The topic of whether couples should undergo the usage of various reproductive technologies, especially IVF, for purposes such as selecting the gender of their unborn baby, is an intense ongoing debate. In-vitro fertilisation or for short IVF, was made available in the late 1970’s, in order to assist women who encountered certain forms of infertility that prevented them to give birth and bear children (George, 2005). There are currently various arguments for the use of IVF in choosing the sex of an unborn baby, which include the practical and biological reasons whereas arguments against the usage of IVF involve social and ethical reasons.
In-vitro fertilisation is a procedure used to overcome a range of fertility issues and helps conceive
…show more content…
The Australian Health Ethics Community (AHEC) states, “Admission to life should not be conditioned upon a child being of a particular sex” (Nhmrc.gov.au, 2004). Although this can seem unfair, The AHEC believes that selecting the sex of your child can be a contributing cause of an expression of sexual and social prejudice. Is conceiving a daughter more beneficial than conceiving a son or the other way around? Will choosing the sex of your child improve the family than a child who you had no idea their gender would be? Dr. Tom Shakespeare, a lecturer from the University of Cambridge and author of a gender study regarding IVF, commented, “I fear children could be turning into consumer items and that sex selection could potentially lead to choosing babies on the basis of hair or eye colour” (News.bbc.co.uk, 2005). This comment discloses how children can soon start to turn into products that parents can choose and produce depending on what they want. Correlating with this information, Tereza Hendl, a health science researcher from the University of Sydney, says, “Gender selection is an expression of sexism as it reinforces a binary view of children.” The life of a person should not depend on their gender, as your gender should not define you as a person or the traits you develop. It discards the fact that conceiving a child is meant to be all-natural. Unless couples are unable to reproduce on their own due to genetic disorders or infertility, IVF can be an option couples may choose to use in order to conceive a child of their
Making big choices in life can be difficult, especially if that big choice is having children. There are many men and women who are infertile that still want to have children. Most decide to adopt other children who do not have families or their families do not want them. But when adoption is not an option, there is now a way where those men and women can have their own children together through fertility treatments. Fertility treatments could be a good thing:being able to freeze egg and sperm, they can help infertile couples, and avoiding transmitted diseases would be easier.
We are living in a new era where technology can help women have babies in unconventional ways. Having children is a personal choice. In some people’s view, government should not be regulating when people should and should not start having a family. The ethical issue is when the parents start applying for governmental benefits after the baby is conceived via In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and born posthumously. When practicing IVF, are we violating God’s will? This paper is to discuss the views of the four candidates interviewed in relation to posthumous conception and delivery, their views on benefits/inheritance entitlement to these babies, and ethical principles and theories in
Medical professionals today can screen for certain genetic traits (genetic diseases and sex) with in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to obtain a healthy child, and reproductive technology continues to improve. With this in mind, the question arises whether sex selection is ethical. Julian Savulescu, Uehiro Professor of Practical Ethics at Oxford University, argues that sex selection is moral, based on his ethical principle of Procreative Beneficence: that “couples (or single reproducers) should select the child, of the possible children they could have, who is expected to have the best life, or at least as good a life as the others, based on the relevant, available information” [Savulescu 1]. Savulescu claims
Over the course of the semester the topic I felt that I analyzed and reflected upon most was sex selection. Sex selection is a topic that I knew very little about at the beginning of this semester, but I have come to learn a lot about and appreciate over these past few weeks. Sex selection refers to numerous methods that allow one to select the desired sex of their embryo. Technologies that include ultrasounds or prenatal testing followed by selective abortion, preimplantation genetic selection (PGS) for sex, as well as numerous sperm-sorting methods, are readily available for families that yearn for a particular sex of their unborn child. I have considered both sides of the argument against and in favor of sex selection, but my view is sincerely against sex selection.
