Why Is It Important To Create A Neutral Question

Have you ever wondered how we speak? How about why our communication is considered a language and other animal’s communication is not considered language? A wide range of beliefs exist on what defines language. Thus, by exploring the definition of language and lexicon, evaluating language’s key features, the four levels of language structure and processing, and the role of language in Cognitive Psychology, an understanding of what language is becomes clear. Let us begin by defining language and a term named lexicon.

Most questions of whether and how language shapes thought start with the simple observation that languages differ from one another. And a lot! Just look at the way people talk, they might say. Certainly, speakers of different languages must attend to strikingly different aspects of the world just so they can use their language properly.

1. Neutrality: State of being neutral, being unengaged between others, and taking no part in sides. Example, the mother of Tiffany had to remain neutral when deciding upon allowing her to go to her father’s house, the mother must keep her personal feelings from interfering with her decision.

Facts are statements that are indisputably true. Truthful statements are authentic because they are widely accepted to be accurate and fit reality. When answering the question “given access to the same facts , how is it possible that there can be disagreements between experts in a discipline?”, one must consider the definition of an expert. For the sake of this paper I am defining an expert as someone who excels in their field , and constantly evolves their knowledge as their field progresses. I believe that disagreements between experts when presented with the same facts, occur because of bias. Bias is a sway towards one side or view of a situation or statement. Therefore I ask , how does someone’s personal bias affect their interpretation

3. The value of the of the yes-or-no question allow you to decide if your position is defendable. It is also easier to make a thesis sentence, the question will help develop a specific view point. The yes-or no question will help

On the surface neutrality seems an obvious concept, however after further dissection it is shown to be a complex construct with many dimensions. Our convictions of what being ‘Neutral’ is will undeniably vary between each one of us. In colloquial use “neutral” can be synonymous with “unbiased”, where to be biased is to shown favouritism for a side or group. Could it be considered biased by attempting to remain neutral, thus showing favouritism to the perpetrators and not remaining neutral? This claim goes against the idea that all the is necessary for neutrality is inaction, instead suggesting if you are neutral in situations of injustice you have indirectly taken the sides of the oppressor and allowed the victims oppression, revealing one idea of why neutrality is impossible during conflict. Another idea of why neutrality is not an option can be

Personally, I truly believe that it is impossible to stay 100% neutral in any situation. Everybody forms a certain opinion on a situation. For example, you see a person deliberately kick over a trashcan on the street and you are with a couple buddies. You guys are all going to form an opinion whether its… “Wow, that guy is a disrespectful degenerate” or “maybe something happened in his personal that caused him emotional distress which filled him with the need to lash out”. But no one will just walk by and not think anything about the situation. I believe that the closest example of neutrality in society is the judges in the justice system. They have to sit down read a situation, hear both sides of a story and then form a verdict on the case

Located just five miles away from the city centre of Leeds, hotels and private accommodations near Tingley Leeds are bound to be where you want to be. Although it was once a rural location, Tingley has grown and developed into a booming, bustling metropolis with the amenities and attractions to match. The accommodations speak for themselves, and you can enjoy everything from a stay at an urban resort to a one bedroom apartment to a house. You will find that the junctions nearby provide easy access to many main attractions, such as the White Rose Shopping Centre. There is something for every traveler

In the article “Lost in Translation”, the author, Lera Boroditsky, maintains as her thesis that the languages we speak not only reflect or express our thoughts, but also shape the very thoughts we wish to express. Boroditsky begins the main section of her essay with the history of the issue of whether or not languages shape the way speakers think. Charlemagne was the first to think that languages do in fact shape the mindset of speaker, but Noam Chomsky rebutted this idea with his thought that languages do not differ much from each other, thus in turn proposing that linguistic differences do not cause a difference in thinking. Now with scientists

The claim, humans are the only animal that can acquire language has been the subject of much debate as scientists have investigated language use by non-human species. Researchers have taught apes, monkeys, parrots and wild children with various systems of human-like communication. Thus, one might ask, what is human language? According to Ulla Hedeager, A universally accepted definition of language or the criteria for its use does not exist. This is one of the reasons for the disagreement among scientists about whether non-human species can use a language. In nature, researchers find numerous types of communication systems, several of which appear to be unique to their possessors, and one of them is the language of the human species. Basically, the purpose of communication is the preservation, growth, and development of the species (Smith and Miller 1968:265). The ability to exchange information is shared by all communication systems, and a number of non-human systems share some features of human language. The fundamental difference between human and non-human communication is that animals are believed to react instinctively, in a stereotyped and predictable way. Generally, human behavior is under the voluntary control,

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

So now with this knowledge, we can go further with this question. So why can’t neutral questions exist? Areas of knowledge establish a paradigm, and because of this it is possible that they make neutrality nonexistent. As stated earlier, as soon as a question is asked, the individual stops looking for knowledge in a non-leading way. The way a question is phrased often portrays the assumption that lies behind it. If an individual thinks deeply

“Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think about.” – Benjamin Lee Whorf

Open-ended questions allow for a greater variety of responses from participants but are difficult to analyze statistically because the data must be coded or reduced in some manner. Closed-ended questions are easy to analyze statistically, but they seriously limit the responses that participants can give. Many researchers prefer to use a Likert-type scale because it’s very easy to analyze statistically. (Jackson, 2009, p. 89)

Knowledge can be accepted or refuted, hence what determines accepted knowledge? I believe ‘accepted knowledge’ is that which has been tested whereby sufficient evidence has been collected to support certain knowledge claims. However, it is important to consider times when knowledge has been refuted. Despite strong belief that we possess objective facts, through research and technological progresses, such facts become re-interpreted in light of new evidence and discoveries. Personally, discarded knowledge refers to theories or laws being dismissed as new-found information proves more accurate. However, knowledge can also be amended as it is evolves. Knowledge is often discarded or amended due to technological progresses or changing social trends. Taking both a natural and a human science in IB, I feel that knowledge is more readily discarded in the natural sciences whereas in the human sciences knowledge is amended as certain theories evolve. This suggests that knowledge is not static hence leading to the main knowledge issue which will be explored: “To what extent is knowledge within the human and natural sciences provisional?