Jacob Herrel's Case Summary

Larry denied being under the influence of drugs or alcohol when this current crime occurred and self-admitted to using marijuana five times in the last three months. Larry successfully completed substance abuse treatment with Tidewater Youth Services Commission in 2016.

policy will be followed, and may result in dismissal of the student from Indiana Wesleyan

The CCSB found Tatro responsible for violating the student code of conduct despite her defense and explanation of her personal statements. The CCSB imposed the following sanctions: “1.) Changing Tatro's grade in MORT 3171 to an "F." 2.) Completion of a "directed study course" in clinical ethics. 3.) A letter to one of the faculty members in the Mortuary Science Program addressing the issue of respect within the program and the profession. 4.) A psychiatric evaluation at the student health service clinic and completion of any recommendations made by their evaluation. 5.) Placement on probation for the remainder of Tatro's undergraduate career” (Tatro v. University of Minnesota, 2012). Following these sanctions, Tatro would be allowed to complete the Mortuary Science

Petitioner’s appeal from a denial of that motion was dismissed by the Court of Appeals without any prejudice to relief under the Maryland. The petition for post- conviction relief was dismissed by the trial court; and on appeal the Court of appeals held that suppression of the evidence by the prosecution denied petitioner due process of law and remanded the case for a retrial of the question of punishment, not the question of guilt.

The sentence for Mr Bradford Thomas was for possession and supply of a dangerous drug over a seven-week period, from the 15 November 2014 to 8 January 2015. Mr Thomas has twenty-five cases of selling crystal methamphetamine and two cases of selling cannabis.

His codefendant, David K. Hopper, 23, whose last known address was 800 S. Washington St., Millersburg, pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in marijuana, stemming from the June 23 transaction. His request for treatment in lieu of conviction was granted by Rinfret.

At 14:32 Haring was arrested for OWI and fleeing the scene of an accident. He was taken away for booking and a Data Master Breathalyzer test.

William Peace University has received an application from one of your students, William Adams. On his application, he stated that he served a suspension for too many unexcused check-ins.

This appeal is raised in the context of the trial court granting CHH’s motion for judgment. A motion for judgment is governed by Maryland Rule 2-519 which provides:

During Hershberger's arrest, police found marijuana on him and in the car, where they also found rolling papers, said Shaner.

Prior to that hearing, Slaughter was aware of the topics to be discussed during the trial, and thus he had proper notice. Additionally, prior to the hearing, the Dean of the Brigham Young University graduate school contacted and informed Slaughter personally of the location of the hearing and allegations against the plaintiff. After an ongoing institutional investigation that last several months, the university hearing was held between the plaintiff, the Dean of the graduate school, the chair of the Chemistry department, the assistant to the chair of the Chemistry department, two faculty members from Slaughter’s advisory committee, and Dr. Thorne, Slaughter’s advisor. The plaintiff alleged that he received implied permission to use Dr. Thorne’s name because of his position as the plaintiff’s advisor. After hearing this explanation and considering the plaintiff’s academic progress, on March 14, 1972, Slaughter was expelled from the graduate school for violating the Brigham Young University Code of Student Conduct. The plaintiff was formally informed of his expulsion and he was given the opportunity to record the hearing. No further proceedings were

Hakeim Macklin is a fourteen year old African-American male before the Portsmouth Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court on charges of trespassing on school property and two counts of destruction of property. On December 21, 2016, Hakeim appeared in Portsmouth Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court with his mother and attorney before the Honorable Substitute Judge first name Nicola. After all evidence was heard, Hakeim was found guilty of destruction of property and trespassing on school property. A social history report was ordered and the case was continued until January 25, 2017. His charge of burglary was continued for trial on the same date.

This file will now be returned to Mr. McClelland for further defense handling. If you have any questions regarding this hearing report or any other issues, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. McClelland. It was a pleasure to handle this file on your behalf on a one-time

First, the alleged unlawful employment practice was not committed in Oklahoma. BNSF made the decision not to hire Doolittle in Fort Worth, Texas. Kowalkowski Decl. ¶ _____. Second, BNSF maintains the employment records relevant to Doolittle’s allegations—both medical and nonmedical—in Fort Worth, Texas. Kowalkowski Decl. ¶ _____; Obermiller Decl. ¶ _____. Third, the position at issue is a Mandan, North Dakota position, not an Oklahoma position. ________ Decl. ¶ _____. Finally, the fourth venue option does not apply because there are other applicable districts where venue is proper, but if it did apply venue under it would exist only in Fort Worth, Texas. Obermiller Decl. ¶ _____.

In the case of Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), the plaintiffs Dwright Lopez, Carl Smith and Betty Crome from Columbus, Ohio were suspended from Central High School and McGuffey Junior High School for ten days without a hearing. There were nine students including Lopez, Smith and Crome came together and claimed they were innocent, they denied any misconduct and went to Southern Ohio District Court. They argued that that the school violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process (hearing). The due process law is related to the Fourteenth Amendment meaning that each person has ledge rights to have a fair notice and opportunity to be heard before any processing. At the time