Preventive Patrol Essay

I believe if the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment was conducted today different results would be revealed due to the fact that police strategies and tactics have changed over the years in response to changes in society, public pressures, aren research. Police executives must continually reassess their organizational technology and make adjustments to improve the attainment of the goals of protecting life and property and maintaining order. Today, the knowledge base related to what works in policing is much farther along in it development than even a decade ago, making it possible for police executives to strive toward the objective of evidence-based policing (Cordner, 2016). Moreover, evidence-based policing does not replace

While I do believe that reactive policing can have preventative effects, they are often limited when compared to that of proactive policing. There are certain situations where a reactive officer can be effective and help prevent future criminal activity in an area. However, the steps taken by a proactive officer can largely improve upon the effectiveness in

The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment was a landmark experiment carried out between 1972 and 1973 by the Kansas City Police Department of Kansas City, Missouri. It was designed to test the assumption that the presence (or potential presence) of police officers in marked cars reduced the likelihood of a crime being committed. It was the first study to demonstrate that research into the effectiveness of different policing styles could be carried out responsibly and safely. The Kansas City Police Department drew the conclusion that routine preventive patrol in marked police cars has little value in preventing crime or making citizens feel safe and that resources normally allocated to these activities could safely be allocated elsewhere. A significant factor realized was that crime prevention was more highly dependent on the willingness of citizens to report suspicious and/or criminal behavior to Police than the levels or types of patrol.

Since the 70’s police departments like Spokane Washington, I believe have proved that police visibility or presence in the community along with transparency working hand in hand with the community, have had a positive effect on preventing crime and providing communities with a sense of security (The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. (n.d.).

Community Policing took a different perspective on crime than August Vollmer. It shows that even though police officers are trained and respond to crimes on time, it doesn’t effect the crime rates. In the past foot-patrol was in place but it quickly failed due to poor management and not enough funds for the program (Bohm & Haley, 2014, Pg. 147). Community Policing was an idea to form a bond between the police and the citizens. If the police paid more attention to the minor problems in

The design of the Kanas City Preventative Patrol Experiment was to test the assumption that marked police units patrolling the streets can prevent individuals from committing crimes. Areas of the city were assigned either- no routine patrols the proper level of patrols and substantially increased patrols. “The concept of preventive patrol postulated the "self-evident truth" that the mere presence of the police or reasonable potential for their presence would deter criminals from committing offenses in the immediate geographic area of the patrol” (Deployment by analysis, 2000).

Police Academy and policing are some of the most controversial things in today 's world. This particularly pertains to our society, in which it seems that there is a different incident involving the police every week. It is extremely controversial, the media uses its power of manipulation to “expose” the police often abusing their power. This is leading to a division of our nation. There is a large clash of who 's to blame in this situation, we can even see this in class based on the various opinions of my fellow students.Some of my classmates and many others blame things like police academy, methods of policing, and the cultural separation between police and the community. I interviewed somebody who lived through both. He was in the police force for 21 years and continued on to teach and direct police academy for 25 years.

Have you ever been pulled over by a police officer? It is a nerve-wracking incident where you question what you were doing. Why were you pulled over? Was it due to speeding, or failing to obey basic laws of the road? Or, is it something else, like your race, appearance, or other reasons that should not result in a traffic stop? On average, an individual of color is thirty-one percent more likely to be pulled over by a police officer compared to a white individual. Black individuals are also about twenty-three percent more likely to pulled over than a Hispanic individual (Ingraham). By these statistics from 2011, it is reasonable not only to conclude but also infer that police specifically target black individuals. Think about it, many police-related incidents broadcasted on a news channel involves a police officer pulling over a black individual for a traffic violation, and the incident escalating from there. Even though different people drive differently, police target black individuals when it comes to traffic violations. Police are more likely to pull over a black individual and search their vehicle than any other race. Racial profiling being performed by police is an easy subject to have a viewpoint on but is not discussed enough.

The integrated patrol strategy brings a community-oriented concept of supervising into play, which law-breaking prevention and reduction efforts are functional on a broader scale, rather than concentrating specifically on a group of people within a particular location. The integrated patrol strategy, also calls for more improved fact-finding processes and data distribution between organizations to help in effective solutions to resolving crimes and chase tendencies and configurations, as well as, the potential to toughen contacts between agencies at all levels. Paralleled to the traditional enforcement strategy which reacted to crime after the fact, and only relating different emphases to certain situations,

In 1972- 73 the Kansas City police department came up with a Preventative Patrol experiment to test the effects of routine preventative patrol. (Cordner, 2016). Although it didn't prevent the need for preventative patrol, it did allow for alternative patrol strategies and tactics. The overall findings of the experiment were that officers patrolling in marked police cars do not appear to affect the level of crime in an area. It also did not help the public's feelings of security. (Temple University, unknown). The experiment showed that the police can manipulate and test patrol and deployment strategies and patrol resources without manipulating the public. (Temple University, unknown). The study that was administered by the Kansas City Police

Having officers foot patrolling make residents feel safer and it improves the attitudes they have towards police officers. Bicycle patrolling also make police officers more accessible to the public. This allows police officers to interact more with the public rather than being inside the car and only getting out when they must stop someone or when they are being called to a certain location. This increases trust in the police. When people trust in the police they open up, this will solve more cases and people won’t be afraid to speak out on something that happened in their neighborhood. Body worn cameras will also build community trust and relationships among police officers. Police officers duties is to protect the citizens and it is not to make citizens scared of

Second, some communities have neighborhood watch, were you always have someone watching the neighborhood and report to the police and sometimes surveillance cameras which have proven to reduce criminalization. The last and most important approach to crime prevention to me is community policing. Community policing doesn’t just deter crimes but it gives the community special connection with the police officer and the police department. This trusting relationship will in turn be helpful to the police officer because he practically know everyone in the community and the community will be more open to helping the police. The world is constantly changing, we have to change the way we do things so we can keep up with the world, if not we will only be moving

I believe that our community policing is more effective in the U.S. than those internationally for the reason that many other countries don’t have the resources in order to have officers get out in the community if it doesn’t involve an actual crime being committed. Many countries lack in funding to even have officers patrol their communities, and for that they have to send in other officers from neighboring areas (Hanwell, 2001). International policing has the same concept of ours, but conduct patrolling their way. Most of the time it is the old fashion way by looking for criminal activity, or waiting for a crime to be called in. They don’t necessarily have officers just out walking around or interacting with police officers. Plus, many citizens

This method of crime prevention gave way to the idea that it was better to be proactive than wait until after a crime has been committed. The strategy of using preventative patrol was how law enforcement eventually achieved deterrence.

Traditional policing models had very little input from the community they were supposed to serve; the shift of the officer tended to be quite repetitive in nature. Traditional policing was reporting to work, loading up in the patrol car, driving around for hours awaiting a call for service needed and then filing a report or arresting an alleged criminal. Typically just waiting for a call that a crime had possibly occurred is wholly reactive to crime control. That is a gritty summation of traditional policing which was the norm for police departments for many decades. Community policing is considered more proactive than traditional policing; and at its’ core, community policing should be an interactive collaboration of all