Why Is It Wrong To Kill A Fetus?

“Abortion is not a crime in Canada but it is an area of the law” (Duhaime, 2010) that isn’t black and white. It has been completely legal since 1988 and our government should keep it that way. For as much as some people are anti-abortion or ‘pro-life’ they need to understand that women have abortions for a variety of reasons one being that an abortion can actually benefit the unborn child. Those who are anti-choice also claim that abortion is wrong because it violates the rights of the fetus, but what about the rights of the woman? It is a woman’s right to decide what she does with her body and though it is much debated; a fetus by logical argument is not a person and does not hold any rights. Finally, even if abortion was made illegal as

Moral and legal right to life _____________________________________ Abortion is always argued with different cases and play a main role in medical ethics (blackwell.,p291).It is evidently reasonable for some to argue that in moral situation, abortion is a murder and it should be illegal, while others may claim that abortion is woman’s right when concerning on autonomy ( The abortion debate in Australia). Opponents of making abortion legal claim that abortion is a kind of murder on extend of moral situation. It is always regarded as a sin to kill a person who is no aggressor in most moral communities (new ethics 1). Fetus is a biologically human as it is not just a part of the mothers, such as a lung or a kidney. On the contrary, it is obvious that fetus is human due to he or she has genetic code of human and human parents as well (abortion myth p5). Moreover, it has potentiality to be a person with primary moral worth (text book p210-211). As Gillion (new ethics) pointed out, every person has his right to life, especially he is not an aggressor. This point is also been pointed by (Rebecca and john,Blackwell p204), “embryos has a right to life” .The fetus is innocent and

Don Marquis argument is more convincing than Mary Anne Warren’s The fetus has a valuable future, just as we consider children, the retarded or mentally ill to have valuable futures, thus killing a fetus is not morally permissible. Another pro-choice argument is that the fetus has no desire to live and consequently there is no wrongness in killing. Marquis criticizes this viewpoint, as society believes it is morally wrong to kill those who have no desire to live, and those who are unconscious or suicidal (Gedge & Waluchow, 2012, p220).

“To Be or Not to Be” What is this world coming to? Some people truly believe it is right to kill an innocent fetus. Mothers’ who are old enough to conceive are old enough to support a baby, whether they are barely a teenager or coming to the end of their “golden years.” Regardless of the circumstance, a baby should never be aborted.

Should abortion be illegal in Australia? Introduction- Right now, thousands of children around the world are in a live or die situation, in which their mother decides whether to keep or to terminate them. There are multiple issues that Pro-Life and Pro-Choice argue about constantly trying to justify if abortion should be legal or Illegal. While the mother has rights, the fetus also has rights.

As in other countries, Abortion was once illegal in Canada, and only allowed to be performed on the criminal law principle of necessity to save the life of the pregnant woman. When it comes to 1988, however, Supreme Court of Canada has decriminalised the abortion law since Section 251 (the law regarding to abortion) violated Section 7 of the Canadian Chart of Rights and Freedom, which guarantees the right to live, liberty, and security of the person. Therefore, it is now permitted in Canada for a woman to have an abortion for any reasons which she desires.

It has been over 25 years since the Supreme Court of Canada decriminalized abortion. In 1988 the court declared that section 251 of the Criminal Code of Canada, which did not allow women access to abortion services without the consent of a physician, infringed on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These rights guarantee the “security of person” which the court determined included access to medical care and procedures that include abortion services (Bourgeois, 23). In principle the amendment of this law has been instrumental for women’s rights and their autonomy in reproductive health decisions, but in practice this might not be the case.

Fact: Before 1988, the Criminal Code prohibited abortion unless the life or health of a woman was endangered, the section 251(4) of the Code required them to obtain a certificate from a therapeutic abortion committee of an accredited or approved hospital. In 1998, a very significant decision took place regarding

gestation. Canada does not have an abortion law, so abortion is governed by the same

Thou shalt not kill; one-tenth of what may arguably be the most famous guidelines of morality in the western culture, and also the main driving force for pro-life advocates. The argument supporting their beliefs typically starts with the premises that a fetus is a person, and to destroy or to kill a person is unethical. Therefore abortion, the premeditated destruction of a human being, is murder, and consequently unethical. I deny the fact that the fetus, what I will refer to as an embryo up to 22 weeks old, has the right to live. The opposing argument is invalid because a fetus, although perhaps a part of human species, is not formally a person. This leaves it simply to be a part of the woman?s body, whose fate lies solely in the

If a pregnancy is unwanted or unplanned, does that mean the life of an unborn child should go to waste? Abortion cannot be the solution, it promotes that human life is disposable. If Canadians are uninformed about the abortion guidelines it can affect their decision to abort the child. In Canada, there is a 24-week deadline for women to have abortions. Many factors impact a woman’s judgement to have an abortion, one of which includes religion. However, physical and emotional factors can also impact the mother when terminating a pregnancy. Canadian guidelines should be changed to further restrict “late-term” abortions; abortions should only be permitted under special circumstances due to the numerous valid ethical implications that go hand in

She urged the society to stop blaming women for making such decisions, “We don’t think that women have the right to self, they are supposed to live for others” (p.17). She also discussed the true social benefits of abortion rights and forced her readers to think about real life

Nowadays, a lot of people are debating about whether abortion should be legal or illegal in Canada. In fact, Canada criminalized abortion in the 19th century like most other countries; however, in 1988 abortion was legalized in Canada, though access to abortions has not been equitable across provinces. Abortion should be legal in Canada because it gives women control over their bodies, it prevents over population and it helps people who are not ready to be parents.

Even though the baby cannot speak or walk yet, it is still a life, and no one has the right to take another person’s life.

Problem statement Abortion is permissible under certain circumstances, but right to abortion under these circumstances gives mankind the right to destroy life, which is something we have no absolute right in destroying. A fetus is life with no fundamental human rights, therefore the process of abortion doesn’t affect any human rights violation.