Is The Amendment Number 9 Assisted Suicide?

It is said that helping somebody who wants to die in a peaceful, painless way should be legal. Choosing how we die is a basic human freedom and if an individual's quality of life is deteriorating, due to a terminal disease such as cancer, they should have the right to stop their suffering via physician assisted suicide. It might be the case that the drugs for assisted suicide are far less expensive than the cost of their current medical care. This allows the government to save money as well as the lift the financial burden from the family of patients who are suffering from serious illness. Some people say that physician assisted suicide decreases the value of human life, but this isn't the case as it actually helps those who are terminal retain their dignity and choose their own death.

The word suicide gives many people negative feelings and is a socially taboo subject. However, suicide might be beneficial to terminally ill patients. Physician- assisted suicide has been one of the most controversial modern topics. Many wonder if it is morally correct to put a terminally ill patient out of their misery. Physicians should be able to meet the requests of their terminally ill patients. Unfortunately, a physician can be doing more harm by keeping someone alive instead of letting them die peacefully. For example, an assisted suicide can bring comfort to patients. These patients are in excruciating pain and will eventually perish. The government should not be involved in such a personal decision. A physician- assisted suicide comes with many benefits for the patient. If a person is terminally ill and wants a physician assisted suicide, then they should receive one.

Suicide is one person’s personal decision; physician-assisted suicide is a patient who is not capable of carrying the task out themselves asking a physician for access to lethal medication. What people may fail to see however is that the physician is not the only healthcare personnel involved; it may include, but is not limited to, a physician, nurse, and pharmacist. This may conflict with the healthcare worker’s own morals and there are cases in which the patient suffers from depression, or the patient is not receiving proper palliative care. Allowing physician-assisted suicide causes the physician to become entangled in an ethical and moral discrepancy and has too many other issues surrounding it for it to be legal.

Who gets to make the choice whether someone lives or dies? If a person has the right to live, they certainly should be able to make the choice to end their own life. The law protects each and everyone’s right to live, but when a person tries to kill themselves more than likely they will end up in a Psychiatric unit. Today we hear more and more about the debate of Physician assisted suicide and where this topic stands morally and ethically. Webster 's dictionary defines Physician assisted suicide as, suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician who is aware of the patient 's intent (Webster, 1977).

It is morally and constitutionally wrong for the state to take its citizens “right to die” away, when they have stayed in the legal boundaries. How could a law forbidding euthanasia possibly include every instance? It is just not possible for those who think it is morally wrong to understand what that patient is feeling, and it is most certainly not their life to choose either. This is why euthanasia should be legal, so citizens can have control of their own lives without being controlled by the

This risk should not be taken. Eventually others, like those with mental illness, could seek this treatment as well (Smith). They wouldn’t have the right to decide if they want to go through with euthanasia, so maybe their relative, who is tired of paying for treatment, could petition for euthanasia. If the state has custody they could also pursue the cheapest option. The physician’s ruthlessness could kill many people everywhere. If this is a possibility so much of the hope could disappear. Death is essentially giving up. “Murder and Suicide are both forms of killing,” States M. Scott Peck. Physician assisted suicide could lead to an even worse law.

Assisted suicide should be allowed in severe cases because there are often many cases of being severely ill. People should have the right to choose whether they want to continue with their lives or have it ended although others can argue otherwise. Patients would rather end their own lives rather than continue living in pain. It would be best if they were to get help and get it done in a place which the family will know rather than finding the body elsewhere. Many deaths occur daily regardless of assisted suicide or not and many debates going on about whether or not assisted suicide should even be an option. There is a place that separates relief from dying and killing so patients should not be considered killed with assisted suicide. Instead, they are relieved from the pain they were in. Patients do not want to suffer, they are the ones feeling all the pain in their systems, not anyone else. Assisted suicide should be an option because people choose whether they want to live or not, suicides are attempted regardless, and the bodies from suicides would

“Death smiles at us all, all a man can do is smile back” (Marcus Aurelius). Look in a mirror and imagine someone that has a horrible disease like breast cancer or AIDS and is suffering from all the pain that is killing them. People and terminally ill patients have the right to choose but they do not let patients choose when they want to end their lives when they have a terminal illness. The right to die and the right to choose has been in the Civil Rights for a while now and the other people that disagree would not let the people desire it. Terminally ill patients suffer from cancer and tumors, and they endure a lot of pain that they would kill for something to stop the pain. Death is no crime and does no harm to other people. They might feel mental pain, but no physical pain is inflicted. Assisted Suicide should be legal because it is a Civil Right, it can be for terminally ill patients, and it does not harm others.

