Jane Eyre and Fahrenheit 451 are two pieces of literature destined to stand the test of time. They both possess various traits which distinguish themselves as ‘classics,’ thereby allowing them to be relevant novels regardless of the time period. These aforementioned traits are derived from the facts that both of these novels are timelessly relatable in the sense of possessing the universal ‘coming of age’ theme regarding overcoming disillusionment, give a glimpse into history by acting as symbols of societal norms in their respective time periods, and demonstrate elevated writing largely through the use of symbolism. A critical part of growing up seems to always entail the overcoming of some form of disillusionment. Jane Eyre and Fahrenheit 451 both illustrate this theme so often demonstrated in classic ‘coming of age’ novels. In Fahrenheit 451, Montag becomes disillusioned with his role in society as a fireman: his job is to burn books. Montag goes his entire life blindly following the notion that books are not only superfluous objects but objects which incite chaos. However, after observing a woman who chooses to burn alongside her books rather than be without them (Spencer 65), Montag begins to reflect on all that he has been doing as a fireman and the mindlessness with which he has been doing so (Bradbury 49). The fact that this woman was willing to die for the exact cause Montag was trying to eradicate opens his eyes to the fact that his job may not be as honorable
The book fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is about Montag, a 30 year old firemen who is someone who burns books for a living. He has always done what he’s told, he became a fireman because his father was one and his father before him was a firemen. Montag never questioned if he was truly happy with the profession that he was essentially given at birth, marrying his robotic like wife, and always going with the social norm. That burning books was good and knowledge was unnecessary in their society. Montag meets a life altering acquaintance, a 17 year old girl named Clarisse, she changes Montag’s viewpoints on life, causing him to rethink everything. Although, Montag has never questioned anything in his life, he learns he may not be as happy as
When a society abandons the past, the future becomes more unfamiliar than ever before. This is a concept present throughout Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, in which the society has abandoned reading in its entirety. Guy Montag, the main protagonist in the story, is a fireman. The word fireman itself has lost its historical meaning in the story and has changed from men who put out fires to men who start fires and burn books. The reason these men burn books is because they were outlawed after people stopped reading them, and this is done in order to maintain social equality.
The protagonist of Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, fireman Guy Montag, meets his seventeen-year-old neighbor Clarisse McClellan one summer evening after work, and this meeting begins Montag’s transformation of thought. The novel is set in the future, and a new reality in this time period is that firemen don’t extinguish fires but instead burn books. In the past, Montag has enjoyed his job, but upon meeting Clarisse, he begins to wonder why books are not allowed in current society, and that leads to his later actions. Clarisse is the catalyst: she influences Montag’s thinking and actions because she herself thinks and lives differently than others. While most people in the city spend their time rushing through life distracted by jet cars, ‘parlor walls,’
In the novel “Fahrenheit 451” Ray Bradbury and the short story “A Summer’s Reading” Bernard Malamud establishes a relationship between the books today and the way books are used in the novel and the short story. Bradbury demonstrates the burning of the books symbolizes the lacking of education and knowledge in today’s society. Malamud emphasizes the main idea about reading and why many people today do not appreciate the knowledge given. The novel “Fahrenheit 451” states that books are banded and burned to prevent the future and do away with books. The young man in “A Summer’s Reading” explains the suffrage, he went through because he dropped out of high school and never returned or kept up with his education. In the novel and the short story, Bradbury and Malamud compare and contrast the importance of books with political and social themes in today’s society to how books influenced people back then.
The society in which Fahrenheit 451 is set is characterized by its pleasure-seeking and distraction-filled culture, intolerance of self-expression and mindless entertainment. Through the sudden, ‘accidental’, death of Clarisse and the woman who refused to leave her house as the firemen burned all her books, the novel proves this society's need to eliminate anyone who goes against the general social conformity. As Beatty explains how their world came to be as it is, Montag asks about Clarisse and Beatty responds, “The girl? She was a time bomb. The poor girl's better off dead,” and then adds, “Luckily, queer ones like her don't happen often. We know how to nip most of them in the bud, early” (57). Through his explanation of their current society,
Independence, the capacity to manage ones own affairs, make one’s own judgments, and provide for one’s self. Jane Eyre herself is a very independent woman. Throughout her life she has depended on very few people for very little. Charlotte Brontë wants the reader to learn that independence can open many doors of possibilities.