In a year, around four million babies are born just in the United States of America [5]. Some individuals claim that there is no way to identify when one is ready to conceive a child that is theirs, be that as it may, depending how one is raised there are certain criteria that is required to be met. First, one must be able to support the child financially. Second, the child that will be brought into this world must be surrounded with love in order for it to prospects in life. Finally, the future parent has an obligation to fully understand the consequences of their decisions regarding the child. Couples may wish a child of their own, though the turn out of the deed, arises complications leading towards the approach of assisted reproductive
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) marks a great step forward in medical technology, and Australia is a leader in the field. IVF is now a popular procedure for couples who are infertile or are having trouble conceiving. However, it raises ethical, moral and legal issues including the rights of an individual, property rights, the definition of human life, scientific experimentation versus a potential human life, religion, costs, and community, medical and taxpayer’s rights.
ICSI is used as a part of in vitro fertilization, IVF, to enhance the fertilization phase
“For years, reproductive specialists have been helping people become parents, even enabling them to choose the sex of their baby. One fertility doctor is taking things a step further, offering what some are calling ‘designer babies,’ as Early Show national correspondent Hattie Kauffman reports” (CBS News). Though designer babies are not yet feasible, choosing the gender of the baby is. This is possible through in-vitro fertilization, a process in which an egg is retrieved from a mother and sperm is donated by a father, then combined together in a lab to make a fertilized egg. During this process, it is possible for the parents to allow the egg to go through Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. PGD is when embryologists remove a cell from the
An in-vitro fertilization, also called an IVF, is when a man's sperm and a woman's egg is taken and combined in a laboratory. Once fertilization occurs, the egg is implanted into the woman's womb where it develops naturally. In the United States, the average cost of in-vitro fertilization is around $12,500 per cycle. Many patients require more than one cycle to achieve pregnancy. Thankfully, most IVF Doctors give a considerable discount for multiple cycle IVF. In the United States of America the cost of IVF can be as low as $5000 to as high as $30,000 depending on how many cycles are needed and if a donor is needed for the egg or the sperm. The cost of IVF varies on locale, Doctor and what is included. Most IVF costs include pre blood tests, ultrasounds and retrieval cycle monitoring, and egg retrieval and embryo transfer. Most IVF costs do not include prescription medications, pre-testing and diagnoses of patient's partner, anaesthesia and medical care needed due to the IVF procedure. In addition, IVF costs do not typically include extra tests and procedures such as Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Assisted zona hatching, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, gender
Mini IVF or minimal ovarian stimulation IVF is a treatment of assisted reproduction in which sperm and eggs together in the laboratory using advanced techniques in order to create the best embryos. Unlike other treatments and techniques, ovarian stimulation is lower because the natural cycle of women and their hormones are utilized, and therefore less medication is needed.
toward the future child who will live without his father” (Ethical Dilemmas of Intra-vitro Fertilization, Retrieved November 5, 2015 http://journal.managementinhealth. Com /index. php/rms/article/view/109/262).
With new technologies available everyday, it seems almost as if we can customize our children. Reproduction is no longer an outcome of random and inherited genes, but now it’s a process of creating the child that we want to have. Fertility clinics are in debate as to whether or not it is ethical to be able to determine the sex of our children. Some view this as a valid option, while others see it as another step down the road to designer babies. But how far is too far? That is a question that we can only answer for ourselves. While this article remains unbiased, we are able to form our own opinion after seeing the pros and cons of both sides.
IVF raises many of these difficult moral issues. If the above conceptions about the nature of ethics were correct, however, discussion of these issues would either be futile (because morality is a matter of personal choice or opinion) or superfluous (because morality is what a divine or secular authority says it is) (Walters 23). In this paper, I want to suggest that it is not only possible, but also necessary to inquire into the ethics of such practices as IVF because the fact that we can do something does not mean that we ought to do it.
IVF has many benefits for couples who have tried to conceive a child of their own and have little or no success. IVF takes nature into the laboratory and gives a helping hand with the fertilization of the egg. Many times this is attempted because of the egg not being able to fall into the fallopian tube