Is The N.c.a.a Doing For Protect Academic Integrity?

Do student athletes make the most of their opportunity to obtain a post-secondary education? Do they have the same academic success as those students that are not athletes? Are student athletes just “dumb jocks?” The answers to these questions might surprise you. Much research has been done to dispel the myth that athletes going to college are only there to play sports with little regard to their education. Programs have been created to assure that colleges and universities hold athletes to the same standards as the everyday student. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has decided that the “magic number” to put the “student” back into “student-athlete” is 925 (Hamilton).

In his article “The Shame of College Sports,” Taylor Branch (2011) describes how universities are focused on advancing and receiving money from major athletics and having star athletes, but how the universities are not caring for the “student athlete.” The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has made college sports into an unmerited business. However, as years progress more athletes are getting smart and are taking the NCAA to court. The more students that challenges the rules by the NCAA and take them to court, the secrets and undermining values of the NCAA come out and the closer the NCAA comes to an end.

The competitive athletics programs of member institutions are designed to be a vital part of the educational system. A basic purpose of this Association is to maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body and, by so doing, retain a clear line of demarcation between intercollegiate athletics and professional sports (NCAA, 2011).

It’s shaping up to be a trying year for the NCAA as two former athletes have come forward in the past week and filed a class action lawsuit against them for “academic fraud in its members schools’ athletic programs.” While some think this couldn’t get worse, from the numerous unacknowledged complaints from over the last century, a large number of the student athletes on the receiving end of less than stellar educations were African-American student athletes—especially in revenue-producing sports like basketball and football.

In today’s society when it comes to college athletics everything is a competition. Whether it’s between the athletics themselves or which school has the best uniforms universities will find any reason to compete. They even found a way to make the newly passed rule in the NCAA a contest. In the New York Times article, “N.C.A.A. Ensures Athletes Will Get All They Can Eat”, published on April 24, 2014, Zach Schonbrun discusses what actions universities are taking to make sure their athletes are feed properly and how they will do anything to make sure they get the best. Schonbrun has an informative structure to his article. He begins it by giving his readers just enough information on the newly passed rule to get his readers interested. Then he goes into explaining who is affected, what actions universities are taking, and why this has just now be passed. He achieves his purpose of informing his readers and giving them all the necessary information.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association is charged with the regulation of athletes, and all athletic programs in affiliated universities and colleges across the United States. The N.C.A.A. is the association charged with developing and implementing policies regarding athletics in colleges and universities. With such a role, the association is mandated to specify the minimum academic requirements for a student to participate in any sporting activity. The association claims that it aims at creating a balance between sport and education. The heart of the association 's mission is student-athlete success in classroom and on the field. N.C.A.A. comes up with policies that

In 2010, the United States Secretary of Education Mr. Arne Duncan demanded that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) clean-up their act due to the declining graduation rate for athletes, particularly African-American males. According to the Harper’s study, at 50 of the most prominent colleges, on the average, African-American males made-up approximately 2.8% of the undergraduate class overall (Harper 4). However, they made-up approximately 57.1% of the football players and approximately 64.3% of the basketball players (Harper 4) with an average completion rate of six-years (Harper 4). As a result, many college coaches and academic administrators started to encourage African-American male athlete-students to major in less demanding degree

It was apparent when Brian Bosworth, an Oklahoma University football player, wore a shirt on national TV coverage of the Orange Bowl declaring “National Communists Against Athletes”, with the words looking like the NCAA logo. Although this has been a battle cry for many years, in the last five years or so, it has gained national traction and become a synonymous chant with many across the nation, who desired sweeping reform. The organization was not originally designed to execute what it carries out, and needs to change, or give way to a new governing body for intercollegiate affairs. It is a political machine, that selectively prosecutes cases, and is biased on a variety of issues. It has no clear balance or accountability partner for its actions either. It is blatant that the only acceptable course of action is a systematic change in the system, from all sides. The solutions are simple. A thorough review from the top down is necessary, and accountability needs to be found between the member schools, and the actual organization. Once a harmonious balance is struck, issues may be resolved when they are a smaller issue than when they grow, and entangle themselves into other