Truth is a “true or an actual state of matter”. In all these three novels that I chose, hiding the truth is harmful, but it’s easier to just hide the truth for some characters. Although it’s easy to hide the truth, there’s a lot of weight, one have to carry as the truth is hidden. Telling the truth can also be dangerous for other character is these novels. Yet, no matter how long it takes or how dangerous it is to tell the truth, we can see that it always finds it’s way out in Othello, The Scarlet Letter, and Fahrenheit 451.
Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, is a thought-provoking novel which raises concerns about what the future may hold by extending a current problem so that it can be viewed from a different angle. In this novel, firemen destroy books to rid the society of knowledge where the citizens completely abide with this process, living a carefree and simple life. Through Montag’s eyes, Mildred and Beatty are the epitomes of ignorance, seeking lives of pleasure and simplicity that parallel to modern society.
But because he’s now met Clarisse, he now sees everything differently. He starts doubting things around him as if everything isn’t the way it’s supposed to be. An example of this is when Montag contradicts Captain Beatty by saying “He wasn’t insane” (Brandbury 31). Montag asked Beatty what had happened to the man after his house was burned down, and Beatty answered with saying that he was crazy, so he was sent to a asylum. Before, Montag would’ve just done his job with no questions asked. He realized he had been thinking more like Clarisse and more for himself. Montag no longer thinks like everyone else, and he now questions everything because he sees everything from a different perspective
During the height of the Victorian Era, in which the books Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte, and the Importance of Being Earnest, by Oscar Wilde, it was not uncommon for more well-off households of the era to have at least one Governess hired to help keep the younger residents educated and orderly, and to keep the servants of the manor abiding by the constructs in which the Victorian era set out for them as consistently as possible. Therefore, because the Governess was so prominent within the rich classes in regards as a role in their house—like how the contemporary writer gains inspiration for satire of the rich from writing the stereotype of a tired and underpaid maid—the Victorian novelist used the role of the Governess to write in a
In today 's society, marriage is a significant bond that must be on the basis of love and understanding. Marriage is a relationship described as more for love and emotion rather than convenience or money. Through the experience of Lydia and Wickham, Charlotte and Collins, and Elizabeth and Darcy, Austen criticizes marriages based on infatuation, convenience and money, and emphasizes that marriage can only be successful if they are founded on mutual love.
Jane Eyre when compared to Victorian times was different, to say the least. She broke many feministic social norms within the contexts of the book. From her call to respect from all, to her hesitation to marry, as well as her need for intellectual stimulation, she would have been a stand out, astonishing woman in this time. Jane was a woman who broke boundaries and challenged and questioned the rules set in place by man every step of the way and she did it with kindness for the most part, with a well deserved sense of pride in her and from her background. Jane Eyre's call for respect caused many conflicts within the story.
An obscure orphan governess, perceived to be too young, too penniless, too insignificant to control her own life, defied societal conventions of her time, and remains relevant to this day. Why does this poor, plain governess with no financial prospects or social standing matter in a modern feminist perspective? If she could speak, a modern feminist’s beliefs would likely shock her, so to interpret this novel as feminist, one must see it through the lens of the time and place Brontë wrote it. Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre was a feminist work in that Bronte expressed disdain for oppressive gender structures through the voice of Jane Eyre, and the actions of Bertha Mason.
In both Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre one of the major themes is social class. Social class is still an important issue in our current society. People are judged on superficial things such as money, cars, and houses. Even though we should not judge others based on their monetary worth, it is done everyday in society. Judging others will always be an issue in society.
Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre emerges with a unique voice in the Victorian period for the work posits itself as a sentimental novel; however, it deliberately becomes unable to fulfill the genre, and then, it creates an altogether divergent novel that demonstrates its superiority by adding depth of structure in narration and character portrayal. Joan D. Peters’ essay, Finding a Voice: Towards a Woman’s Discourse of Dialogue in the Narration of Jane Eyre positions Gerard Genette’s theory of convergence, which is that the movement of the fiction towards a confluence of protagonist and narrator, is limited as the argument does not fully flesh out the parodies that Charlotte Bronte incorporates into her work. I will argue that in the novel