Jacques Corriveau

In 1980, he and his party, Parti Quebecois, called a referendum on the topic of Quebec sovereignty. He asked the Quebecois to present his government with a mandate to negotiate with Canada for a new agreement based on sovereignty-association. This meant that Quebec would become independent from Canada politically but stay closely associated with Canada economically. The partnership would mean free trade between Quebec and Canada; both nations would have the same currency and both would have the same tariffs on imported goods. Prime Minister Trudeau promised the negotiation of a new constitution that would recognize Quebec as a distinct society in Canada and an equal partner in confederation. Then, during the referendum, only 40% of the Quebecois actually voted for sovereignty-association. This referendum caused a rift between the people in Quebec because it led to Trudeau making an opposing argument that split Quebecois opinions. They remained divided on the issue as shown by the close vote for the referendum, which shows the separation in views. Additionally, the referendum not only caused tensions among fellow Quebecois, but also between the Quebecois and English Canadians. Quebec was trying to separate from Canada in order to distance itself from other Canadian cultures and preserve its own. So the fact that

“An immigrant who can bring with him work for twelve people is to be welcomed with open arms even in a industrial colossus like the United States - welcomed anywhere it would seem but in Canada...Not only have the refugees brought work, but they have brought new customers”, (Document, 9).

The Liberal Party's membership of Canada is committed to the fundamentals that have developed and sustained the Liberal Party from any other political party; individual freedom, responsibility and human dignity in the framework of a just society; political freedom in the framework of meaningful participation by all interested persons, and the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides the framework for both a democratic society and for the interaction of members within the party. It is also devoted to equal opportunity for every person, to the enhancement of our unique and diverse cultural community, to the recognition that English and French are the official languages of Canada, and to the preservation of the Canadian identity

In Canadian government it best to have legislators who do not vote their own interests and they vote the interests of their constituents. If legislators vote in their own interests they could be going against their own parties or the constituents that voted them in. Even if they know a lot about the subject they should still keep their interests out of their decisions and keep the interests of their constituents. Legislators that vote their own interests might even be going against the party policies, which could get them kicked out of the party or disciplined. Legislators are there to represent the people of their riding, not to vote their own interests in.

The article takes up an audit event that dominated Canadian national politics for the first three quarters of the year 2000. The proximate cause

Laws are made to keep a society at peace among the people. They can protect people from each other, while maintaining a functioning and productive society. However some crime victims may have laws named after them. These laws typically address legal ineffectiveness, which could have helped to find and punish the criminal in that case. Laws that have been named in honor of a crime victim, aim to protect future potential victims and lessen the chances of recurrences of previous cases.

The Liberal party was successful in the past due to its ability to reinvent itself in order to meet the changing circumstances and needs. The ‘proactive’ Liberal was strangely absent in the pre-2011 election campaign and turned themselves into a reactive and passive entity just to defend and respond to the opposition’s unscrupulous campaign of personal attacks and vilification. Liberals were always based firm on their political values and philosophy; however, these vital elements of the party were not seen to being used during the campaign for 2011 election as much as it was seen being caught in the mud-tossing against the Harper Government.

Docherty addresses criticism both internally and externally of the governing party. Internally Docherty suggests that while advances for nonpartisan selection of specific roles, such as the Speaker, have been successful in achieving some neutrality, party discipline and loyalty to the executive remain incredibly strong in Canada making internal dissention both politically and strategically unwise for members of a governing party. Externally of the government, parties and individual MP’s do not receive the same type of research support as well as funding as those which hold particular positions such as Ministers or meet standards set by the Board of Internal Economy. While oppositions can scrutinize in the form of Question Period (QP) or Private Members Bills (PMB) these measures have become more symbolic and theatrically politicized than they have been historically leading to more talk and much less action.

