. John Wilkes Booth thought he was doing the right thing he thought people would love and honor him for killing Lincoln. It’s interesting

Monday The least honorable character in Julius Caesar is Cassius. Cassius tries and destroy the life of Julius Caesar. He wants Brutus to think the people from Rome are concerned about Caesar's power. It's not honorable to dislike someone but cassius dislike Caesar and he also deeply resents being subservient to a tyrant, and there are indications that he would fight for his personal freedom under any tyrant. Cassius wants to remove Caesar from power. Cassius resorts to using his keen insight into human nature to deceive Brutus by means of a long and passionate argument. Cassius has some of his negative aspects. He has jealousy towards Caesar and that's probably why he dislikes him.

An honorable man has fairness and integrity in his actions, most fake honorability, only a select few have it. An honorable man wouldn’t kill another out of jealously. In the play The Tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar the leader of Rome, is assassinated by a group of conspirators. These conspirators are a group made up of the people in the senate, had their power taken away from the last dictator. Foolishly they take Ceasar as another dictator and tried to fix the problem before it even happened. However, they were wrong about poor Caesar, he was a honorable man that didn’t deserve to die because he was good to the citizens of Rome, he wasn’t in it for the power, and he supported them when needed.

The perspective of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare is not exactly historically correct. In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Shakespeare changes somethings about main characters Brutus, Antony, and Caesar. Not only did Shakespeare move around the personalities, he also shifted some events that happened in history. Lastly, some things were not exactly historically accurate due to the fact some items in the play were not created just yet in the Roman times. Though Shakespeare did an amazing job at getting some plots correct, some believe that he was careless or ignorant to the history of Julius Caesar.

This Essay is about me comparing myself to a character named Brutus from the story The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. This story is about Julius Caesar’s assassination and how his own people and friend betrays him. The Character I will be comparing myself to is Brutus. Brutus is a noble, loyal, and honorable Roman that seeks only the best for Rome and it’s people.

Justice is often found after a situation has occurred and more times than not it is seen through the eyes of revenge. Marc Antony, the main character, partakes in this reality by trying to get revenge on Julius Caesar’s, Marc Antony’s best friend, death. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare literally and symbolically delves into the choices that one makes when seeking revenge in the name of justice.

The least honorable character of Julius Caesar is Cassius because he was a conspirator. He killed Caesar because he didn’t like him. He didn’t like Caesar because Caesar didn’t like him. People actually didn’t like him. When Caesar was killed Brutus gave a speech. People thought that Brutus was the hero, but not Cassius. This why Cassius is the least honorable person in the play.

In 1599 the famous English writer, William Shakespeare, wrote the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. The story takes place toward the end of the Roman Republic in 44 BC in Ancient Rome. The play follows the words and actions of the Roman senators, plebeians and their emperor Julius Caesar. As the story begins, readers find out the many of the senators are not pleased with Caesar as a ruler of the Roman people. Two characters, Brutus and Cassius are especially passionate about killing Caesar to end his rule. Through discussing plans and creating alliances, the senators get their way and murder Caesar on the foreshadowed Ides of March. One question that comes up while reading the play is was Caesar’s assassination really justified by the murderers? Although he did show signs of hubris, or excessive pride, Caesar’s assassination by the conspirators was not justified because their reasons were based on theories and biased opinions, Caesar was a good man, and his murder was committed for the good of the people killing him and not for the good of Rome.

Julius Caesar, the great governor of ancient Roman, was killed in March 44 BC. This essay will state the way that conspirator justify their killing of Caesar and against their behavior, by focusing on the reason Caesar become a king, advantage of monarch and Caesar’s great achievement and admitted by the people of Roman. The main point of conspirator justify their murder was emphasizing that Caesar was a king. According to Appian (The civil wars ex. 119) “They ran shouting that they had destroyed a tyrant and a king.” The conspirator regarded Caesar as a tyrant because his position, dictator for life (Plutarch Caesar ex. 57) had no different with a king, and he was quite infatuated with bloody battles, thus, emphasizing it was rational to kill Caesar, a tyrant, for recovering the democracy of ancient Roman.