J.M Coetzee's "The Harms of Pornography"

Tropp, Sandra Fehl., and Ann Pierson. D'Angelo. "Pornography (1983)." Essays in Context. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 543-47. Print.

I will focus on the following emotional appeal/need? Do what is right in a free country.

Freedom to pursue life’s goal without government interference or government guarantees that nobody is in need. Those are the big questions the average citizen wonder. In an article made by Roger Cohen . He was able to ask these questions to both European and American Citizens. The numbers weren’t surprising where 58 percent of Americans chose freedom over state pledge to eradicate neediness. The opposite with for the European citizens, where in Britain 55 percent chose State guarantees. In Germany, France and Spain the numbers are higher with a 62 percent. As an American I understand why my fellow countrymen would pick freedom.

The first major component in life is to know that there is no such thing as being completely free. In the world, to be free means, one must have money and to be able to make sacrifices. Additionally, in order for one to earn the freedom they shall defend countries that already spoken as free, to stay free. A great President, Harry Truman, once said, “we must assist free peoples to work out their own destinies in their own way (Doc 1 A).” This President spoke of freedom, and the problems of the government. President Truman also said, “ the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. The choice is too often not a free one. One way of life is based upon freedom of

freedom. It may be limited but it's worth fighting for because we believe it the best for

on the oppression of women and facilitation of rape culture and violence. The question is not if pornography is virtuous. The question is if government has the ability to regulate and control pornographic material, or if that regulation through law pushed through by Radical feminists is against one’s individual sphere of liberty like liberals and liberal feminists would agree.

In the United States, pornography is considered to be neither legal nor illegal. With the exception of child pornography, there are no laws regarding the sell, distribution, creation, nor purchase of pornography. Despite studies finding it to be “degrading and detrimental to society”, Congress is not able to regulate pornography. One of the reasons is the current misinterpretation of church and state. Congress is not able to use religious standards of morality to judge obscenity.

In the coming paragraphs, I will prove that Ronald Dworkin’s criticisms and critiques of Catherine Mackinnon’s views towards pornography and society are largely unfounded and immaterial, and that government intervention via legislation is required in the protection of women’s interests. I will begin by explaining Catherine Mackinnon’s opinion and support for the Butler decision and thereafter, I will discuss Ronald Dworkin’s critique of it. After outlining their positions, I will proceed to highlight the areas of incommensurability between their arguments. My perspective

For many years there has been a lot of arguments about the ethical and morality of pornography. pornography is defined as the depiction of erotic behavior intended to cause sexual excitement. When it coms down to pornography, people have different opinions about it. Some people might find it moral because it gives them pleasure and it satisfies them physically. some individuals see it as a form of art that describes the figure of a human body in an artistic form. Others see it as immoral because it harms and degrades an individual. Personally I believe that it all depends how pornography is conducted and how we respond to it. It can be morally healthy that we like it because it makes us happy, such as it helps with your marriage relationship in intimacy, and it can be immoral when it is used in an unhealthy that we do not like it because hurts an innocent person.

The seemingly main reason there is such a growth in pornography is because almost everyone and everything in the world reacts and relates to sex. People are captivated with sex and are excited to see something new or something they have not seen before. People are always looking for a version of sex that is new or more different than the norm. This is soaring the pornography industry to grow one step further in order to keep up with the demand.

The controversy over whether pornography should or should not be restricted has been a widely debated topic over the past few decades. Proponents of such restriction bring to light the degrading message pornography depicts that perpetrates the silencing of women. Even though the silencing and subordination of women is a real phenomenon, the overall significance and effect the pornography industry has on it seems widely overestimated. Furthermore, the implications of such restriction seem far more severe when compared to the overall disadvantages the pornography industry creates.

Humanity has struggled with determining the best option to solve their ethical dilemmas that they run into in their life. Analyzing and determining the best option to take can leave an individual lost in faith and building a relationship with God. Building a God foundation in your life will help you in every ethical dilemma that you face. The only way to solve an ethical dilemma with viewing pornography is to view the dilemma according to a Christian worldview and compare different options to solve the ethical dilemma.

In recent years, the term pornography has been primarily associated with that which is accessed and streamed over the internet, rather than the literal definition of, “obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, especially those having little or not artistic merit.” This form of visual pornography is a popular and successful business as it is viewed for fulfilling pent up sexual desires, however it promotes the act of having multiple sex partners without the need of any commitment. Although it is for this reason that this business is permitted, there are many overlooked, long – term affects that have become topics of controversy. Not only does pornography affect those who indulge in it, but it can influence those who divulge

Lindsay Rohland (2015) defined an ethical dilemma as, “a complicated situation in which one must make a difficult choice or decision in the face of conflicting morals.” The choice between right or wrong may seem a challenging but a person’s morals are typically influenced by religion. Christianity has answers for every dilemma a person could be facing. The ethical dilemma of pornography will be analyzed by the Christian worldview, and compared to the perspective of the pantheistic worldview.

The book, “America’s war on sex: The continuing Attack on Law, Lust, and Liberty” by Marty Klein is a book that impacts on the sexual intellect of an individual. He is an American public policy analysts, author, educator, and sex therapist (Klein 6). Consequently, Klein is decisive of bowdlerization concerning the concepts of porn addiction, sex addiction, and anti-pornography movement. The book depicts how governments and religious right incorporates the regulation of information, health care, sexual expression, and entertainment to undermine the secular democracy of the society. According to Klein’s research, the today’s public policies are trying to resolve the wrong sexual predicaments. The policies ignore the genuine sexual issues that the American population is continuing to struggle with, which raises the demand for more suppressive approaches that does not work. The book’s target audience is the Americans and individual’s tasked with the formulation of the public policies. Klein presents a fast-paced and meticulous research that untangles the myths regarding aspects such as porn 's actual effect to the society, the failure of the public policy, and the so-called "activist judges" (Klein 30). The paper provides my evidence regarding reading of the book, gives a thoughtful analysis and critique, besides the general evaluation of the book.