J. R Stroop

In another study, five experiments were conducted to determine if coloring a single Stroop element reduced automaticity or slowed the processing of a color. The results demonstrated that indeed it slowed processing of congruent and neutral stimuli more than it slows processing of incongruent stimuli (Monahan, 2001).

An interesting challenge arises when a task such as color naming is identified as both controlled and automatic, by varying the other task involved. Color naming is identified as a controlled process when the other task is word reading, but as an automatic process when the other task is shape naming. Cohen, Dunbar and McClelland (1990) proposed an alternative explanation of the Stroop effect, which does not distinguish between automatic and controlled processing. Instead, they proposed that automaticity is a range, and that Stroop interference depends on the relative degree of learning the particular tasks, not on processing speed.

Learning to read is beginning to develop earlier in elementary grades. Students are expected to be emergent readers by the time he or she leaves kindergarten and enters first grade. If a child is not, he or she is labeled as being behind. According to Hughes (2007) emergent readers are using early reading strategies in consistently, read easy patterned text, retell text with simple storyline, and respond to text at a literal level. Hughes (2007) also says literacy develops in young children through play, daily conversation and interactions with text of all kinds. Many children come with emergent literacy skills; can recognize signs and labels, scribble letters, retell stories by pointing at pictures and talking about them, and some have varying degrees of phonemic and phonological awareness. This essay will define and explain implication for each theory in learning to read.

According to Victor Hugo, "To learn to read is to light a fire; every syllable that is spelled out is a spark." Furthermore, educators must help kids learn to read as Victor Hugo has stated because each syllable “is a spark” which ignites a new world of words and stories for every child. Fortunately, many psychologists have studied specific aspects of the reading process, which in turn has created different reading models. One of the most recent reading models is the Dual Route Cascade model (DRC) which is a computational model of reading aloud with visual recognition. A computational model is a cognitive task where a computer mimics human cognitive processing. Moreover, this is the only model that can perform the two most common tasks used

The Stroop effect was tested on four different tasks. Nineteen Queens College students were recruited by flyer, and each were assigned to a word reading task, color reading task, color inhibition task, and word inhibition task. They were timed using a stopwatch function on a cell phone, to name the color, or word to the quickest of their ability. In the order from longest reaction time to shortest: inhibition color naming task, color naming task, inhibition word reading, and word reading. This study shows that people can read words more quickly than they can name colors, and that inhibiting an automatic response to color/word tasks will take longer to do than tasks that do not involve inhibition.

The Stroop experiment by J. Ridley Stroop in 1935 was performed in order to analyze the reaction time of participant’s stimuli and desired results while also obtaining a collective result of color interference and word reading(Stroop, 1935; Lee & Chan, 2000). In the experiment three forms of the test were given, the first consisting of color patches, the second had the color words printed in black and the other was an incongruent test beaming the color did not match the color word

In the control group, Stroop (1935) printed all of the words in black. In both conditions, Stroop (1935) printed the words twice in each row and twice in each column. Stroop (1935) did not print the colors in the corresponding color of ink and also did not repeat words in a row or column. For his first experiment, Stroop (1935) used 70 college student volunteers. Half of the students (half of each sex) completed the control, then the experimental sheet, then experimental sheet again, and then the control (Stroop, 1935).

In Stroop’s (1935) interference article, it was discovered that there is more interference in color naming then color reading. The experiment described in the article tested whether there was more interference from words or from colors (Stroop 1935). Two tests were administered each with a separate control. The RCNd test determined how fast one could read color names where the color was different from the color name while the NCWd test determined how fast one could name colors where the color was different from the word on the page. The mean time for 100 responses increased from 63.3 seconds on the RCNd test to 110.3 seconds on the NCWd test or an

Automaticity: Fluent readers recognize familiar words automatically without conscious thought, and they identify unfamiliar words almost as quickly.

Upon reflection and completion of this course, there are a few literacy practices I have used or observed in the past which do not support decoding automaticity. First, “popcorn reading” as a strategy is one where I believe it does not promote decoding automaticity. To elaborate, popcorn reading is the practice of whole class reading of an article or book where students take turns reading the sample of the text. While it may promote some collaborative learning practices, there more strategies available such as echo reading or peer-assisted reading that accomplish this skill. Popcorn reading does not provide enough of a sample as a teacher to assess the abilities of the student or enough practice for the student to improve their skills.

This science experiment is conducted to perform a controlled experiment to investigate the Stroop Effect. It works because we read words faster than we identify colours. This experiment also compares the time taken to say the colours of words, like the picture on the cover, when the colour doesn’t match the written to when the colour does match the written word.

Have you ever asked yourself the question, how do words and color influence what we see and what our brain processes? The uses of words on their own have a much stronger influence over a person’s ability to say the color. The interference that occurs between the different information received by the brain causes a conflict to occur. This happens because of what the words say and what the color of the words mean. J. Ridley Stroop developed his experimental theories to explain this occurrence. The first theory was called "Speed of Processing Theory". He showed that the Interference occurs because, people are able to read words much quicker and to name the color of the word is much more complex. The second theory was called "Selective Attention Theory". Interference occurs because; naming the actual color of the words requires much more attention than reading the

For a child who is just starting to learn to read, they need sufficient practice in reading a variety of different books to achieve fluency. Reading can be complex and has many different aspects (Burns,1999). It is suggested that children who have problems reading and writing at a young age will find it hard to catch up as they get older and will not reach their full potential as adults, many will withdraw from school or society and some becoming involved with crime (MacBlain,2014). 40 percent of children find learning to read a challenge but with early help, most reading problems can be prevented (Reading Rockets, n.d.).

We are replicating J.R. Stroop’s original experiment The Stroop Effect (Stroop, 1935). The aim of the study was to understand how automatic processing interferes with attempts to attend to sensory information. The independent variable of our experiment was the three conditions, the congruent words, the incongruent words, and the colored squares, and the dependent variable was the time that it took participants to state the ink color of the list of words in each condition. We used repeated measures for the experiment in order to avoid influence of extraneous variables. The participants were 16-17 years of age from Garland High School. The participants will be timed on how long it takes them to say the color of the squares and the color of the words. The research was conducted in the Math Studies class. The participants were aged 16-17 and were students at Garland High School. The results showed that participants took the most time with the incongruent words.

Reading is believed to be an easy task, something we all learning and develop through the years as we grow, however, is it really that simple? To reading and understanding are both essential when a student begins to read. It is a complex action that requires a multitude of different actions/components, all working at the same time, to become a successful reader. The components that are pertinent to reading are: comprehension, oral language, phonological awareness, phonics, fluency and vocabulary. Without these components, reading may very well be irrelevant because it does not make sense to read and not understand what is being transmitted/relayed. According to the National Reading Panel (NRP), “a combination of techniques is effective for