It is not unheard of to see workers protesting against the executives of their company; whether it is for better working conditions, a higher salary, or new policies that they don’t agree with. In fact, throughout American history, specifically with beginning with the Industrial Revolution, employees have protested for their rights to be acknowledged and for their voices to be heard. However, the Market Basket protest that took place during the summer of 2014 is an exception to this norm. Not unlike traditional protests, Market Basket employees left the New England grocery stores vacant with only a few essential employees remained to keep the stores opened for their beloved customers. What sets the Market Basket protest apart from previous …show more content…
Another lawsuit filed in 2009 against Arthur T. caused Rafaela Evans to switch her allegiance from Arthur T. to Arthur S after the lawsuit was settled in June 2013. The allegiance shift caused a personal rift between Evans and Arthur T. and Evan’s vote switched the balance between the two cousins. When the time came for the board of directors to elect executives in 2014, Arthur T. was voted out. Although Rafaela Evans did not have the power on her own to fire Arthur T., this example of interpersonal conflict exemplifies how relationships between individuals can affect the grand scheme of organizations. The workers believed that the firing of Arthur T. Demoulas would lead to the destruction of Market Basket. The belief that Arthur T. Demoulas’s firing would be the end of Market Basket was due to his replacements, James Gooch and Felicia Thornton. Gooch and Felicia Thornton were hired simply to ‘because they were experts at taking apart companies’. (QUOTE???) If Market Basket went down, employees would not only lose their jobs but they would be losing a great job that had benefits like scholarships and stock shares. Many of Market Basket’s employees that had been working there a long time had made it their careers and didn’t have experience elsewhere. Without outside experience, and a general reluctance or refusal to work for other grocery chains, those employees were filled with fear and anxiety because Market
To grasp the future of work one must watch the film of Sergio Kirby and Lixin Fan to obtain a firm knowledge of the future of work in order to improve upon it. Sergio Kirby’s Wal-Town: The Film is a 66 minute documentary filmed in Canada that seeks to raise public awareness on the negative impacts that Walmart introduces in small town Canadian communities. The documentary includes six university activists attempting to put an end to Walmart’s negative impacts by trekking a journey of public awareness across the various Walmart’s in Canada .The students conclude that Walmart negatively impacts small communities by forcing citizens to become consumers, denying unionization, and closing small business in the local areas. The film gathers
On the other hand, Sebastian Mallaby cares for the customer and the profits of the company, rather than the worker and their working conditions and wages. He suggests that Wal-Mart actually saves people money and is “a progressive story” (620). Their discount on food alone increases the welfare of the shoppers by fifty billion dollars a year. If you were to count all of Wal-Mart’s products into that same estimate, it would increase ten times. “This is very good news for poor and middle class families,” says Mallaby, because in this situation the customer really comes first. Even though the workers are not treated the best, they still have an advantage over the shoppers. They have less pay, but receive discounts on all of Wal-Mart’s merchandise whenever they shop there, which should be a plus for them. Compared to most companies Wal-Mart
The employees were getting paid a low hourly wage and they were not receiving any benefits. Sam Walton was chasing after power, it might not have been the power of having money, but making sure whenever someone talked about him in a positive way. Employers such as Walton are not generous and they are more than harmful when they stifle activism; for example “[w]hen workers tried to join unions and Wal-Mart ruthlessly crushed them, firing anyone foolish enough to speak out”(Packer,354). This example shows how the employees were powerless while working at Wal-Mart. Consequently, Wal-Mart was not the only company. If the Wal-Mart’s corporate heard anything about any worker wanting to receive more benefits about what was actually happening they would quickly act upon that and fire the employee. In addition, the power that corporate would show when other workers saw this would prevent any further action. While the workforce might be powerless, at least they are protected from the streets. On the other hand, women living in the ghetto who do things for safety is a source of power for them. In both of these situations, they are doing more harm than justice. Joan Morgan explains the struggle that takes place in the black community and more so in the black women’s community. Both groups, the low paying employees and African-American women are born to fail, but sadly either one are doing anything to try changing this problem and allows it to continue. The employees at
Trader Joe’s has great workforce management practices and its employees enjoy what they do. They have cheerful attitudes and are more than willing to assist customers with anything in the store. Trader Joe’s employees are engaged in conversation with the customers that shop in the store and make the customers aware of any new or exciting products from them to try. The positive behavior of these employees is due to the compensation and benefits each employee receives, which is far more competitive than other grocery food stores. Trader Joe’s has also created an environment where employees feel valued and know their opinions matter to the growth of the
