Is The Best Method For Development Sustainable Development Goals?

In 2015, the United Nations (UN) created a set of 17 goals, which they said were necessary to achieve to ensure worldwide human development. The final goal is that as countries strive to meet the goals, they become more developed, and as they develop, the standard of living for citizens increases too. It is important to strive for all the goals, but there are two that are necessary in accomplishing first and that will lead to achieving of the rest of the goals. These two goals are quality education and decent work and economic growth. These two are extremely important in accomplishing because the pave the way to reaching the goal of all 17 more obtainable.

In 2000, the UN General Assembly, in order to promote environmental sustainability, established global goals with specific targets that would address sustainable development, healthcare developments and reduce poverty. Those

It is necessary that each development goals need to monitor periodically and evaluate the outcomes and hindrance. Sometimes, it is difficult to achieve the development goals thatswhy individual has responsibility to review the development goals

Results – There has been a broad reduction in extreme poverty as the proportion of

Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger is one of the goals of Millennium Development Goals. The target of reducing extreme poverty rates by more than half has been attained five years ahead of 2015 deadline. Since the inceptions of MDG, the extreme poverty and hunger rate has reduced significantly in most developing regions. The statistics conducted in 2015 indicates that more than one billion have been lifted out of abject poverty from the time MDG was coined. As compared to 1990 when the majority of the people use to live below $1.25 a day in developing countries, the rate of poverty has dropped by more than 14

The Millennium Development Goals were established in September of 2000 and third world countries who demonstrated significant need for assistance in regards to basic human rights and quality of life were put at the forefront of the project. The effectiveness of many intergovernmental organizations and nongovernmental organizations on these countries were set to be analyzed in 2015. The eight major goals presented at the Millennium Summit were: Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty, Achieve Universal Primary Education, Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women, Reduce Child Mortality, Improve Maternal Health, Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases, Ensure Environmental Sustainability, and to Develop a Global Partnership for Development (UN Millennium Project). These goals were established as the basis for creating a sustainable and human rights oriented society.

The United Nations implemented eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These goals are: eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality and empower women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; global partnership for development. The goals were adopted by countries and development institutions across the nation, and the UN set a deadline to achieve the goals by 2015.

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are, eight goals put in place by the 191 UN states, the goals are set to be reached by the year 2015. Signed September of 2000, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2015, the United Millennium Declaration commits leaders of the world to combat literacy, hunger, environmental degradation, disease, and discrimination against women. Having specific targets and indicators, the MDGs are acquired from this Declaration. The eight goals are, to eradicate hunger and extreme poverty, achieve universal primary education, empower women and promote gender equality, lessen the deaths in children, improve the health of mothers, combat diseases for example HIV/AIDS and

On September 8, 2000, the United Nations Millennium Summit concluded with the adoption of the Millennium Declaration as a global vision for the future. In the following years, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) evolved in an effort to save the Declaration from slipping into oblivion. They created a momentum that brought the issue of development back on the international agenda, overcame aid fatigue and galvanized the public. With the MDGs’ expiration date of 2015 fast approaching, the world community is focusing on the development of a post-2015 agenda.

The UN development goals were set out on 25th of September 2015 to be achieved by 2030, originally 17 goals were set out to cover a wide range of issues such as environmental, political, social that were aimed to make changing sustainability internationally achievable.

Reforms are among the most important ideas to think of in the 21st century. They are a global phenomenon that has gathered pace in global economies. The 21st century is also unique in the developments that have taken place. These developments can partly be attributed to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that was a historic commitment made in 2000 (Enthoven & Minarik, 2012). The MDGs have gained widespread acceptance in rich and poor countries alike. The goals have been used to guide all development efforts and act as guidelines to measure the level of success in different countries (Enthoven & Minarik, 2012). With three months of the target year of 2015, evidence suggests that there is substantial progress.

My paper will look into the following research question: did the anti-poverty programs and activities of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) contribute in achieving Goal 1 of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which is to eradicate extreme hunger and poverty, in some South Asian and sub-Saharan African nations? Since NGOs play an active role in eradicating extreme poverty at the local and international level, I chose to look into the anti-poverty programs and strategies implemented by local and international NGOs to see if they have influenced countries to meet their MDGs. The reason I chose these two regions is because South Asia has shown the most dramatic change in reducing extreme poverty rates (52 percent to 17 percent), whereas Sub-Saharan Africa had the least percentage decline (57 percent to 41 percent) and more than 40 percent of the population continues to live in extreme poverty (MDG Report, 2015). There might be geographical, political, and other various reasons in such a stark difference between the two regions, but I wish to probe into how and if the anti-poverty programs of NGOs have made a difference in achieving the MDGs’ Goal 1 (hereinafter referred to as MDG1) in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. There are three sub-goals under Goal 1 of the MDGs: Target 1.A. is to reduce the proportion of people whose income is less than $1 a day into half between 1990 and 2015; Target 1.B. is to achieve full and productive employment and decent

At the start of the millennium, various United Nations (UN) partners came together to tackle some of the world’s deadliest and most pressing social and economic problems, and in doing so, established the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In the past 15 years, the MDGs have been evaluated and re-evaluated. This year the UN has declared a new set of 17 goals for the next 15 years called the Sustainable Development Goals. The first issue on both agendas is the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, a problem that is specifically significant for the entire continent of Africa.

There are many negative critiques on the goals outlining why the global goals are not complete and although I believe they are not attainable within 15 years, I would like to outline what we can do to best focus on the goals. The post 2015

Many of the targets for goal 14 are measurable, however not all. Some targets are open for interpretation, and lack a solid unit of measurement. For example targets 14.2, 14.3 14.6 and 14.a/c cannot be measured. It would be difficult to determine the strength of resilience, and an adverse impact must first be defined by a unit that can be measured.(14.2) Furthermore cooperation cannot be measured by any units (14.3), “appropriate treatment of a country” is vague (14.6), nor is there a unit scientific knowledge nor enhanced conservation (14.a/c). Otherwise the targets are generally quantifiable, such as pH of ocean water (14.3), number of fish in fish stocks, and exploited fish populations (14.4), percentage of area conserved, by square foot, (14.5), reduction of subsidies is a numeric value easily understood, as well as economic benefit (14.6,14.7), percentage of artisanal fisheries (14.b).