It's Time for West Virginia to Eliminate Food Tax Essay

Taxing junk food isn’t as bad as people may think. “ In 1972, U.S consumers spent $3 billion a year on fast food; today we spend more than $110 billion.”, said Cummins . If only we put a tax on junk foods this number would go up and the tax money could be used for all of the collateral damages it causes. Another reason why taxing junk food isn’t as bad as people may think is because “ junk food kills”, stated Cummins. The junk food industry is in a similar position that the tobacco industry was once. After many decades the truth is finally becoming crystal clear.

Huge debts were owed to Great Britain for supplying the colonists with military support and supplies. To pay the dues, there was the establishment of the Stamp Act, the taxation on domestic goods and services. A tax on domestic merchandise brought even more anger to the colonists. The Sugar Act, the Townshed Duties and the Tea Act were also all introduced with the same fundamentals: applying tax on goods whether it be directly or indirectly, domestic or international. “British commercial regulations imposed a paltry economic burden on Americans, who enjoyed a rapid economic growth and a standard of living higher than their European counterparts” (McGaughy). Each act resulted in irritated colonists. Some even retaliated by tarring and feathering certain English tax enforcers living in the colonies.

Although England had repealed most of the taxes, they continued tax one thing that was important to the colonists, tea. The many protests and boycotts of the colonies escalated into the Boston Tea Party. More than a hundred angry demonstrators gathered together, dressed as American Indians, and invaded the vessels carrying the tea shipments on the Boston Harber. These protesters smashed open the crates with their tomahawks and dumped each and every package of tea into the ocean, adding to the heaping debt of the

Did you hear about the taxes that were put on many of our papers. On March 22, 1765, the British Parliament passed the “Stamp Act” to help pay for British troops stationed in the colonies during the Seven Years’ War. It required the colonists' to pay a tax, represented by a stamp, on various papers, documents, and playing cards. They had colonists pay for British soldiers to stay in their homes. They put a lot of taxes on tea also.

This is why it all started because England was taxing the colonists for no reason.

"They say power to tax is a necessary part of every supreme legislative authority and that if they have not that power over America they have none and the America is at once a kingdom of itself" [Raising Money and Rising Anger. 22]. later many started complaining that the king had no right to tax them this much. Other than the Americans don't like their duty of being taxed the British were also being taxed as well. Colonist got used to their taxation within their own government.

The king would not get any extra money from taxes that way. On top of that, the British merchants would not get any money, so the merchants were getting mad. The first tax did not get as much resistance because it was the first, and the colonists probably thought taxes would be temporary. But with the townshend acts, the colonists were a little mad. This caused the first major drop in values. For some reason when the Townshend Acts were repealed, values shot way up, then down but not quite all the way back down. Then the Sons of Liberty went down to the Boston Harbor. They were dressed like Indians and dumped all the tea into the harbor in what is called the Boston Tea Party (Doc. 4). As punishment, the coercive acts were established, closing the Boston Harbor. Without direct imports, colonists practically stopped all trade and imports lost almost all value.

The British Crown originally taxed the colonists to pay for the debt that was caused by the French and Indian War. Many colonists thought it unfair because they were being charged to pay a debt that they felt they did not owe. The rebellion started small, and grew over time. The British response was to create more acts and laws to suppress the colonists. The patriots’

Imagine being an active participant in the American Revolution in the late 1700s. Not only that, imagine being on the side fighting for your freedom. The war ends, you're in the clear for a leisurely life of freely doing what you please, and you're happy. You're also a farmer that happens to be located in Pennsylvania. Before you know it, Congress comes to the decision to pass a tax on the production and distribution of whiskey, one of your main crops. What? Woah, woah, woah, wait a minute, did you not just fight a whole war against the taxes being imposed on you? A war for your rights? This can't be right, it just cannot be. Ah, but it is all too true. In the 1790s, a tax was passed that raised the price on distributing whiskey. This

The Patriots demand liberty, freedom, consent, and representation in the colonies. As heard in the Provincial Congress, many Patriots want to revolt against the British tyranny. The Boston Tea Party is a prime example of the Patriot’s reaction to British rule. The Sons of Liberty dumped tea into the Boston Harbor due to the Tea Act. The British are threatening us with their standing armies and other unjust taxes, such as the Quartering Act and the Intolerable Acts. In the Consideration on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes, Daniel Dulany believes that “ a tax imposed by Parliament, is a tax without their consent” (Dulany 133), because there is no colonial representation

Sugary drinks and fast foods are constantly being consumed by Americans, causing an increase in health problems. Government regulation of what we eat and drink is fair because it will increase awareness of what individuals eat and can prevent higher rates of obesity. The article by Ryan Jaslow, "Sugary drinks over 16-ounces banned in New York City, Board of Health Votes" clearly supports the banning. However, “Should the Government Regulate What We Eat?" argues that the ban puts the American values of freedom at risk. Such regulations are necessary in order to maintain a healthy environment.

The first concern is that the colonists began to have personal ID’s. A lot of soldiers lost their English ID’s fighting the French and Indian war. Historians elect to assert, " The cutting-area warfare began on the Plains of Abraham”; which substitute into the final conflict of the French and Indian warfare. Because the warfare happened in Europe, the colonists felt that this was unfair and because they had no representation in Parliament they had an excellent form of objections to the tax. Remember that they weren't allowed to fabricate something at the time. All uncooked products were required to be sent to England and then shipped back as finished products. Those uncooked products have been taxed while they entered England and then taxed

Who has not eaten junk food at least once? I did it, and to me, as to many Americans, the junk food is the most delicious type of food. However, I know it is the unhealthiest food and the main cause of obesity in the United States. On the other hand, the U.S. government feels that is important to intervene in junk food lover’s lives to help them to improve their health and their food choices. In order to combat the obesity and other health problems that junk food causes, the U.S. government has been looking for many ways to prevent and decrease the number of obese people in the country. They believe that adding taxes to the junk food is a great idea that might help people to

"Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables”, is a short article about the different foods that are considered “bad” and that we should tax them and have cheaper prices on good food like fruits and vegetables. “Attacking the Obesity Epidemic by First Figuring Out Its Cause”, is a short story about attacking the different the ways that bad food can be consumed by the people who eat it, through vending machines and stands. “No Lunch Left Behind”, is a short story about how every child in America deserves a healthful and delicious lunch that is prepared with fresh ingredients and how no child should be denied a free lunch in schools. All of the articles compare to each other, by attacking the main subject of all short stories,“Bad Food”. Bad food is

The fact is that in our country, any government intrusion looks undesirable. We are so used to making free choice and to having access to everything we need and want that we have already forgotten the value and usefulness of the government control. No, that does not mean that the government must control everything and everyone. What I mean here is that the government control should be balanced with the freedom of choice. Unfortunately, plentiful foods do not lead to improved health conditions. We cannot always make a relevant choice. Our hurried lifestyles make us extremely fast, and eating is not an exception. We eat fast, but fast does not always mean useful. I believe, and in this essay I argue that the government must have a say in our