Life in the early 1900’s wasn’t easy. Competition for jobs was at an all time high, especially in New York City. Immigrants were flooding in and needed to find work fast, even if that meant in the hot, overcrowded conditions of garment factories. Conditions were horrid and disaster was inevitable, and disaster did strike in March, 1911. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York set on fire, killing 146 workers. This is an important event in US history because it helped accomplish the tasks unions and strikes had tried to accomplish years earlier, It improved working conditions in factories nationwide and set new safety laws and regulations so that nothing as catastrophic would happen again. The workplace struggles became public after
After I read the case study what I had gained from reading it is that Starbucks does not want their employees under any circumstances to become unionized. The IWW believes that Starbucks does not treat their employee fair and equally because of the 42 percent of employees have company provided health insurance which is a lower percentage than Wal-Mart's 47 percent. In any case the IWW is trying to build a strong lawsuit against Starbucks because they believe that the New York Starbucks fired three employees that supported the IWW and gave the rest bad performance appraisals and stopped anyone from wearing the IWW's supporter pins. It is true that
Of course, the board does not confess to satisfying the greed for higher profits by taking these unpopular steps; they present all the process as catching up on the competitors. “GM has to do what it has to do in order to stay competitive, even if it means laying off thousands of people”, says a member of the board, and thus makes it more than clear that in a capitalist society the managers and the directors are concerned only with the profit maximization and with their own welfare, whereas the employees have to fight for their jobs in more and more unfavorable conditions. More than 30 000 workers have now lost their jobs, whereas the company’s chairman Roger Smith has just made $2 millions himself. The unions are no help at all in this moment. Supposed to increase the workers’ bargaining power, the unions have now become useless, since “too many people in the unions friends with the management”, whose interests, in this case, are completely the opposites to those of the workers.
One form organized labor took to protest were strikes. Unfortunately, the violent nature of these strikes did more harm than good to the cause of the labor unions. Strikes were often a waste of life, ended in a lot of destruction of property, and federal troops and militia were usually sent in to stop the strikers. The Haymarket Riot was one strike that arguably, hurt the cause the most. People within the riot were labelled anarchists and communists, many were killed in the riot itself, still others were sent to death after being determined guilty in a not so fair trial, and the rioters didn’t accomplish their goal. Furthermore, the riot only led to a
On July 11, 2013, a new leader was introduced in the Market Basket organization, Arthur S. Demoulas. The Market Basket community was informed that ASD gained control of the board of directors and had set an agenda. His agenda, alone, indicates what type of leader ASD would turn out to be. Arthur S. Demoulas set out with an agenda to fire Arthur T Demoulas, slow growth, take on debt and increase profits through price increases while increasing the wealth of the shareholders by stripping cash reserves. (Admin, 12/31/2013 Good Riddance 2013; retrieved: www.wearemarketbasket.com). As new CEO, the very first act was to distribute $250 million in profits to the nine family shareholders. The Boston Globe stated it best when they stated “it was an uncharacteristic act of greed for a firm known for its generous treatment of its workers and concern for price-conscious shoppers” (8/27/2013 Market Basket’s Decent into Greed; Retrieved: www.bostonglobe.com). ASD’s leadership style differs vastly from that of his predecessor. In fact, I’m not even sure how I would categorize ASD aside from greedy and self-centered. He does not
Enraged employees of Walmart across the country joined together to fight a similar cause: their inequitable wages and the poor hours they have to work to try and make ends meet. They were
Another major event in the case was Levy’s decision to fire his COO. When he first took the job in January, many board members urged him to fire her. He declined, and as of April 9th, he was happy with her performance and said he would not be making any major organizational changes. Less than a month later, however, he asked her to step down saying, among other things, that she never “got anything done” and that she exerted too much control over “people and data.” Structurally, her dismissal reinforced the hierarchy and role definition he had been working hard to establish. Additionally, he appeared to operating from the symbolic frame because, had he fired her immediately based on the advice of the board, it would have looked as though he wasn’t in charge. By waiting to fire her, he made it appear as though it was strictly his decision because deciding who the COO should be is not the “board’s job.”
