Is The War On Terror Ethical?

In his writing, he stated that war is intrinsically vast, communal (or political) and violent. It is an actual, widespread and deliberate armed conflict between political communities, motivated by a sharp disagreement over governance” (p.135)

But war is not needed to improve and increase human rights in other nations. Even with out war there are still nations and people without human rights; it just needs to be noticed.

From an excerpt on civil disobedience by Mohandas K. Ghandi, it states, “... What comes to it, is defeat, not victory. And if, perchance, either our act of our purpose was ill conceived, it brings disaster to both belligerents.” In Gandhi’s speech he explains how going to war doesn't solve disagreements in the best way. As no matter whether someone wins or loses, everyone would still lose. By placing a countries people in war to fight and sacrifice their lives, they as well as the defeated, lose in the name of war. Gandhi tries to prove this to people by using acts of civil disobedience, or without acts of violence. Because, if he tries to fight he has no greater effect of stopping the war, as he is helping to start

As Cierco(Source A) said to his son, “physical force… is characteristic of man.” Peace may last for some time, but differing views on complicated issues means fighting for what you believe is right. For example, the Cold War clearly supports this message because the US strongly believed in democratic values and they were fighting against the Soviet Union who desired to spread communism. The Cold War strengthened US politically because they maintained their democratic values and contained communism by helping out countries that were devastated after World War II. The US was strictly against communism because it harmed their democratic views and because this could not be solved through discussion, the Cold War was bound to happen. The US and USSR wanted to gain more allies through the spread of their own ideologies but, the Soviet Union clearly had a negative intent of spreading their power on the world. The US policy of containment weakened the Soviet Union because they were not able to spread communism and therefore led to the fall of their empire. This shows that war can either strengthen countries or weaken countries who abuse their use of power. Action must be taken against countries who have a negative purpose of spreading their power and if not resolved through discussion, this means going to

War leads to oppression and leaves negative implications on all people and societies by impacting the poor, women, children, and nations as a whole. "War is a state of violent conflict between one or more groups" (Rasenberger 3). Rasenberger defines war as a state of conflict between one group within itself or several groups in combat with each other, what is not mentioned are the after-effects of war. War itself leads to many civilian and military deaths, an estimated 1.5-3.8 million people died during the Vietnam War and an approximate 500,000 people died in the Iraq war. The biggest tragedy of War is that it always results in fatality, but another key, negative, factor to understand is that after the War many adverse implications arise. Post-war ramifications in the nation fall upon the poor, women, and children, making them weaker and less motivated leading to the downfall of a society. Regardless if a nation wins or is defeated in war they have to deal with consequences of war and find solutions to the impacted people and society. It is essential to understand that there is never a true victor in war because regardless of the outcome, fatality and a fall of morale within society on both sides are inevitable. War has often been the solution to situations that required force or violence, but in recent times this has

It is vital to attempt to take alternate routes before deciding such a drastic measure as conflict. Doing so will save lives, supplies, and figuratively speaking, morale of the country as a whole. Even so, the natures of war can happen without it being existing, such as feelings of hostility or lack of peace. Just like a human's emotions and temperament, war's nature can be quick, ruthless, and detrimental to one's goals, if no military strategy or planning is put in place to secure victory. But no matter how much planning and precision goes into effect, it is not possible to avoid one main factor of war's nature; chance. It can affect all levels of combat and can be unpredictable in most situations. The leader's ability to adapt to new problems and quick thinking can save a strategy that's been eradicated due to chance or surprise, greatly reducing the likelihood of loss of troops or

The conflict of war and its effects have been debated throughout history. Some argue that there are other peaceful alternatives besides war that would lead to a better outcome, but in reality this is not the case. War is a natural part of human interactions, and even though it brings death and destruction, war will not cease to exist. Wars are the human way of getting one group to look superior than the other. The idea of a passive approach is ideal, but it is almost nearly impossible and may not always lead to the same outcome as if a war had taken place.