In 1906, the NCAA was formed to protect student-athletes by incorporating a compliance approach to ethics which would ensure student-athletes are not being exploited or endangered by developing and enforcing rules that lay out three types of violations and their corresponding penalties in order to keep games fair and respectful of student-athlete rights. In today’s world of college football which has become more of a business, rather just a sport, that can bring in millions of dollars as well as thousands of college applications yearly to many universities, the NCAA is there to prevent unethical behavior by objectively setting and enforcing standards of conduct while encouraging universities to also set up their own systems of compliance.

Summary: Catherine Rampell, in her article “Grading College Athletes”, claims in her visual that college recruited athletes tend to have a lower GPA than non-athlete students. The authors reinforce their claim by conducting a study on the effect of participating in college athletics on the GPA’s of college students. The authors’ purpose is to analyze the relationship between college academics and athletics in order to explain the impact of athletics on academic focus and performance in school for athletes. The authors’ audience is the college students who are incorporated into the

in Miller). These bylaws are meant to protect the young athletes from exploitation, professionally and commercially, in the real world. Although, nowadays, intercollegiate athletics produce enormous profit for their schools, and the players still do not receive any of it, except through scholarships (Schneiders 232). According to Byers, athletes also cannot “be paid for any work with private sports camps related to their sport” (qtd. in Miller). To bind the athletes to these standards, a player must sign an N.C.A.A. student athlete form before ever becoming an official student-athlete. This form guarantees to the N.C.A.A. that their athletes have had the opportunity to read and understand the new rules that govern collegiate sports, versus the leniency of high school. Despite the strict approach, the association does take the financial need of their players into consideration by allowing schools to include room, board, and tuition in the money they are allowed to grant (Miller).

“Its time for our college athletes to be true students on campus, not athletes on athletic stipends with sports – not education – as their top priority and obligation… By eliminating the athletic scholarship, … we could de-professionalize college athletes, reestablish athletic departments as part of the educational institution, and be able to use the term student-athlete without snickering.” (Ralph Nader in League of Fans Proposes Eliminating Athletic Scholarships to Help Restore Integrity on College Campuses, 2011)

There has been amplified debate on the treatment, education, training of the college athlete. To avoid exploitation of athletes, “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), formed in 1905, set bylaws requiring college student-athletes to be amateurs in order to be eligible for intercollegiate athletics competition” (Schneider n.p.). Intercollegiate athletics have dramatically changed over the last several decades. Currently, intercollegiate athletics generate tremendous amounts of revenue, remarkably in football and basketball. College sports in America is a

The following Case Study is about the National Collegiate Athletic Association unethical act in the sport college league. How this league creates big amounts of money which is invest in all short of projects rather than take care of the student-athletes. The study case highlight the two main principles issue that the National Collegiate Athletic Association faces; the money how the student are not getting paid and the academic versus sport.

In the United States, approximately sixty percent of all high school students participate in school-sponsored sports, according to a 2015 report by Child Trends. Most high schools across the U.S. not only have school-sponsored sports, but have some type of eligibility requirement for their student athletes regarding their GPA and attendance at school. These are important policies because they ensure that student athletes are attending their classes, maintain their GPA, and their sports are not interfering with the students' academics. With such policies, student athletes that are performing well in their classes are deemed eligible to participate in various sports. However, student athletes who are not performing well academically are deemed ineligible and not allowed to participate in any sport until they bring their GPA or attendance levels up. This is very important and should be enforced because it teaches student athletes responsibility, the importance of their GPA, and prepares them for their futures. With the importance of such, students who fail to pass their classes should not be allowed to participate in school-sponsored sports until they are able to pass all of their classes.