The current state of national and even international protests is one that has engendered a great deal of conversation and debate. The level of damage caused by the existence of protesters in many different cities in the nation, has been felt financially and emotionally by those involved and those on the outside and also by the private and public entities charged with the job of cleaning up the messes. The manner in which the occupy movement evolved over time demonstrates a significant social movement and responses by officials that responded to concerns all over many cities where protesters gathered. As someone who was witness but not a participant in the protests there were many questions despite wholehearted agreement in the cause that was being protested, income disparity and the privilege of the wealthy. This writer was keenly interested in how the occupy movement evolved in Portland Oregon as it to me demonstrated a fascinating social development. Few arrests were made but an outrageous amount of damage was done to first the park and then later businesses that were blockaded by protesters.
They are currently one of the top 10 employers in the Dothan Alabama Area and have approximately 350 employees at the one Dothan facility, but over 2,000 in total. Since both laws and people’s moral obligations are driving away from the inhumane business, Wayne farms is sure to see a loss in sales. “It’s a massive operation, but if more people protest their ways by buying organic products, Wayne Farms is sure to have a sustainable loss.” says local tractor dealership owner located less than two miles away from Wayne Farms. This means that Wayne Farms as well as the whole industry will experience slashes in profits and any good reputation. This shows that local people see the potentially devastating movement that has swept across the country, first starting in urban centers. It is evident that a lower amount of buyers will equal a lower amount of sales, which will provide a smaller total profit. The decrease will also mean that less of the product is demanded and that Wayne farms is bound to produce a lesser quantity of chickens. With this all being said, the need for jobs will be in a downtrend and employees will be terminated from their duties. This will leave a substantial impact on Alabama’s southeast economy with more and more people pouring into the unemployment sector and will clearly cause the unemployment rate to spike
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is the world 's largest retail enterprise, with total revenue of $421.8 billion and a net income of $16.4 billion in 2011. 1 It is also the world 's largest employer, with 2.1 million employees worldwide in 2010 2, not including workers hired by its providers. In my opinion, Wal-Mart provides a clear illustration through which to look at how many multinational companies (MNCs) take part in an illegal and unethical behavior. They use their bargaining power and market control to pressure countries to overlook environmental degradation and violation of national labor laws. They dictate expected pricing for products, particularly through imports from overseas countries. Labor is fulfilled mostly by underage and underpaid employees. In the United States, since 2005, Wal-Mart has paid about $1 billion in damages to U.S. employees in six different cases related to unpaid work. 3 Furthermore, Wal-Mart opposes any form of collective action, even when employees are not seeking unionization, but simply more respect. 4 The fact that Wal-Mart opposes unions exist. The company has a long history of fighting them, to the point of closing stores after employees organize. Managers have been instructed to talk to their teams about why unions are so unwanted in their business. Overseas, the company was involved in a series of scandals, including multiple cases of bribery. In April 2012, The New York Times published a story that
In that period, there existed a labor union named the Knights of Labor, which committed serious boycotts. Their so-called organized boycotters were more like gangsters. Whoever was in opposition of the Knights of Labor would be isolated both commercially and interpersonally. They could barely be able to buy any food, because they were personally boycotted. If their friends saw them, cross the street. Finally this wicked boycott method encountered some diehard merchants. Esther Gray, who was a bakeress in New York, showed the mass that “a person may be placed beyond the reach of the boycott by public sympathy.”(Glickman 140) That was an anti-boycott, “consumer power deployed in defense of a boycotted business.”(Glickman 140)