The history of the human race can be summed up as self destructive. Centuries of countless war, uprisings, and oppression has marked history as a repeating cycle of hate and violence. The population today is divided amongst issues and the government is torn between what decide. The people want change from their government about critical issues, but change is not always guaranteed to be given. With change comes opposition and opposition only gives rise to violence.

To be able to understand this topic any further, let's go into detail about certain that happened in the past that may have led to the United States War on Terror. On September 11, 2001, as most people may all know it, it was an agonizing day of sadness, destruction, and a huge turning point that not only brought America together but it also caused a great change in history. On September 11, 2001 around 8:45am, on a clear Tuesday morning, a hijacked American Airline with 300 gallons of jet fuel crashed into the North tower of the World Trade Center in New York. The impact of the plane crash left a large burning hole near the 80th floor of the 110- story skyscraper. It instantly killed hundreds of people as well as hundreds of others whom were

We see in history a common theme; history is told by the victor. The aggressor enters the scene; takes control of the group who was there before, and oppresses them. Typically associated with stealing wealth, pillaging, and plundering. Some things have changed though these events still happen today. However in today’s society oppression is strongly viewed as distasteful. We seem to think we have grown more accepting of even our own citizens. All they ask is for reparations.

There are moments in our history where the citizens of the world stand up and for their beliefs, their honor, and themselves. They come together to reform the existing government that is holding them back from achieving their desired lifestyle. When this occurs, most likely, war is inevitable to follow. When war comes to a country, death and destruction is destined. Leaders and rules change, but the pride of its citizens prevails and becomes

For all of history there has existed the struggle between the strong and the weak. The establishment of government gives the power to a particular group to decide the amount of freedom the majority is allowed, however, though not ideal it provides necessary order. The benefits of security that limitations on freedom provides must be balanced with the individual's pursuit of happiness for citizens to be content. To prevent the governed majority from destabilizing the rulers and seeking power, the government will oppress political and personal freedom of thought. In result, the majority will live under the illusion of contentment and not wish to revolt; those enlightened to the idea that the government should be ruled by the governed, would associate happiness only with ignorance and consequently seek freedom.

War should not be used just as an excuse to settle arguments. My claims are, firstly, war involves mass killings and is unethical. Secondly, war destroys economies. Thirdly, war has a negative impact and ruins the lives of children. Lastly, war can only be justified when it can be proven to be a necessity.

After the events of September 11, 2001, the United States had a unique dilemma. America was engaged in what would be called a “War on Terror”. This new conflict was unlike any in American history. Previously, in the context of war the United States had always fought a nation or group that had defined boundaries as to where they resided. This new conflict went away from these rules of the past. Terrorist groups were not bound to a region, but were instead united by an ideal. September 11 marked the first time in which terrorism would rise to the forefront of the nation’s agenda. This emergent wave of conflict required a different strategy than the those of the past because of the unorthodox nature of the opponent. One of the major innovations fostered by the “War on Terror” was the expansion of torture. The dramatic rise in terrorism sparked the unethical advancement of interrogation techniques in order to more effectively acquire information. The emergence of the “War on Terror” required government officials acquire intelligence in a new way thus spawning the emergence of “enhanced interrogation” methods, however, the morality of these techniques would come into question as they were revealed to the public.

“Only the dead have seen the end of war.”- Plato. Plato was a philosopher in Classical Greece and the founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. War is nothing new, throughout history we have experienced over hundreds of wars with more in the future. For every war requires soldiers to fight for what they believe in. In most cases the soldiers are on a mission to fight the enemy for their country. Fighting is common between individuals because conflict is inevitable. It can try to be avoided, but as a nation, we can never eliminate it.The way to manage conflict and reduce the damage is less hate and more love. The overall goal of the soldiers is to fight for the interest of the country which is not peace but power. The power is sent to bring peace, once everyone is continent peace will appear. Conflict exists because there is always someone to fight, whether that be in gang or drug wars, or more importantly with politics and war between nations. There will always be a fight to win what someone wants, which can flare war.