Jane Goodall

In conclusion, scientists and researchers shouldn’t test on animals because it hurts them hurts them. When scientists make animals have pain and the react to it they continue to cause them more pain. Most scientists and researchers buy and breed animals to do tests on them and they shouldn’t because it isn’t right and they have no right to do so. When most animals are tested on they die or get really sick to the point where they might need to be put down. Animals testing should be banned and scientists should stop breeding test

In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used in medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.

It also says that all these restrictions are just slowing down and discouraging scientific research. Jane Goodall brings up JoJo and the difference between wild chimps and chimpanzees used in scientific study. She states that chimps don’t benefit the study of AIDs because they rarely exhibit symptoms. Jane Goodall says that the chimps are prisoners serving for a crime they didn’t commit. That the animals are so like humans that the need to be with their families in the wild and shouldn’t be treated in a

Initially you might believe that animals have moral rights. Animals tested are don’t even have the mental capacity to comprehend different objects, let alone what they’re going through. They just have similar features of a human, which outside of this scenario would be completely useless. Another argument might be how testing doesn’t have guaranteed results, but hurts organisms in the process. While this is true, testing has an 83.7% success rate, while taking in consideration animals that were too weak to live past a few hours. Taking note of how only a few hundred animals are tested on a year, that 16.3% is a minimal amount. This is all for the better of humans, and even animals. After all, animal products are created off of these tests too. The death of a few animals, is better for us, and the rest of

Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of them would address crucial flaws in many of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are supposedly “protected” by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world, using the excuse that we are expanding knowledge and furthering medical research. In the United States alone, there are very few laws truly protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the research forces upon them with many exceptions. Additionally, in reference to the scientists who perform these tests, the author of the article,

Zoologists study animals and other wildlife and how they interact with their ecosystems, They study the physical characteristics of animals, animal behaviors and the impacts humans have on wildlife and natural habitats as well as write articles and books on findings. One of the many zoologists who has made a huge impact on this field of work is Jane Goodall. She lived with primates for a portion of her life, studying them and educating herself on their way of life opening doors to some of the most amazing discoveries.

There are over 26 million different types of animal being tested on for research each year in the United States. Animals are used for testing every year for human research. Different animals go through serious pain, in order for humans to facilitate growth in different fields of study. Many animals are used in order to study diseases and potential cures for the diseases. New research chemicals are tested on animals with similar structures to humans, to see if the medicine can help with certain diseases. Tons of scientific advancement has taken place because of animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist, without a safe way to test for potential cures. The issue at hand is the type of treatment that animals have to endure because of the different testing methods. They are treated very poorly, go through intense suffering, and normally have very poor living conditions. A pro to animal testing is that many cures and different medicines have been developed through animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist without cures. Secondly, animals have a much shorter life span than humans do, so scientists can study the results through the whole life span of the animal. With humans, it is hard to do a full test because we have such high lifespans, while animals tend to live a lot less longer. Thirdly, many animals have been saved because of animal testing. Many diseases animals deal with now have vaccines and cures, as a result of animal testing. Without it, many animals would have rabies or other types of virus that can be detrimental to the animal’s health. On the contrary, a con to animal testing would be the pain many animals go through as a result of the testing. The tests are experimental, so we don’t know exactly what the chemical drug will do to the animal. Many cases have turned bad and many animals have died as a result, or gone through extensive pain. Next, there are many alternative methods of experimental testing that doesn’t require animals. As a result, why are we still using animals for testing when there are other ways to do it. Finally, animals are different from humans, so they make poor testing subjects. We can’t know for sure how the research

No other anthropologist or primatologist has been featured in as many books, newspapers, magazines, or movies as Jane Goodall. Jane has won 8 honorary doctorates and over 24 other awards in her long career. She was awarded the title of Dame by the queen of England. She has written 127 books and starred in 27 movies. She was an explorer in residence for National Geographic for 2 years. Jane was even awarded the title of the United Nations Messenger of Peace-twice! She was the first woman at Darwin College to earn a PHD without an undergraduate degree first. (Uglow, J. The continuum dictionary of women 's biographies) No other primatologist has discovered so many details providing more insight into the theory of evolution as Jane. No one has been as aggressive in the acts of conservation of primates and their territories. Jane was born in London on April 3, 1934 to an engineer father and an author mother. Because WWII had devastating economic effects on England, her family was poor at the time of her birth. (The Jane Goodall Institute.) Soon after the war her parents divorced and Jane stayed with her mother. Jane grew up in a small seaside town called Bournemouth, England and lived there until the age of 19. Jane has been married twice. The first marriage resulted in a son. After divorcing her first husband Jane married again; less than a year into their marriage her new husband died of cancer.

Animal testing has risen as an extremely controversial topic among scientists and animal rights activists. Many see it as a necessary part of finding cures for thousands of diseases. On the other hand, animal rights activists believe it is an inhumane, harsh, and unnecessary flaw in science. The argument can go back and forth but I believe animal testing should not be used in today’s technically advanced era. The laws are flawed, the failures are evident, and the available alternatives prove that animal testing should be indefinitely banned for future science experiments.

Have you ever wanted to help something or someone so much that you are willing to spend your life doing it? That's what Jane Goodall did. An admirable person is someone worthy of admiration, inspiring approval, Reverence, or affection. After what Jane Goodall did she is pretty admirable. She spent many years of her life helping chimpanzees by observing them in there natural habitat and she also designed programs to help them survive. She is most known for her many years of research with chimpanzees in the of Gombe, Africa. Jane Goodall is admirable because she is compassionate, determine, passionate about living things and making a difference.

Specific evidence points that animal testing should not be allowed; however the debate is also on moral grounds. Several people, about 60% of the population, agree that animal testing should be banned because it is just wrong. To be born into the world on a concrete floor and be made to lead a life with no freedom is worse than having no life. They have no chance to stop the pain or torment, simply because they are “just animals.” Animal activists and everyday people believe that humans are voices for the animals. Therefore, animal testing is considered ethically wrong and people should act as the advocate for the animals.

As the number of animals being used in animal testing goes up, many people pose a concern about the subject. There are around 100 million animals that are killed in the United States each year alone in animal testing (“Experiments”). These animals are tested for medical training, chemical, drug, food, cosmetics, biology lessons, and even curiosity driven experiments Animals including cats, dogs, rats, guinea pigs, monkeys, and many others are used. Alternative testing options are ways that scientists can still study and research different things while also saving the lives of animals that are used in animal testing everyday. Even though many people depend on animal testing to discover different cures

Thousands of animals are hurt and even killed because of animal testing every year. Scientists use animals of all kinds, apes, mice, rabbits, cats, etc. to experiment on. These experiments range from giving them drugs, to see what effect they might have on humans, to testing what extreme heat would do to the human body. The outcome of these experiments are often harm and even death. Animal testing is not morally justified because it causes harm to live animals, there are suitable alternatives to animal testing, and there are too many differences between humans and animals to be able to call the outcome “Accurate”.

Jane goodall is a 82 years old women. She had a dream to go to Africa to meet our closest cousin in in the animal kingdom chimpanzees. The struggle for change for jane is having animals rights with chimpanzees and trying to communicate to them while no one else believed her she would do it. They just thought she would just give up on it and come home. But no she went to the Gombe Stream Game Reserve. (It's a small place for the chimpanzees.) When she was 26 years old and she fell in love with them and stayed in africa.

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.