While a doctor’s main goal is to save lives, physician assisted suicide should be legal I all fifty states because people should be able to determine when they are ready to end their life, but only in certain limited circumstances. Physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS, is suicide committed with the help of a physician. Another name for assisted suicide is euthanasia, which is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia is different from assisted suicide because the patient does not really have a say in what happens to them, therefore it is illegal in most countries. There are many different ways that the physician could assist the patient in committing suicide. In some cases the physician would provide lethal drugs so that the patient would pass away. In most cases a doctor or physician would take the patient off of life support. Although it is said that in some cases the patient can voluntarily stop eating and drinking is considered assisted suicide that seems to be more of a choice they make on their own and not so much with the help of a physician. Physician assisted suicide is currently legal in only five states; Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont and Washington. This law should be legal in all fifty states because it is unjust to the individuals who find their quality of live intolerable.

“The best preparation for death is a life well lived.” was said by Doctor Robert Liner. He had a close encounter with this issue, assisted suicide, which is when a physician can give a patient lethal drugs to choose to kill themself because they are in such agony. This is very controversial, whether people think it is right or wrong. When you hear the word suicide people become scared. Human nature is being scared of death because everyone has the instinct to survive. However, when someone is near death and they do not want to experience pain any longer why would someone make them do something they do not wish to do. So is assisted suicide morally okay to the doctor and the patient? Assisted suicide may seem wrong in many moral ways but through

People imply that assisted suicide is a way to end the pain and suffering in a way that is easy, it also should be up to the people and doctors.A lot of people imply that it should not be the doctor’s decision to end a patient’s life. The belief that assisted suicide is a horrible way to end a person’s life. It does not give them a choice to live. People who are in pain and are really sick they should have the choice whether they want to live or die, years go by and doctors have been prohibited from helping patients to take their own lives Doctors should have the right to decide if they have had enough. Easy Judge suggests “The right to die should be a fundamental freedom to each person (Gorsuch, 2008)”. By making assisted suicide illegal it

In the case of assisted suicide is not a justifiable act. “ People declined treatment that could have helped, and that many cited loneliness as an important reason for wanting to die” ( Benedict). People around the world should help people to live life. God put us in this world for a reason. He wants us to face the challenges in life so we can become stronger and leave the past alone. Which can take some time. “ A psychiatrist and bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health, looked at records of most of the cases of doctor assisted death for psychiatric distress from 2011 to mid-2014. In 37 to 66 cases, people had refused a recommended treatment that could have helped”(Benedict). However,

Those people who believe assisted suicide should be legal have a couple reasons as to why. One is because the person who wants death doesn’t want to endure the suffering caused by the terminal illness. Another reason is that people believe they fear the loss of their independence. Also they don’t want to become a burden to their family and friends and a fear of dying alone. People that are in great agony have the only hope of bringing it to a halt by this method. There are times when pain medication does not suffice (Smith Cheryl).

There are many factors to why a patient may request assisted suicide, the main one is that they want to die on their own terms. There are other variables that can play into effect but, it is the patient's choice and they are mentally competent these variables should not matter. “Abrahams states that people are living longer and are going to continue to, with this a significant rise of disease and disabilities will come. Then what follows this is the people who can not afford to make end of life care comfortable for themselves or their family. This can lead to pain and suffering. Assisted suicide is much more affordable and beneficial for patients and their families”(Abrahams). Many people do not consider the emotional effect this has on

As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations,