Is There An Enforceable Contract Between Kelvin And Brie On Kelvin 's First Email? Essay

There is consideration present here since according to the ‘Doctrine of Consideration, ' promises will legally enforceable if you ‘ask for something in return for ' something else. Here, Ken asks for £12,000 in return for his work to build Jack 's conservatory. Therefore, when Jack ‘accordingly contacts Ken to say that he will be employing him to do the building work, ' Jack has accepted Ken 's offer, and both parties have entered into a legally binding contract. Jack 's statement qualifies as an acceptance since there is correspondence between the two parties, whereby both the offer and acceptance are on the same terms; there is nexus, where the acceptance is in response to the offer; and finally, there is communication on both parts. Moreover, when Jack states that he will accept the ‘most competitive ' tender, he could argue that the recommendation from ‘Barnie, ' his ‘neighbour ' who expresses that ‘Ken is an excellent builder ' constitutes Jack 's meaning of the ‘most competitive. ' However, this is not relevant unless Bob wishes to argue in court that Jack 's proposal was indeed an invitation to tender, which constitutes an offer, as according to Harvela.

Contracts become legally binding when an offer has been made and accepted by the employee: employees are expected to read and sign the contract to say that they agree with the terms outlined in the contract. It is the employee's right to receive a written contract within two months of employment. Contracts are provided for permanent,

Promisee must incur a detriment or confer a benefit on the promisor (Currie v Misa).

The first element of a contract is the agreement, which is defined as including an offer and acceptance of the offer. The offer must include an intention to be bound by the agreement, reasonable terms, and communication (Kubasek, 2012p. 324). In the verbal discussion between Sam and the store manager, there appears to be an attempt to form a bilateral contract because the store has promised exclusivity to the dog barking device, and Sam has offered to deliver 1,000 units. The verbal interaction shows an intention and communication of agreement to the contract. However, the terms are not fully defined in this agreement. Specifically, the

A contract is an agreement that creates obligations that are enforceable by the law. A contract can either be written or spoken. There are elements to a contract that make it valid and binding. This is defined as a clear manifestation of willingness to enter an agreement made by another person with full understanding that their assent to the bargain is an invitation and is concluded. As to whether there was an offer in this case, yes there is an offer. When the salesman offered the buyers time for a test drive and they finally chose and agreed to buy the blue car it was a clear offer.

The parties did have a contract for exclusive negotiation rights as stated in the case scenario. Big Time Toymaker (BTT) paid Chou $25,000 for a 90-day period of exclusivity, thus prohibiting Chou from soliciting or entertaining offers from other parties. The agreement stipulated that unless it was written no distribution contract existed. Prior to the 90-days elapsing, the parties reached an oral agreement and BTT sent Chou an e-mail titled “Strat Deal” covering the key terms of the distribution agreement reaffirming the oral agreement. This e-mail does not constitute a contract for several reasons. First, this was part of the negotiation process and Chou failed to draft the contract to “memorialize" the

1. Jerry sent a letter containing an offer to sell his mountain bike to Bill for $300.  This letter was sent on Oct. 1 and it was received on Oct. 4.  On Oct. 5 Bill sent a letter to Jerry accepting the offer.  But then Bill changed his mind; on Oct 6 Bill sent a message by personal messenger to Jerry, rejecting Jerry’s offer.  The messenger delivered the rejection and it was received by Jerry on Oct. 7.  The letter containing Bill’s acceptance was received on Oct. 8.  Based on the above, has a contract been formed for the sale of the mountain bike?

I believe that there were two contracts made in this scenario. The first one was the verbal contract that sated that the stipulations of price and the fact that there needed to be a written contract before distributing the product. The email, since it was in writing can also count as a written contract; both parties had knowledge that there would be some sort of written agreement. Chou was in the right to think that the email stating the key terms and agreements counts as a contract.

The contract is a legally-enforceable promise or a set of promises. The four elements of the contract are 1) the agreement, 2) the consideration, 3) contractual capability, and 4) lawful object (Cheeseman, 2015, p. 188). These elements are required to exist for a contract between Sam and the chain store to be valid. The first element of the contract is the agreement which is a combination of the offer and an acceptance which both need to exist. The agreement between Sam and the chain store exists because Sam had verbally agreed to send 1,000 units to the chain store, as per conversation with the store manager. The second element of the valid contract is the consideration which could exist if both parties, Sam and the chain store, had agreed

In order for a contract to be considered valid four elements must be present, 1) Agreement 2) consideration 3) contractual capacity and 4) legal object (Kubasek, N. 2011 pgs. 304/305).. In Sam’s case of his invention, the first element, Agreement, certainly exists. Sam had made a verbal “offer” to deliver one thousand units to the chain store, and the stores letter to Sam demanding delivery of the product can be considered an acceptance of his offer. The second element of a contract is the consideration or the bargained for exchange under the contract (Kubasek, N. 2011 pg. 343). While one might assume that in this situation each party had agreed to exchange something for others services, there is no evidence

The offer had been agreed upon from both parties is important. The acceptance of an offer cannot alter the terms of the specified in the offer. “An offeree accepts by saying or doing something that a reasonable person would understand to mean that he definitely wants to take the offer.” (Beatty, 2016) Once the buyers or offeree came to an

“A contract is a legally enforceable agreement” that” comes into existence from the voluntary assent of two or more individuals to enter into a legally binding agreement” (Rogers, 2012). Under common law, they have an express contract, “Since a contract comes into existence as soon as the offeror’s offer is accepted by the offerer” (Rogers, 2012). So basically a “a contract is formed when an offer by one party is accepted by the other party” and that “offer need not be made to a

for it to qualify as a proper contract in the eyes of the law: offer

In BROGDEN v METROPOLITAN RAIL CO it was held the railway company had accepted by placing orders since the amendment of the document, and in TRENTHAM LTD v ARCHITAL LUXFER the court used the 'reasonable man' to identify whether or not there has been acceptance. Both cases seemed to have reasonable outcomes; therefore the courts had been provided with satisfactory rules to help them reach a appropriate verdict. There are various different rules regarding acceptance. There must be a communication of acceptance from the offeree to the offeror. The case of YATES BUILDING v PULLEYN deals whether there had been a prescribed acceptance or not. It was held that there was no practical difference to the offeror therefore the acceptance method was binding. However in the case of ENTORES LTD v MILES FAR EAST CORPORATION there was no prescribed acceptance, yet it was held that the contract was formed in England as that was there acceptance had been received by telex. Other rules that can be used to decide whether there has been acceptance include a waiver of communication of acceptance; silence, which isn't a valid acceptance; ignorance, generally there isn't a binding contract; and acceptance via post using the postal rule. The postal rule can often be misused, as it states that a contract has been formed as

ANSWERS TO QUESTION 1 OF CONTRACTS EXAM Exam 5003 – AThe letter sent by B was an offer. An offer may be defined as a communication, having sufficient definiteness to eliminate the need for further negotiation, and creating the impression of manifest intent to enter into a K. An offer may be made to the general public, as in a mass mailing or advertisement, or to an individual. The letter was sufficiently definite. It provided the description of the product, a price, and a quantity. The quantity, while not particular, first created the impression of a great many pieces available. Second, it operated as an offer for a requirement K by UCC 2306. Such a requirement K need not be explicit in the quantity; it is