In the middle of 2012-2013, there were articles with central themes such as “the second coming of Trudeaumenia” referring to Justin, where they were vociferous and touting his celebrity status, eloquence and a famous name that can possibly not hurt his chances. Author Ron Graham, noted that Justin Trudeau was an interesting young man with a glamorous name, no baggage. But if there 's to be any Trudeaumania, it would have to build from scratch

On October 19th, 2015, Canada had its 42nd general election. Justin Trudeau was the best choice Canadians could make in terms of electing a new Prime Minister. Many past leaders of the Liberal Party of Canada can be held accountable for great change, such as Lester B. Pearson commissioning a search for a new flag, Pierre Trudeau (Justin Trudeau’s father) creating the Official Languages Act and Mackenzie King instituting a national old age pension plan. Justin Trudeau is also considerate of the citizens of Canada; this is evident based on his opposition of the Northern Gateway Pipeline and outspoken support for the middle class throughout his candidacy. Similarly, Trudeau does not only consider himself responsible of his citizens but also the environment, given his promise to modify Canada’s national park admission fees and interest in ending fossil fuel subsidies.

The largest moral and legal issue that is applicable to both cases as well as most other scandals and affairs in the government is a lack of transparency (Aucoin, 2006). In the Pacific scandal, Macdonald went behind the backs of the people of Canada and many people in his government and wrongly sold the rights to the railway. This demonstrates a lack of transparency because the public was unaware of what he was doing. It is unquestionably crucial to our democratic system that the public has unwavering faith in their leader who can be trusted to uphold a certain degree of morality. There was also a lack of transparency in the Sponsorship scandal because Chretien chose to direct the program from the PMO (Prime Ministers Office) and bypassed the procedures that the Deputy Minister of Public Works and Governmental Services Canada (PWGSC) generally are expected to follow (Aucoin, 2006). Furthermore, the Deputy Minister of PWGSC failed to provide any safeguards that would prevent the misuse of the funds in the program (Aucoin, 2006). Due to blatant lack of administrative control, it is not surprising that a scandal

For 74 years the individuals of this community are full of the actual fact that nobody knew what became of the person World Health Organization based our city that bears his name. when a agonizing incident that occurred on on a daily basis late within the fall of 1882, John J. Cozad on the Q.T. slipped away. His woman missioner Gatewood Cozad with their 2 sons John and parliamentarian conjointly disappeared shortly when, though adult male. Cozad came for on a daily basis within the early nineties he didn't reveal his secret and ever since the blackout has been complete. There has been a persistent rumor that one in every of the Cozad boys became illustrious as an author however the mystery was ne'er cleared.

Mass media plays a great part in our lives. Television, newspapers, magazines surround us everywhere every day of our lives. All of them are stuck with different kinds of ads. But how often do we pay attention to the real sense of those ads and the ways the advertisers try to sell various products to us? We see dissoluteness and challenging behavior every day in life and we got so used to it in, at first sight, such small pieces of film, and apparently of our day routine, as advertisement, that we hardly notice the big picture. For over twenty years, Jean Kilbourne has been writing, lecturing, and making films about how advertising affects women and girls. In her essay, "‘The Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt':

The artist that created the masterpiece of Ugolino and His Sons is Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux. Born in 1827 in Valenciennes, Nord, he came from a family of masons. Carpeaux was a French sculptor and painter during the Second Empire under Napoleon III. Carpeaux entered the École Nationale Supérieure des Beaux-Arts in 1844 and studied under the Romantic Sculptor François Rude. In 1850 he abandoned Rude’s studio for Francisque Duret, another teacher at the school that helped Carpeaux receive an honorable mention for his Achilles Wounded in the Heel in the Prix de Rome competition that year. Carpeaux then followed that up with second place for his figure Philoctetes on Lemnos and in 1854 he won the Gran Prix de Rome for his group Hector and His Son Astyanax.

Voters are not the only people who benefit from the practice of party discipline. The practice is also fundamentally important for the stability of the Canadian government. Being a pluralist country means there are groups (political parties) of differing ideologies that represent