Urban Sprawl Essay

13. Urban Sprawl: Urban sprawl refers to migration of population from high density urban areas to low density rural areas which results in spreading of city over more and more rural land. Urban sprawl results in land degradation, increased traffic, environmental issues and health issues. The ever growing demand of land displaces natural environment consisting of flora and fauna instead of being replaced.

Rapid urbanisation has caused a variety of problems, including transport congestion, lack of sufficient homes and living conditions, sanitary and health care issues, and crime. For all these problems, city planners have attempted potential solutions, each with varying degrees of success. Cities including London, Manila and Mumbai have several of the aforementioned problems, and have each tried their own potential solutions. This essay will discuss how successful these schemes have been in resolving these issues.

How successful has the regeneration of urban areas been given the variety of ways it has been undertaken (40 marks)

There are many who suggest the solution to the decline of the suburbs is to urbanize the area by densifying and overall making the suburbs more similar to a city. Laura Vaughan argues that the development of a spatial layout similar to that of a city would help the suburbs to become more efficient socially and economically. However, this approach directly contrasts the purpose of the suburbs, which was originally meant to provide a private, quiet environment for single family homes away from loud and busy city life. In his book, “Sprawl: A Compact History,” Robert Bruegmann explains that suburbia is not a bad thing but possesses “benefits that urban planners fail to recognize” and is a natural process of the growth of urbanism. While the suburban landscape does possess much potential, those who support the continued existence of the suburbs as they exist are naive and fail to recognize the environmental, social, and economical impact that the suburbs impose. The suburbs possess many social and political issues that need to be addressed. There is no doubt that there is massive potential in the suburban

Urban sprawl was a major problem and had many negative effects. "Suburban sprawl, “called urban sprawl was a result of overpopulation. Sprawl occurred when cities spread outward. Forests and farmland were being destroyed to create new housing subdivisions, shopping centers, offices, parking areas, civic institutions and roadways. State governments built highways and roads to serve all the new commuters moving in and out of the city. Developers chose to build on less expensive land farther away from the urban core. Land prices were lower and housing in these developments was more affordable. Some people chose a longer commute in exchange for more comfortable, low-priced housing. The sprawl was a chronological process that devastated the land and life of the American people. This problem described here continues to be a problem. And many people are unaware that urban sprawl continues to be a problem. Friendly neighborhoods, traditional pedestrian have fallen victim to this problem. Environmental activists claimed that urban sprawl, was a substantial environmental threat. But activists concerned about sprawl should concentrate on existing government policies that encourage suburban development and prevent greater redevelopment of urban areas.

In Robert Bruegmann article “How Sprawl Got a Bad Name,” he is the odd man out and is for sprawling. One of his reasons throughout is that all the architectures plan for preventing the problem has failed. Bruegmann shows his argument that the economy has these set of expectations for today’s society. The citizens are not really thinking realistically when it comes to those modern expectations. He backs up his point by stating a big crisis of traffic in Los Angeles and how it is not the congestion it is that the programs sit in place are outdated. One of the more convincing reasons of why Bruegmann is supporting sprawl is “that growing numbers of people have discovered that it is the surest way to obtain the rich, satisfying

Urbanization and Industrialization brought millions of people to growing cities, these growing cities were ill equipped to deal with growing population rate. While some might argue that Industrialization had primarily positive consequences for society because of a surplus of job opportunities, faster production, and more amenities, it was actually a negative thing for society. Industrialization’s negative effects were angersome working conditions, poor quality of life, and child labor.

Generally, well-planned sprawl or smart growth is a good thing and will result in fewer acres of rural land being covered by urban development. Environmentalists for example are interested in the urban planning aspects of anti-sprawl work because they can reduce the amount of energy used and pollution produced by residents. Also better planned sprawl is likely to keep residents happier and less likely to decide later to move even farther beyond the urban centers. The main issue of this paper is that the urban expansion of rural land loss is also significant to the quality of life of urban dwellers. The larger the urban area, the more difficult it will be for the average resident to reach the open spaces beyond the urban perimeter. The increase in urban distances can also effect

Urban sprawl is a phenomenon in growing cities typified by continual growth of the urban area in a radial pattern, with the development of low density housing typically on agricultural or environmentally sensitive lands. Urban sprawl typically provides the quarter acre block or detached housing. However, this type of development tends to impact on food basins

To reduce urban sprawl, the Places to Grow Act (2005) encourages infill and intensification in areas with the necessary infrastructure to support growth. The established neighbourhoods within

Urbanization or urban sprawl refers to migration of people from urban cities to low density rural areas. This movement of people provided incentives for new development on undeveloped land. Some of the benefits of urban sprawl include new road construction, better schools, more affordable housing, larger park spaces, and smaller communities, in addition to economic growth. Even though there are many benefits of development, there are as well some drawbacks. The need for new roads, housing, and business infrastructure creates a fragmentation in land structure obstructing the movement of wild animals separating their migration areas and blocking their feeding grounds. The new road construction directly affects land conversion rates and loss

What is beyond the financial cost for both the poor and the middle class is the social cost. The sprawl causes social decline. One of problem that authors address out is the difficulty of forming a community. Public space for social activity is the key, where people can interact with each other in an equal way. Unfortunately, this is what a sprawl fail to provide. Unlike traditional community which has a clear city/town center, sprawl doesn’t have these and many of them are still trying to create them. Even if some suburbia has a city center, the public area is usually not walkable, and people still rely on vehicle to get there. If a comfortable public zone is not created, the segregation based on race, ages, beliefs, would never go

Imagine waking up in your apartment and walking down the street to your job. Later in the day, you take a lunch break, and you walk from your office to your favorite restaurant a few blocks down. Eventually, you get off work, and you head to the local grocery store just three doors down from your apartment. You pick up dinner, and you plan a nice relaxing night in your apartment. The night passes, and you do it all over again the next day. For a small percentage of America, this is a realty. However, for many Americans, this is unprecedented. Since the 1940’s, the majority of the U.S. cities and towns have moved to drivable sub-urban zoning. Meaning housing districts are usually more than a few miles from work, the closest restaurant, or grocery store. This results in driving almost everywhere. Although drivable sub-urbanism is convenient, it has negative impacts on the environment. Therefore, the United States must make the conversion back to walkable urbanism zoning because drivable sub-urbanism is having detrimental effects on our environment’s land, air, water, and climate.

An emerging issue is that of urban sprawl. While some aspects of urban sprawl has been seen since ancient times, this phenomenon has started gaining the most momentum in the past century, aided by the advancement of technology, especially with the rise of mass produced automobiles, houses and highway systems. Many people unknowingly contribute to this environmental problem, as is the nature of it. Urban sprawl deals with the growth of the suburbs, the area between the urban and rural areas of a city. Most of America’s largest cities and states, in terms of population, are prime examples of urban sprawl. Opponents of urban sprawl usually cite the government as a major cause of sprawl. The government may be a major catalyst of

According to Withgott and Brennan (2007), people are now live at a turning point. Beginning about the year 2007, for the first time in the human history, more people will live in the urban areas than in rural areas. The development of social diversity is one of the principal objectives of urban regeneration. It aims at attracting new inhabitants in degraded districts but also preventing their inhabitants to leave them as soon as the situation has improved.