Japan's The Soviet War

1173 Words5 Pages
wThe shift in policy (the reinterpretation of Article 9 and what is the changes) would mean Japan could assert itself as a military power in the region and expand its influence globally, as well as provide the U.S. with a string military ally that act as a counterweight against an increasingly aggressive China, Russia and North Korea.
The controversy with remilitarization lies in Japan’s constitution, which forbids Japan from having a military. After WWII, Japan’s wartime atrocities were fresh on the mind of the Supreme Commander of Allied Powers, General Douglas MacArthur. In order to eliminate the possibility of Japan ever taking aggressive military action again, MacArthur and his senior officials wrote a new constitution for Japan, which pursued a number of reforms including disbanding the military. Specifically, Article 9 states (states the article 9 point).
What is ironic is that even though the United States wrote Japan’s pacifist constitution that disarmed the nation, the U.S. has been pushing for the remilitarization of Japan since the Cold War. In 1952, the two nations signed the U.S.-Japan Peace Treaty, in which the U.S. recognized Japan’s right to join in collective defence and its United Nations right to defend itself as a sovereign nation. Over the years, it has become evident that despite the benefits Japan has enjoyed from its peaceful constitution, the time has come for Japan to embody its right as a sovereign nation to provide its own defence.
Whether

More about Japan's The Soviet War

Get Access