preview

James Whitman Harsh Justice Summary

Decent Essays

Harsh Justice by Yale Law School professor, James Q. Whitman, too discusses the absurdly harsh punishments of the American penal system. However, he does so by laying out the history and culture regarding punishment policies within America and Europe, specifically France and Germany, in order to support his claim that America is harsher in comparison. America, who has perceived itself as the “Liberal West”, has in reality begun to creep closer and closer to being similar to countries like Iran, Nigeria, China, and even Nazi Germany. James Q. Whitman strongly believes that America’s legal system is harsher than Europe’s in all aspects: the criminalization of a wider variety of conduct, especially regarding sex and commerce; the subjugation …show more content…

The American colonies had no such thing as aristocrats; therefore Americans cared far less about status than Europeans. Due to the lack of care regarding one’s status, America did not create any special form of punishment for high status persons that could later serve as a basis for milder and respectful punishment reforms for all, like in Europe. Its prisons comprised of a mixture of all inmates regardless of their social status or nature of their crime, and all received the same treatment. This treatment can be thought of as “low status” treatment for all criminals to receive, one which involved extreme harshness and indignity. Interestingly in the 19th century, Tocqueville theorized and predicted that societies would become less harsh as conditions became more equal because social inequality promotes injustice and a lack of proper respect for human beings. However, the opposite proved to be true in the histories of America and France and Germany. Whitman shows that France and Germany, who were strongly hierarchal in the 18th century, moved in the direction of mild and dignified punishment for all, while America, who was relatively more egalitarian, moved in the direction of harsh and degrading …show more content…

Indeed one may expect that if a state has more power and there are fewer restraints on this power, that it would impose harsher punishments, but in America, Whitman Argues, its state’s power is relatively weak and restrained, and that is why it imposes harsher punishments. France and Germany, which he describes as stronger states, are able to impose milder punishment because of it. Whitman suggests that strong states often times have milder punishment because its power is manifested in the autonomy of its apparatuses, the bureaucracies that guide it, which are shed from public and political pressures. In France and Germany, their bureaucracy experiences a much weaker influence of popular feelings of anger and revenge, which helps a milder system of punishment become the norm. In America, whose state power is considered weaker, the masses have say in how to deal with criminals through democratic politics. Recent history has shown that many politicians have gone the “tough on crime” route, in order to appease the public and seem harder on crime than their

Get Access