Jay Guilty Evidence

Firstly, the Nisha call placed Adnan with Jay after the murder. This call could have been a butt-dial that rang for 2 minutes. The call could have been from Adnan, who wanted to make Jay talk with Nisha. The Nisha call does not prove Adnan killed Hae, as it simply just puts him with Jay at the time. Also, the prosecution stated that Adnan was constantly doing bad things. Everyone does bad things, but it does not make them murderers. Finally, Jay knew the location of Hae’s car. The fact that Jay knew the location of Hae’s car should arouse suspicion on him. The evidence utilized by the prosecution is circumstantial and can be disproved, and the lack of strong evidence proves Adnan’s

Most people don’t think adnan is guilty since there isn’t enough evidence . When you start to look at all the evidence and all the stories that were told it all truly comes back onto adnan. Adnan is guilty for the crime he did because he can’t recall where he was on current day, every speech he has given it falls back on him, and most of all adnan is in every evidence that anyone gives.

Although I believe adnan is guilty because he killed hae, some may argue he is innocent because he was a good kid. This reason makes sense because he volunteers to help the community. This part of the story is when adnan and his friends are going to say all of the good things he did. Most people in the community are saying that he was a great kid but he still did bad stuff in the low. This proves that he is innocent because most people knows adnan and most people are saying he was a good guy.

Adnan Syed was a golden boy to people; he was smart and loved by everyone. He never thought he’d be convicted of his ex-girlfriend’s murder, neither did anyone else. In fact, when he first received a call from the cops regarding Hae’s disappearance he brushed it off, more scared at that fact that he was high on marijuana and talking to a police officer. He thought Hae had just ran off to California, just like everyone else. However, when they found her body in a park notorious for being a body dump his whole world turned upside down. Soon after this a friend of his, Jay, confessed to the police into helping Adnan with Hae’s murder which then put Adnan behind bars. However, was Jay’s testimony true? Unfortunately Adnan’s case has many flaws and lies to it, and the true answer still remains; is Adnan Syed actually innocent or guilty all along?

A lot of people wonder if Adnan Syed is guilty or innocent, today as a legal assistant I'm going to tell you one important reason why he is innocent. Adnan is not guilty because there is another potential suspect like Jay. Jay's story that "proves" Adnan's guilt, has changed every interview and testimony. Jay had intimate knowledge of the crime he knew things, like if he knew every single thing that Adnan was thinking about which makes everything looked suspicious. Also Jay's stories don't quite match Adnan's cell records.

Think about how often people get arrested and how often trials are held every year, let alone every day. Oftentimes, innocent people are accused and charged for a crime that wasn’t their fault. This was the case for Adnan Syed, an innocent guy who was put in jail for a murder case. On January 13, 1999, Hae Min Lee was murdered at the age of 17. The evidence in this case was very unexplainable, but of course, the state went after Hae’s ex-boyfriend Adnan who really had nothing to do with the murder. Things that prove Adnan’s innocence are the breakup between him and Hae, how Adnan thought about and his feelings towards Hae, how the times and stories told with others didn’t suit well, and his alibi. Additionally, his DNA didn’t match with items

When someone is innocent, they aren’t blamed for a crime, and when someone is guilty, they are blamed. So, would Adnan Syed be innocent or guilty, for being accused of murdering Hae Min Lee? The podcast Serial is narrated by Sarah Koenig, which is about a man named Adnan Syed who was put in jail for “killing” a woman named Hae Mine Lee. Adnan’s ex-friend, Jay, accused and turned in Adnan into the police, stating that Adnan killed Hae. Because of this, Adnan was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to life. After investigating the case, it is clear that Adnan is innocent because he had a good relationship with Hae after the breakup, he was a good student, and there was no trace of Adnan that showed he killed Hae.

The main reason why Adnan was in the center of this investigation was because his best friend, Jay,

The crime had taken place in a twenty-one minute time frame, though this affidavit extracts Adnan from the scene, placing him in the library during the extent of the murder. In the letter it was written, “Dear Adnan-- I hope I spelled it right. I'm not sure if you remember talking to me in the library on January 13, but I remember chatting with you" (Episode 1: The Alibi, Page 18). According to Asia Mcclain, author of the affidavit, Adnan had spoken to her at library when he was supposedly enacting the deed of strangling Hae to death. The contents of the letter as opposed to what was established about the time frame of Hae’s death clearly demonstrates that Adnan is innocent, “Quote, "We left around 2:40," unquote. Remember, Hae is supposed to be dead by 2:36” (Episode 1: The Alibi, Page 18). Adnan had spent the time with Asia at the library, being there during the frame of time in which Hae’s murder occurred, making it impossible for him to be the killer. Adnan Syed has an alibi, putting him away from the scene of the crime, this indicates that he was innocent and should not have been

Similarly, Koenig in Serial spends many hours reviewing the case attempting to discern, whether Adnan is guilty or innocent. She spends many hours on the phone with Adnan, even more than she does with her friends. Koenig feels invested in the case and in Adnan. When Adnan says, “I mean, you don’t even really know me though,” Koenig gets very insulted. Koenig believes that through the over thirty phone hours she logged with Adnan, she got to know him. She even calls this Adnan’s hostility, as she describes in her podcast following this statement “This is the closest thing to hostile Adnan has ever gotten with me.” The case certainly is very time-consuming for Koenig, and perhaps becomes a big focus of Koenig’s life to figure out whether Adnan

Throughout Koenig’s investigation, she wavers on whether Adnan is guilty; she does not tell us her viewpoint of Adnan’s innocence - the direction she chooses in her conclusion. When Koenig describes the case in episode six, she lists reasons for Syed’s guilt. After, Koenig searches for reasons to disprove those reasons of Adnan’s guilt, and sometimes she even asks Syed for explanations of her findings. Many times, Koenig agrees with Syed’s explanations and many times she does not. Koenig agrees with Syed’s explanation when discussing Cathy’s detective interview, in which Cathy tells the detective that Adnan was saying on the phone what am I going to do and what am I going to say. Adnan explains if I know the police are going to call and do

Adnan syed is innocent as Before he was arrested they should've had more sufficient evidence against him as some of it just doesn't add up or cannot necessarily be pinned to him . So he shouldn't have been declared guilty until the following evidence were investigated, which includes jay who could've been the murder , adnan's alibi , the cell phone towers which was already said to be not accurate and also find more reliable witnesses. Here is why adnan is innocent...

The police also know that John works with gang members, and they came to the Centre to talk to John. They asked John for information about one particular young boy, who they believe was involved in a drive-by-shooting two days ago. You overheard John disclosing information about the boy to the police.

At this point, the lead detective begins to tell DeShawn what happened and what he (Deshawn) did. The interrogation seemed rehearsed and it was very one sided, that is, the detective did all the talking. This technique is a poor representation of interrogation strategy and seemed contrived for television. Additionally, Deshawn was a minor and should have had a parent or guardian present with him at the time of questioning.

“Jordan, I am going to ask that you tell me where you were that day” Said detective Joe.